So we now have this remarkable headline: "red meat is not a health risk", referring to work by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME): bigthink.com/health/red-mea…
However, there's some prehistory to this story, which you may find interesting...
Thread 🧵 1/n
IHME is also behind the so-called Global Burden of Disease study, published in The Lancet. Recently, they came up with a revision of the data on red meat 2/n thelancet.com/journals/lance…
Bomb shell! Their 2019 revision contradicts the available evidence from the existing major studies & claims a massive increase in deaths attributable to unprocessed red meat, by no less than 36-fold! Without justification. At least, nothing credible. 3/n
The trick? GBD/IHME have decided to reduce the theoretical minimum risk exposure level (= safe intake level) of red meat to ZERO !?! 4/n healthdata.org/results/gbd_su…
They also claimed "causal" relationships, again without showing evidence. In protest, we wrote a letter to the Lancet (which was a painful process, but it eventually got published) 5/n thelancet.com/journals/lance…
Then - new bombshell - to our astonishment, IHME publishes this 👇, which is the study that forms the basis for the article in the first tweet of this thread. Pretty much a turnaround of 180° (or almost). 10/n nature.com/articles/s4159…
Nice, science back on track (or almost). But the key point now is - given all this - what should happen to the original Global Burden of Disease study in @TheLancet, given its substantial impact on policy making globally?
"In 1953, the Population Council was created [by] John D. Rockefeller III to predict population growth & survey global resources. The NYTimes applauded [the] organization as economists, public health officials & governments now reverberated the Malthusian 'predictions of misery'"
"The second half of the 1960s saw accelerated outpouring of Malthusian thought with titles such as The Hungry Planet (1965), The Silent Explosion (1965), Famine –1975 (1967), Born to Hunger (1968). Paul Ehrlich’s 1968 bestseller, The Population Bomb"
Ehrlich: "A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people"
"Livestock systems must progress on the basis of the highest scientific standards. They are too precious to society to become the victim of simplification, reductionism or zealotry"
"The highest standards of [..] evidence underscore that the regular consumption of meat, dairy & eggs, as part of a well-balanced diet is advantageous for human beings"
Everybody knows that #Nutriscore is meant to improve public health by favouring nutritious products and that only the #BigFood lobby is resisting its mandatory introduction. Ehr, wait... 🤔 nestle.com/media/news/nes…
Few days left to register to watch the International Meat Summit online & hear the latest evidence from leading experts. Don't miss this opportunity to learn what the science says about the role of #MeatInSociety & contribute to the conversation. Register: bit.ly/3SCZ9EB
1⃣ Neil Mann: The evolutionary role of meat
2⃣ Nick Smith: Meat in global nutrient supply
3⃣ Alice Stanton: How much red meat is good for us?
4⃣ Bradley Johnston: Evidence-based nutrition
1⃣ Pablo Manzano: Ecology & livestock ag
2⃣ Jason Rowntree: Ruminants & grasslands
3⃣ Wilhelm Windisch: Nutrient circularity
4⃣ Max Makuvise: Smallholders
5⃣ Celso Moretti: Low-carbon ag in Brazil
Proud to announce that I'm co-organizing the International Summit "The societal role of meat - what the science says" in Dublin, next week. Top speakers, and - YES! - possibility to follow the various keynotes online - register here for #MeatInSociety: events.zoom.us/ev/Apy_s03Q4-y…