In 2020 some were saying "steal" line was unhelpful because it would demoralize voters in future. True or no, many decided to cheer on the 2022 election despite serious doubts that there would be free elections going forward. Youngkin surprise in Virginia seemed to help (thread)
Various possibilities were entertained RE 2020: 1) there was a steal but they could only steal prez, not local and congress; 2) the Dems hated Trump and once he was out wouldn't dare use same against GOP reps; 3) GOP made a deal to oust Trump in exchange for gains in House, etc.
Other theories were thrown around but all assumed that GOP and its consultant class were competent people interested in winning. Forgotten was how their entire candidate roster was crushed by a reality TV multiple divorcee playboy in 2016, even in evangelical South Carolina, etc.
Forgotten also in the "GOP will want to win elections after 2020 and won't let steal happen to them" was that they let themselves get totally wiped out with these same fraudulent tactics in California in *2018*...when OC was "flipped" along with other Red California counties
The GOP diddled itself in 2018 as they were purged from California and the Dems consolidated power, disenfranchising opposition completely; they were crushed in 2016 by Trump; they did nothing in 2020. But people thought the real smart and cynical GOP would somehow reemerge? How?
I know frogs who were staffers in some of these races. They did what they could but had no power to change the idiotic ways of the GOP consultant class. They're dopes and losers. They're not cynical manipulators, they're hamhanded morons and have no plan. Some are indeed traitors
For example races like that of @bgmasters and @joekent16jan19 were sabotaged by GOPe and their proxies. In these and a few other cases they're happy to let the Trump 2020 scenario repeat and see the Dems blatantly steal from challengers to their hold on authority within the GOP.
But their collusion with Dem steal in 2020 and now is passive, not a Machiavellian orchestration; they themselves get crushed in other cases like California, and do nothing about it. The GOPe fundamentally care only about preserving jobs for themselves, friends and relatives
The Carli Fiorina phenomenon is fundamental to GOP "strategy": run some vain rich idiot, pilfer them of $$$ while you put your nephews in consultant and campaign jobs. They lose but you don't care because you still have job/career.
It's the same with D'Santis now. He's not Fiorina and unlike her he's smart and has possible future path to presidency. But a run in 2024 would split and crush the right for a generation. The GOPe don't care though; they keep their and nephews' jobs
Here's the energy and tactics that GOP used in 2000. Look up Brooks Brothers Riot. GOP lawchads physically went in and stopped the steal. They didn't let others disenfranchise voters; the Dems are using the equivalent of physical violence at this moment. Where this GOP?
Courts won't step in if one side is threatening violence, as the Dems are now, while the GOP is meekly accepting "the letter" of laws that have been violated and impregnated. Judges now only feel immediate pressure from one side. The GOP are caponized morons for the most part.
In the end the first step must be the political expulsion of the GOP authorities, pundits responsible for failures really since 2008 at least--these same are trying use D'Santis now as their tool--and their replacement by men of energy and intelligence who realize this is war
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here is Herodotus' famous passage "nomos is king among men": THE example he uses for the Greks is cremation. One of their most cherished rites, and as such it was most faithfully practiced by aristocracy. The bone studies RE ancient Greece are based on deviant or lowcaste samples
Burned bones can't be really studied for DNA in this way. The bones available from Mycenae grave circles (the earliest Greks, who practiced steppe style burial) are EDITED: they still refuse to reveal this after many years. They are also much larger than their contemporaries.
In population genetics, sample collection is everything. Many samples that are basis of these studies you're seeing are collected/handled improperly with no care for their provenance. In fact this is an ideological commitment, as archaeologists "don't want to privilege class"
Schopenhauer statement that because mass of mankind is stupid, wicked and depraved; and so every nation in the end is just a different collection of vices. Very profound if thought through; should be compared to Plato, Machiavelli, Rousseau, Nietzsche on "creators of peoples"
Plato, Machiavelli, Rousseau, Nietzsche are chief political thinkers who understand peoples are founded by Creators (or "Legislators") who use religion to form the "unwritten law." The law written in the hearts of men, that is, the habits, tastes and mores of a people.
It is this that forms ultimately the character of a people as we come to know it in history by observation. The law as ordering principle, and as that which is held as high before every people by a Moses, a Lycurgus, Mohammed, a Homer, Pindar + 7 Sages, a Numa Pompilius etc.
The cynical economic explanation of our woes, for example blaming mass migration on oligarchs seeking to lower wages, is only half true at best and less than half as effective as some think. In terms of samizdat or what we can conceivably achieve on here, it's good but not enough
Normies who believe in the morality of mass migration or those leaning that way aren't going to be swayed by the argument they're dupes for Dark Money interests that have manipulated their sense of right and wrong. You have to actually engage the underlying humanitarian morality
The importation of Turd World and in particular South America has similar dynamic to high low coalition that ruins South American countries periodically. But in that coalition the oligarchs are the junior partner and merely profiting off a leftoid big city logic “votes for gibs”
Tweet Zero quotes (which comes from a brown-nosing NRO intern) misunderstands the fight we are in. There's a value to building camaraderie & anti-authority positions around nonpolitical things. We're in a long-term cultural war; short term "policy wonkery" has in fact less value
Talk of "distraction" is not just stupid but simple malice, envy. Raw Egg going on Tucker to talk about poisoning of food supply and to present attractive, healthy image for the right isn't stopping Luca or other Serious Thinkers from writing Policy Papers or being Revolutionary
I myself am banned from appearing on Tucker by the way but am happy when Raw Egg or other frends can go and promote our sphere. There isn't a "limited supply of exposure"; it's symbiotic and I do well even when people on the right who dislike me get featured in media
Reminder leftists call Lula and Rousseff, who are Marxist terrorist guerrillas who planted bombs, fly the hammer and sickle, and are openly supported by the Brazilian Communist Party, "NEOLIBERALS": to deflect manifest failure away from the left and obscure leftist world rule
This is also how the term is used in America and explains the Chapo and online left's rhetoric of "NEOLIBERAL ELITES" and "Nazi Deep State": in fact the "Old Left" is 100% on board with GNC and with modern left establishment, and is secure throughout academia, media and govt.
A lot of the online left are just commies who for whatever reason couldn't get establishment sinecures. It's a total falsehood that the Old Left is somehow based or excluded from the establishment. I've known open Marxists with bust of Stalin on table high up in USA bureaucracy.
Unpopular hypothesis: a modified libertarian program of deregulation, low/no income or corporate tax, deregulation including ending affirmative action and bans on IQ tests for hiring—minus libertarian immigration policy—would be functional whyte supremacy in an American context.
Ending the welfare state would by the way also de facto end almost all mass third world immigration. But it wouldn’t end H1B computard and other guest worker programs that hurt educated and middle class Americans. So…libertarianism plus closed borders?
Disclaimer: I don’t myself believe this is right way but question is why not. Ending immigration should be number one priority…question is can you do it as Bannonites assume by “engaging with socialism” or have you already scraped bottom of the Sanders barrel?