Peter Zeniewski Profile picture
Nov 15 13 tweets 5 min read
How much will it cost for the world to transition coal? That’s the trillion dollar question. At the @IEA, we did a detailed assessment of every coal plant in the world, and all the coal used in industry, to make some estimates. Let’s ‘dig’ in... Image
The total investment needed in clean energy to displace coal? $380 billion per year, globally, from now until 2030. That is around 20% of all clean energy spending in our Announced Pledges Scenario, which gets the world to 1.7°C by 2100. Image
$380 billion to transition away from coal isn't much. It's less than the GDP of Austria. It’s 0.4% of global GDP.
Coal is very dirty, and solutions to displace it are pretty cheap: think wind and solar, mainly (at least for this decade). Image
But sun and wind isn't the only thing. You also need strong grids and lots of batteries, hydrogen to displace coal in heavy industry, CCUS, electrifying end uses, and you need to be super efficient. In industry - a tough nut to crack - lots of this is in the demo/prototype phase. Image
In power, things are easier. In fact, total system costs in the power sector are no higher with less coal on the system. Means the transition is eminently affordable after you’ve made all that upfront investment. Image
So what stands in the way? A few things: there are inflexible long-term power purchase agreements, which means coal plant owners get their pay day even if it’s cheaper to generate with renewables. Image
There is also a whopping $1 trillion of capital sunk into coal plants that is yet to be recovered. That kind of money is bound to keep a lot of players invested in their continued operation. Image
But many initiatives under way to restrict financing for new coal, and to find creative solutions to power down the existing stock. International support is key: e.g. the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP), an excellent example of public and private capital coming together Image
In our own assessment, we found that reducing plant owner’s cost of capital by 4% paves the way for a retirement of 1/3 of the global coal fleet within ten years. That would be very well aligned with climate goals. Image
So to recap – the coal transition is affordable, and the challenges aren’t insurmountable. And if we operate the world’s coal assets as they have been in the past, we’ll sail past the 1.5° budget. That will cost the world much more... not just in dollars. Image
Those were just a few morsels. The whole meal: iea.org/events/coal-in…
...and join us LIVE for the launch! Starting in two minutes iea.org/events/coal-in…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Zeniewski

Peter Zeniewski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PZeniewski

Oct 28
European Union imports of Russian natural gas in 2022 will be down to around 60 bcm. The last time they were so low was in 1984. Here are some insights on where we go from here, using our latest @IEA #WEO2022 projections
What happens next with Russian gas is obviously uncertain, but as @tim_gould_ said at the WEO launch yesterday, we assume that there’s no way back for the EU-Russia gas relationship. That relationship was built up over many decades on the basis of trust. And that trust has gone.
In STEPS, we project a continued reduction in the EU's reliance on Russian gas. By 2030, imports are 90% lower. In APS, they are 0 before 2030. This is not easy; to avoid destructive demand reductions or price volatility, a huge scale up in clean energy (and LNG imports) needed
Read 10 tweets
Mar 25
Everybody is staring in disbelief at European #gasprices. If the gas market is broken as many have been saying, it would most visibly be seen in the TTF benchmark. Here are my two cents (warning, lots of correlations ahead!)
The main explanation for the much higher level of TTF is the fear premium brought about by Russia’s withholding of supply (pre-invasion), tight LNG markets and very low EU storage. But TTF really is off the charts. Fundamentally, is gas really worth the equivalent of $200/bbl?
The model I use to assess European gas prices says no. It’s a simple model that back-casts EU prices based on an US LNG export margins and a 6-9 month lag on Brent. The rationale is that gas prices in Europe should reflect a bit of oil indexation and the cost of spot LNG.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 13
The focus of Europe’s gas supply crunch has mostly been on storage levels, Russian imports, and LNG. That makes sense, because the crisis is an acute one, and is mainly due to supply problems. But what about the longer-term? What can be done to reduce future vulnerability? 1/10
Recognising the importance of storage is of course crucial, and supply diversity is likewise essential for security of supply. But demand has been less of a focus, except when we hear about curtailed factory output or gas-to-coal switching in the power sector.
Insofar as we talk about the medium-term, it's mostly about gas' essential role as a dispatchable, flexible source of power generation (esp. as renewables grow and coal/nuclear come offline)
Read 10 tweets
Sep 6, 2021
A thread on today's crazy high #naturalgas prices, with a few thoughts on long-term implications:
Gas prices have been on a wild ride of late. Several price benchmarks are sky-high. In Europe, the main spot price benchmark (the “TTF”) is a whopping €50/MWh ($17.5/MBtu). That’s never happened before. Various indices tell us Asian spot prices are above $15/MBtu, too. Yikes.
These spot prices are telling us markets are tight. Lots of reasons for this, from factory output rebounding in Asia to aircon use during heat waves to high European carbon prices pushing more gas into the power stack. Storage is low. Supply is gummed up here and there.
Read 15 tweets
Feb 21, 2020
I’m trying to lose weight, which is kind of like trying to address #climatechange. I made a bunch of pledges to myself at my very own COP35 before Christmas 2019. But how can I do it, and will I succeed? 1/11
A diet is about finding the right balance between energy demand and supply. I can reduce my consumption, switch to healthier fuels (less ‘fossil’ varieties, more ‘greens’). I can also exercise, making everything more #energyefficient. Setting targets is also important. 2/11
But by golly, it’s hard to fit all this in when I also have to maintain a job, an apartment, pay bills, keep relationships… there’s more to life than fretting about the climate (um, I mean, my health). 3/11
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(