I feel like a lot of corporate end-times staffing (not just Twitter) looks like this: some paper pusher sees what “all hands on deck” looks like in an emergency and thinks, “what the hell, why aren’t they working like that all the time.”
This doofus then comes to the conclusion that the correct way to proceed is to fire half the staff, because that’s all you need to get the work done, and they’ll just work like it’s all hands on deck all the time.
There are two problems with this.
1. Everyone burns out.
and
2. When you get a *real* “all hands on deck” situation, you don’t have the staff to cover it.
1. Everyone burns out.
and
2. When you get a *real* “all hands on deck” situation, you don’t have the staff to cover it.
You are *supposed* to have slack in your staffing, and if you do not, you are understaffed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
