He makes Bannon look weak. He basically laughs at him. THIS is how you treat Nazis and fascists.
Bannon wants to be seen as legitimate. His lies work best when the mainstream grants him legitimacy.
Deny him that, if you’re a pro-democracy reporter. #DemocracySummit /2
Bannon’s goal here isn’t really about words, it’s to exert a kind of dominance over journalists. “You are treating me like I’m for real—I have power over you.”
It’s @jayrosen_nyu’s thing about journalists as hate objects.
Journalists defeat that w/ ridicule and dismissal. /end
* not just because of the words
No no no no no
Come to a red area with me, touch grass, talk to some actual voters, and get away from limited polling please.
Imagine if Fetterman’s team said “show me data before you do all those videos and memes”!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is what happens when your democracy does not use every tool in its power to oppose authoritarianism:
The authoritarians get re-elected and aim to destroy your democracy from within the system.
Also see: Adolph Hitler. Japanese fascists in the 1930s.
America is headed this way too.
We are lucky, however, that the US populace — for now — is majority pro-democracy. Decades of war and terrorism have changed the Israeli population: it leans anti-democratic.
But the longer we wait, the more the neofascists will push America that way too, changing opinion. Gun massacre terrorism, white nationalist terrorism, and America’s huge fascist propaganda machine will make things worse and worse each passing year. That’s the neofascist goal.
Apparently disinformation is what we are going to get from Twitter under Space Karen.
The note is wrong. The Saudi billionaire is part of the Saudi royal family and thus connected to the Saudis- the government. And, he had to kick in money to help Musk. @joshtpm@ChrisMurphyCT
And a Saudi fund, Kingdom Holdings, also owns a big share of Twitter. The Saudi prince had to put in money at a pretty high valuation to make this deal work.
So yes. The Saudis did partner with Musk to buy Twitter. They are the second largest shareholder.
If this kind of deceptive BS is going to be attached to Dem Senators’ tweets, Twitter is going to be killed by Musk faster than he, Republican Larry Ellison (whose foundation is also a minority owner), and the Saudis can use it spread deception.
This is an example of how rightwing disinformation works, and the interplay between social media and outlets.
“Article IIIP” is a rightwing oligarch-funded pressure group (1st tweet is pro-Trump, ex), retweeting Newsweek, a zombie pub. @FixMediaNow@MAD_Democracy@whstancil /1
Newsweek was purchased by a rightwing outfit, and is now using its legacy name to trick people who are not media nerds into believing rightwing deception is coming from a real media source. /2
And the “Art 3 Project” sounds like a real courts group. But it’s a typical DC Koch-network oligarch thinktank, whose purpose is marketing and political PR, not actually about thinking or research.
/3
Preeminent conservative economist, funded by a top thinktank and held up as a leading conservative thinker, shows us he and his entire movement are weak-minded and intellectually bankrupt. #DisbandHoover
(This quote is basically “I understand nothing about science.”)
“Incomparable Dr. Sowell” you see what I mean.
Conservative thinkers are intellectual lightweights and we hear from them only because they are funded by rightwing billionaire oligarchs. #DisbandHoover
They’re getting talking points telling them to be passive and not to mention Republicans.
These are good sentiments.
But they don’t blame Republicans or Trump.
@DanAncona@moxie True.
He gets the public foundation/public utility part, though. Signal is a good model, but we need a way to get money into it to run servers.
Or maybe we just accept lower participation rates and figure out a donation/membership model.
@DanAncona@moxie The key aspect of the Twitter network is the highly engaged users. Maybe you charge to post (ex: pay for more than one post per week) but not to read. High-engagement Twitter users then subsidize the service, but it’s not chasing profit: house at @mozilla.
@DanAncona@moxie@mozilla Frankly, I don’t think it would be that hard to do content moderation at scale cheaply — the reason Twitter and FB can’t is because they want to max out engagement at the same time. They have an incentive to allow bots/trolls.