Jeff Davies, the Energy OG Profile picture
Nov 13, 2022 25 tweets 5 min read Read on X
$TWTR capital structure thread 🧵

Elon had commitments for $13 billion in credit facilities to help finance the Twitter buyout

They are shown here. $12.5 billion was likely funded at close with undrawn $500mil revolver

1/ Image
The are floating rate loans. Its noteworthy that SOFR (Secured Overnight Financing Rate) was 0.3% when the deal was announced

Just the move in SOFR from announcement in April to close in Oct cost Elon an extra $435 million per year in interest

2/
Total interest expense appears to be $1.286 billion today, but all of the loans are subject to increases in SOFR which Elon will bear unless he swapped rates (my gut says he didn't)

2 of the tranches also have punitive margin escalation/ratchets

3/
If you assume SOFR increases by 100 bps over the next year due to Fed rate increases and bake in the 50bps increase in spread on the 2nd lien and unsecured tranches, interest expense will be $1.53 billion in a year at a minimum, but it likely gets worse

4/
- The revolver and $6.5 billion term loan share in the collateral / security on a 1st lien basis
- Security is effectively the stock of subsidiaries, with guarantees from the subs also provided
- Revolver has 50 bps undrawn fee that is paid whether the facility is used or not
5/
- The term loans have NO financial covenants
- The Revolver has a max 1st lien leverage ratio that is set at 40% cushion to the acquisition model and only tested if RC > 35% drawn

6/
In credit, you can have contractual seniority or structural seniority.

Here, the $3 billion secured term loan shares in the security the RC and $6.5b term loan get but there is an intercreditor agreement that makes the $3 billion secured term loan contractually subordinate

7/
- So the $3 billion secured term loan is effectively 2nd lien
- Then there is a $3 billion unsecured term loan

So from priority of payment
1. RC + $6.5 billion term loan
2. $3 billion term loan
3. $3 billion term loan

8/
There is an accordion feature to add another $1.7 billion debt, which seems comical on its face

The $3b secured and $3b unsecured term loans have 1-yr initial maturity at which time they convert at the lenders option into extended TLs or exchange notes

9/
These two facilities are classic bridge loans, the rate/spread increases by 50 bps every 3 months to incentivize a cap markets take-out/refi

BUT if the loans term out, the rate then goes to the "Secured Total Cap" and the "Unsecured Total Cap"

10/
The cap rates are not provided publicly (side fee letter), but the caps would likely be a premium to final rate ratchet so lets say 15% for the 2nd lien and 20% for the unsecured

If converted into exchange notes (likely), the notes are NC3, they cannot be called for 3yrs

11/
At the assumed 15/20% rates on the 2nd lien and unsecured exchange notes, interest expense is > $1.7 billion a year, nearly $1b more than in April when deal inked!!!!

In 2019/2020 TWTR did $3.5 and $3.7 billion in revenue

12/
If we normalize ad revenue back to those levels but assume Elon's antics cause a 30% loss in ad revenue, the PF run rate revenue is $2.5 billion +/-

Compare that with $1.7 billion in annual interest

13/
This thing is going to bleed cash. I am unsure how much cash they closed with and the revolver is there for additional liquidity, but more equity will be needed down the road.

How quick depends on how much cash they closed with

14/
There were media reports that the term loans were bid at 60. I did not see if that was the $6.5 billion 1st lien or the subordinate tranches

Rough math but 40 points over 7yrs equates into 575 bps of additional spread to maturity and 500 bps over 8 years

15/
At forward SOFR and spreads, the term loans at 60 equate into the following yields

1st lien = 15%
2nd lien = 19%
Unsecured = 22%

16/
My guess is the 60 bid was for the 1st lien, which means the bid on 2L and unsecured papers likely sub-50 cts on dollar

So how do you inject equity if the debt is trading there?

Not easily

17/
Any equity to repay debt wouldn't come in at the prior $44 billion valuation, only an idiot would do that

So new money comes in at lower valuation and would - through that mark - likely wipe out most of the prior equity commitment

18/
Said differently, any new equity would likely come in at just above the value of the debt stack, re-pricing the value of TWTR down to 15b +/-

Poof. Elon's money and all co-investors money is gone in that scenario

19/
Think about that unsecured tranche

Who is going to touch that at less than 25-30% yield?

To get that yield the paper has to be trading at close to 0

20/
The banks holding this paper have massive incentive to get it off their books, but can they?

The losses will be massive

What is the plan to get to FCF, how long will the ad---> subscription conversion take?

Nobody knows

21/
So VERY high chance today that the 2L and unsecured term out and at that point cant be refi'd for 3 years

Elon is very fortunate the 1L doesn't have rate ratchets

But he is fighting the Fed on those pieces

22/
Lets say revenue does dip to 2.5b.... COGS has been about 35% of sales, so at that level, gross profit is $1.625 billion - les than fwd annual interest

The jobs cuts - below that line - will help but its just moving chairs on the titanic

23/
So all Twitter users should expect a massive push into subscription revenue, its the only salvation

But can Elon grow subscriptions fast enough and keep the spirit of Twitter alive?

Will be seriously threading a needle if he pulls off

24/
TLDR

The cap structure is a mess and interest expense has explosive upside

Hit me up if you want help out of this mess @elonmusk

end/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Davies, the Energy OG

Jeff Davies, the Energy OG Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EnergyCredit1

May 12
OK. Let's do a thread.

Phoenix Energy One may become a national scandal this year with retirees losing hundreds of millions

Fortess Investments may have a serious public relations disaster when it happens and Trump's efforts to reduce investor protections will get called into question.

Given the CEO of Phoenix is highly litigious this is of course all in my opinion only.

1/
Phoenix is an oil & gas company with primary assets in the Bakken that began operations in 2019. They own operated assets, non-op and minerals

They currently have a S-1 filed with the SEC for $750 million of Senior Subordinated Bonds

Other than a Fortress 1st lien most of the capital they have raised is from Jobs Act Reg A+ and Reg D bonds that get sold to retail investors that they find through Instagram, Youtube and Facebook ads

2/Image
The capital structure is completely fucking bonkers

The new bonds from the S-1 (if the SEC approves, I'm doubtful given open and active investigation into the company) are Senior Subordinated Bonds

Those bonds will prime/layer the $500 million of Reg D Junior Subordinated Bonds and be junior to

- Fortress 1st lien
- Adamantium Secured 2nd lien
- Adamantium 2nd lien
- Unsecured Reg A and Reg D bons

3/Image
Read 15 tweets
Apr 5
🚨 OK, we officially have a FormulaGate Emergency

A thread you won't believe

Hat tip @AEI
🧵 1/

aei.org/economics/pres…
Here is the formula
2/

The important part:

Let ε<0 represent the elasticity of imports with respect to import prices, let φ>0 represent the passthrough from tariffs to import pricesImage
Text is here from the USTR report



3/ ustr.gov/issue-areas/re…Image
Read 7 tweets
Mar 26
Oil & Gas Execs absolutely blasted Trumps policies anonymously in the Dallas Fed survey

Unlike political shills who defend every policy industry execs know and tell you his policies are hurting the industry.

Drill Baby Drill is a myth today. Will not happen. Trump is hurting the industry per execs.

A 🧵

Cc: @DavidRamsdenWoo @jendubayevans

The key word to describe 2025 so far is “uncertainty” and as a public company, our investors hate uncertainty. This has led to a marked increase in the implied cost of capital of our business, with public energy stocks down significantly more than oil prices over the last two months. This uncertainty is being caused by the conflicting messages coming from the new administration. There cannot be "U.S. energy dominance" and $50 per barrel oil; those two statements are contradictory. At $50-per-barrel oil, we will see U.S. oil production start to decline immediately and likely significantly (1 million barrels per day plus within a couple quarters). This is not “energy dominance.” The U.S. oil cost curve is in a different place than it was five years ago; $70 per barrel is the new $50 per barrel.

1/
First, trade and tariff uncertainty are making planning difficult. Second, I urge the administration to engage with U.S. steel executives to boost domestic production and introduce new steel specs. This will help lower domestic steel prices, which have risen over 30 percent in one month in anticipation of tariffs.

2/
The administration's chaos is a disaster for the commodity markets. "Drill, baby, drill" is nothing short of a myth and populist rallying cry. Tariff policy is impossible for us to predict and doesn't have a clear goal. We want more stability.

3/
Read 18 tweets
Nov 25, 2024
Trump's Energy policies largely revolve around increasing US oil & gas production and deregulation to grease the wheels.

Increasing oil production will be easier said than done, in my opinion

A thread 🧵

1/
The primary elephant in the room is that policies to reduce inflation by reducing Energy costs are limited by rate of return, payback periods and simple old economics.

If you believe the oil industry, $65 +/- oil is needed to profitably drill new wells.

Oil is currently $70, there isn't much juice to squeeze. If prices are materially below $65, the industry will slow drilling regardless who is POTUS.

2/Image
Law of larges numbers comes into play. We are at all time high oil production. Decline curves never sleep, even if more tails are stacked, large production increases get harder.

Worth noting using EIA weekly data US production rose ~2mm bps under the last Trump admin vs 2.3mm bpd so far under Biden

Despite supportive policies and Drill Baby Drill mantras 2017-2021, the industry was coming out of a downturn and bankruptcy flush from 2014 through 2020 and were forced by stakeholders to focus on returns (see point above).Image
Read 18 tweets
May 2, 2024
Securities fraud 101 with $MMTLP / TRCH / NBH

And a story of the owner of Moe's Irish Pub getting involved with this long running scheme

Every time I look I find more

Yet another thread 🧵

I hope this helps people uncover this stuff themselves and avoid these situations

1/
In Apr '17 & Apr '18, TRCH issued a total of $12.5 million unsecured bonds - 12% cash coupon, 2.5% equity kicker, came at discount so +/- 15% paper

Billionaire (Straz) trust bought

In 1Q21 10Q TRCH tells us all notes converted into equity and retired

Appears false

2/ Image
Notes were paid off by March 31, 2021, right?

On June 16, 2021, NBH filed the certificate for the Pfd stock that would become $MMTLP

An asset sale was contemplated, there was a carve-out made to repay the Straz notes with any proceeds



3/ sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archiv…
Image
Read 23 tweets
Apr 28, 2024
Life is like an onion. You peel it off one layer at a time, and sometimes you weep.

I just peeled an onion and don't know whether to laugh or cry

Long thread warning

$MMTLP

@nbhydrocarbons
@jpdewoody
@CliftonDuBoseJr
@TexasBullMoose

1/
I laid out recently how 2 producing wells by all appearance were stolen from Torchlight by Greg McCabe and Clifton Dubose in '20

Looks like $5-7 million of oil revenue based on Texas RRC data

Thread is here:


@SEC_Enforcement
@SECEnfDirector
@FBI

2/
Not only does it appear to be corporate theft, but they were undisclosed related party transactions, 10(b) SEC violations

The deal was done with Masterson Hazel Partners

Who owns MHP?

Dubose and MHM LLC

3/ Image
Read 35 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(