Very hard to know what sort of vote some parties will get, eg ON and UAP which polled substantially at the federal election but may not be making as much effort this time.
Also question of how much Legalise Cannabis might eat into any Green gains that would otherwise occur.
Already seeing reminders of what rubbish this system is. In SEM my first attempt elected Hinch. When I took 1% off the Greens he was replaced by Legalise Cannabis.
The reason for this is that Labor prefs flow to L Cannabis vs Hinch but flow to Hinch vs Greens and there is a point where L Cannabis and Greens were close. Nothing like this will necessarily occur, it was just one scenario.
I didn't find Barton as much of a sure thing as initial estimates suggested either; took me three goes to elect him. Two issues (i) potential exclusion early in count (ii) Labor perhaps not having a surplus
Need to remember when using the calculators that they assume all votes are ATL. Some votes are not ATL especially in N Met. As a general rule if a party comes from nothing much and narrowly wins there's a fair chance that BTLs knock that over.
In N Met all my early attempts "elected" a left micro (either Reason or Vic Socialists) but Somyurek also looks at least competitive.
My first few runs of W Met all had Bernie Finn (DLP) winning by heaps.
N Vic I keep getting AJP, I sometimes get Quilty (LDP) as well but the L-NP prefs going to ON is a potential problem for LDP there (unless L-NP do badly.)
E Vic I keep getting Shooters (and sometimes L Cannabis as well but that bit's not very trustworthy.)
Interested in any observations of how Vic Socialists are going in terms of campaign activity etc. They had a very good vote in N Met last time but that was with Jolly as candidate; they went backwards in some strong seats at the federal election.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is disingenuous garbage from Premier Andrews. His own MPs on Electoral Matters passed the buck back to the Parliament to commission a review into GTV in the previous term and his own government then failed to start that review. #VicVotes
You could only think the matter of Group Ticket Voting was not in sharp focus after at least a fifth of the parliament was elected undeservedly in 2018 - resulting in a deluge of submissions - if you were a politician with severe vision problems.
It is also hypocritical for the Liberals to say they would refer Labor to IBAC as the Liberals should also be investigated over claims made in the video. In particular, whether a desire to avoid upsetting Druery resulted in them abandoning a previous anti_GTV position.
Tweet I quote-tweeted has disappeared but there are other reports that the teals have won their appeal against the VEC over how-to-vote cards. VCAT may have overturned 2018 Sheed ruling, will be interesting to see the judgement. #VicVotes
Pleased to see this because if the VEC and previous VCAT reading of the law was correct then the law would have been a donkey. No evidence the cards cause informal voting and even if they do it only hurts the candidate using them.
For a detailed discussion of why there is no evidence these cards shift the informal rate in either direction see my article here:
Internal polling "leaks" often turn out to be nonsense as they can be (i) expectation management (ii) disgruntled elements (iii) tiny samples (iv) incorrectly analysed (v) in some cases simply fictitious. Nonetheless noted to see how it goes post-election.
Oakleigh is on 16% and without a high-profile non-classic contender so this is sounding like a #pollshapedobject
I mean, what more is Frederico supposed to do, her card already tells voters they must number all boxes *twice*, does she need to say it a third time and get her lawyer to send the VEC a copy of The Hunting Of The Snark?
As expressed this is a completely absurd statement by whoever said it since Labor seats going to the Greens will make absolutely no difference to who forms government and will categorically not boost the Liberals' chances - if they exist - in any way.
A more intelligent way to defend it would be to say that they were forcing Labor to fight harder to defend those seats. But even that's not all that logical since two of them looked like very serious fights anyway. #VicVotes
(Note these are only how to vote recommendations, not preferencing in the sense of the upper house, but in the case of Liberal how to votes it can make a sizeable difference. Not a huge difference since the Liberal vote in eg Northcote is barely double figures, but a few %.)