David Fishman Profile picture
Nov 14, 2022 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
A big milestone for China's offshore wind that I missed a few weeks ago: Shandong's first GRID PARITY offshore wind project (500MW) was connected to the grid.

This means the offshore wind power is generated at a unit cost level competitive with coal-fired power.

Quick 🧵 A crane vessel next to an offshore wind turbine.
According to the news, the Shandong Bozhong project achieved an LCOE of 400 RMB/MWh, (USD 56.90) basically at the same level as the Shandong base coal price (394.9 RMB/MWh).

It represents a huge, HUGE decline in construction costs for offshore wind in the past few years.
For contrast, the average LCOE of the already-existing offshore wind in China is around 790 RMB/MWh, nearly twice as much as this new project. These projects were built a few years ago, during the subsidy era.

In 2010, offshore wind cost per MWh in China was well over 1000 RMB.
Major factors for LCOE decline:

-Improvements in turbine blades, esp. length, allowing them to generate more power, more cost-effectively.

-Decrease in construction costs due to experience, economies of scale. Big cost drops for crane vessels, maritime labor, maritime cables.
Offshore wind is particularly important for the long-term decarbonization plans of China's industrialized coastal provinces like Shandong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong precisely because they lack onshore land for deployment of solar or wind (or land usage fees are sky-high).
For now, some of these provinces have been able to keep their renewable capacity growth strong via mass deployment of rooftop solar (particularly Shandong, which leads the nation).

But the available rooftops will eventually run out, while the growth in demand will not.
That's what makes control and mastery of offshore wind development costs so important for China.

It's major part of the equation for coastal provinces securing low-carbon power at reasonable prices (via their preferred in-province investment, not via cross-province imports).
For instance, here's Shanghai a few days ago, soliciting tenders to build an 800 MW offshore wind farm PLUS STORAGE at an unit cost no higher than the Shanghai coal base price of 415.5 RMB/MWh.

This would have been impossible just a few years ago.

news.bjx.com.cn/html/20221111/… A screenshot of the news story headline from BJX
Here's the link to the announcement from the Energy Administration of Shandong.

Lots of nerdy technical details about tons of carbon offset, # of turbines, etc.

nyj.shandong.gov.cn/art/2022/11/2/…
Well yes demand growth actually WILL run out someday, but way after the available rooftops do.
*Important note*

Although this project claims to have achieved an LCOE of 400 RMB/MWh, which is nearly level with the coal-fired base price in Shandong, I was unaware that Shandong offers a provincial capacity subsidy for offshore wind constructed from 2022-2024.
Thus, it should be inappropriate to refer to this project as "grid-parity". Although it will sell its power into the open markets with no subsidy on volume, it most likely had a one-off capacity subsidy at *construction* of 800CNY/kW.
hat tip to @MhehedZherting for the correction

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Fishman

David Fishman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @pretentiouswhat

Apr 17
This is a massive discrepancy - over 45 TWh of "missing" generation betweenChinese power generation stats and the power consumption stats.

I asked around and found the answer - but it was also something I wasn't aware of myself, so I learned something in the process...
Short 🧵
Previously, my understanding had been that National Bureau of Statistics powergen data (reported monthly) excludes distributed generation (like rooftop solar) because they report facilities "at-scale" 规模以上, meaning installations of 6MW or larger.

Actually this is wrong.
The NBS definition of "at scale" is actually "all businesses with revenues of 20M CNY or larger".

Tha China Electricity Council (CEC) is the organization that uses the definition of 6MW of larger for "at-scale".

So the NBS cutoff point is MUCH higher than the CEC cutoff point. Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 16
Rather than me just saying "lmao Noah's a dope", (which believe me, is always my first instinct) let us make this into a learning opportunity and take a detailed look at the thing he has misidentified as a government-run social credit system: Alipay's Zhima Credit platform.

🧵
So yes, that was a screenshot of his friend's Zhima Credit score (aka Sesame Credit) within Alipay.

Alipay, the financial transactions platform developed by Alibaba, is one of the two largest digital payment platforms in China (the other one is WeChat Pay, developed by Tencent). Image
Alipay assigns its users a credit score based on their history of transactions and behavior within its payment ecosystem.

This score is used the same way a credit score is used by financial institutions in the rest of the world: to assess users' creditworthiness or lending risk.
Read 22 tweets
Apr 1
An influential Chinese think tank: "Energy Security and New Strategies Institute" (operated by state-owned China Energy Media Group) published its 2024 power report, a comprehensive summary of 2023 data.

I've pulled out some of their key items and added very brief comments 🧵
A note before I begin: I know a lot has been written about 2023 already...most of this isn't new.

It's all good stuff, but I'm mostly writing this to have a handy place on Twitter to store these facts, if anyone (including me) wants to reference them again later this year...
Okay. 2023 China Annual Power Data:

- Power generation increased 6.9% YoY (nice)

- Installed capacity of renewables hit 1450 GW, exceeding the installed capacity of thermal power
(a meaningless milestone)

- Renewable energy met 30% of power consumption (a big milestone)
Read 21 tweets
Mar 26
A juicy solar scandal is unfolding in Hubei, as reported by CCTV.

Their investigation reveals a large solar PV + agriculture farm in Anlu City, Hubei was likely built on "Prime Farmland" (基本农田).

This land is supposed to be reserved for food production.

(ht @crushspread) Image
The CCTV Caijing Investigations report is titled:

"Exposed by CCTV! Spending 8 million RMB to Develop High-Standard Farmland, Two Years Later Converted to Solar PV; Rice Yield Plummets!"

It's honestly some of the best stuff I've ever seen on CCTV.

news.cctv.com/2024/03/25/ART…
To understand why this is a big deal, you have to appreciate the fundamental sensitivities around food security and rural land development in China.

Certain types of land are absolutely forbidden to be developed for industrial purposes and must be preserved for food production. Image
Read 21 tweets
Mar 20
Faces of Jingmaishan 3: Milk Tea Grandma

I find Grandma sitting in front of her timber home, carefully tending a small charcoal fire.

The sign behind her says "Grandma's Milk Tea".

"Grandma's Milk Tea? So...are you the Grandma?"
"That's me!" she replies cheerfully. Image
"How much for a cup?"
"Fifteen yuan. Do you want to try?"

"Okay, we'll have one please"

She motions us to sit on some small stools next to the fire while she prepares the tea in a ceramic pot over the fire, a combination of Pu'er tea, dried flowers, milk, and rock sugar. Image
We're at Wengji Village, (翁基村) a small natural village in Jingmaishan. It's a Blang ethnicity minority village with a total population of 334.

It is a very minor tourist attraction. On Ctrip, it has 31 reviews.

That's why I'm here - I'm trying to get off the beaten path... Image
Read 24 tweets
Feb 27
BIG policy notice from China's NDRC and NEA today on the need for grid flexibility investments and upgrades, with targets for 2027 and beyond.

"Guidance Opinions on Strengthening Grid Peaking Energy Storage and Smart Dispatch Capacity Building

A few highlights: Image
This is a major document - essentially a near/mid-term manifesto for grid flexibility capacity and storage investments. It is split into sections for:

1. Peaking and Flexibility
2. Storage
3. Smart Dispatch
4. Marketization
5. Organizational Capacity

I'll just cover #1 here.
For peaking and flexibility, it puts out the following goals and work areas:

- 80 GW of pumped hydro storage capacity by 2027

- Demand response capacity should meet 5% of peak load by 2027 Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(