The @libdems Federal Board has finally revised the party's Definition of Transphobia after 2 years of controversy, criticism and legal uncertainty. beta.libdems.org.uk/code-of-conduc…
The change comes after the party received legal advice from two KCs, of which Karon Monaghan's can be viewed here liberalvoiceforwomen.org/s/Karon-Monagh… The second legal opinion has not yet been published.
We welcome the new Definition, which takes into account the @MForstater ruling and emphasises the need for "robust, passionate debate". This is a great improvement on the last version.
Key improvements are:
🧡 References to Stonewall removed
🧡 Makes clear that holding and expressing gender critical beliefs = protected by law.
🧡 "Misgendering" and "deadnaming" no longer featured
🧡 Disciplinary action only for serious offences.
Also mentions:
🧡 Fairness
🧡 Equality
🧡 Robust, passionate debate
🧡 Lawfuness
🧡 Honesty
🧡 The right to disagree
Some small contradictions and areas of ambiguity remain, but this is a nonetheless a huge step in the right direction.
The @LibDems are the first major party to acknowledge the lawfulness of gender critical views and make this explicit to their members. 💚🤍💜
The party has done well to realise that - however well-intentioned - mechanisms to restrict speech should not be introduced without good reason a great deal of thought. Also, they should be forged in the crucible of debate at Conference, and not superimposed from above.
We hope this change signals a move toward encouraging and enabling instead of restricting debate within the party.
Clearly it doesn't end here. We are calling for a review into the treatment of gender critical party members over the last four years. liberalvoiceforwomen.org/blog/call-for-…
Meanwhile, voting in internal elections ends tomorrow (Tuesday) at 5pm. We urge members to vote for candidates who understand the importance of equality, fairness and the right to disagree.
See our recommendations here liberalvoiceforwomen.org/blog/internal-…
We would like to thank all those within the party who helped make this happen including @LordStras who commissioned the top-notch advice from @k21fem, @SarahLudford for her bravery and commitment and everyone who stuck their neck out to sign our letter. liberalvoiceforwomen.org/letter-to-mark…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
V encouraging performance by @EdwardJDavey on @BBCAnyQuestions Acknowledged:
✅ Importance of safeguards in GRA to prevent abuse
✅ Need for mature, open debate
✅ Importance of level playing field for women and girls' sports
✅ Gender ID is question of BELIEF #RespectMySex
"The GRA allows people to change their gender, but it puts safeguards in to avoid abuse."
This is such an important acknowledgement @EdwardJDavey
Please have an urgent word with @agcolehamilton before these crucial safeguards are abandoned in Scotland. #RespectMySex
"We have to listen and have an open, mature debate. Let us listen to each other, and let us show some kindness."
We couldn't agree more @EdwardJDavey
Let's work together to make sure this happens at Lib Dem Autumn Conference. #RespectMySex
The interim report for the Cass Review of gender identity services for children and young people, out today, is VERY good news for everyone who wants to see evidence-based care for children and young people. cass.independent-review.uk/publications/i…
Here are the key points in tweet form 👇
"The rapid increase in the number of children requiring support and the complex case-mix means that the current clinical model, with a single national provider, is not sustainable in the longer term."
"We need to know more about the population being referred and outcomes. There has not been routine and consistent data collection, which means it is not possible to accurately track the outcomes and pathways that children and young people take through the service."
Ever wondered why our party appears to have such a blind spot when it comes to the impact of our trans policies on women, LGB people, children, the wider social fabric?
Here is your answer: libdemvoice.org/the-funny-thin…
The people who would ordinarily interrogate policies and flag up problems are literally frozen out of the channels that normally host debate, because people who are fundamentally opposed to discussion of the subject get to control the groups!
We take no pleasure in criticising our party's policies to an unlimited audience here on Twitter. Our preference would be to have these discussions with our colleagues on private Lib Dem members’ Facebook groups, at conference, etc.
Our motion addressed the issue of aggressive censorship of female academics, and the university sector's failure to uphold women's freedom of speech, and their rights to equality.
It cited @MForstater v CGD and the @akuareindorf Report, and asked conference to condemn the climate of violence, intimidation and abuse of gender critical academics.