🧵 Let's get this in context:
1. The corrupt WHO declared a false pandemic.
2. Pfizer, a commercial company (with a very questionable past) that probably saw the false pandemic declaration as a huge commercial opportunity >>>
1. The corrupt WHO declared a false pandemic.
2. Pfizer, a commercial company (with a very questionable past) that probably saw the false pandemic declaration as a huge commercial opportunity >>>
https://twitter.com/JanJekielek/status/1592647197245714432
quickly pushed a product onto the market that it called a "vaccine" even though it was based on an unethical clinical trial that did not comply with the rules of clinical trials (follow @IamBrookJackson)
>
>
https://twitter.com/GalG____/status/1541039543750729729
in which information was manipulated to make it appear false 95% or higher efficacy and false safety- even though they had no data to support this and the critical phase 3 was ongoing at the same time as distribution
https://twitter.com/GalG____/status/1591746707368607745
3. They had to quickly push the product to the whole world to cash in before the world noticed and/or there were serious competitors - for that they needed the approval of a regulator that the world trusts and world leaders can hide behind: FDA.
>
>
4. More and more evidence and documents show now that for FDA approval, they used political pressure, money and conflicts of interest - but they also needed a laboratory to provide information that the failed clinical trial couldn't really provide, a scapegoat was needed.
>
>
5. So Pfizer entered into an unprecedented agreement with Israel as a laboratory for the world (this is almost literally stated in the agreement text) - an agreement that obliges Israel to quickly push the product, show efficacy and hide safety problems
https://twitter.com/GalG____/status/1438808435064254465
Those are my conclusion from the clauses that was published and not darkened- that forbid Israel to publish any data regarding this product and “project” without Pfizer's approval. Other attorneys wrote about this as well:
brownstone.org/articles/how-t…
brownstone.org/articles/how-t…
6. This unbelievable, possibly corrupt, deal - was led by 2 people in Israel (and many helpers) - Nethanyahu and Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis.
Nethanyahu, Israel’s prime minister at the time, that faced criminal charges in court, and still does (therefore is very susceptible)
>
Nethanyahu, Israel’s prime minister at the time, that faced criminal charges in court, and still does (therefore is very susceptible)
>
signed this unbelievable and censored contract. Nethanyahu presented this deal as a huge success,
all the media supported him, and he had no political opposition to this.
Recently was elected again - and returns to be the prime minister of Israel
>
all the media supported him, and he had no political opposition to this.
Recently was elected again - and returns to be the prime minister of Israel
>
after he served the citizens of Israel as a laboratory in this agreement he also made them feel that he and Pfizer's product were saving them.
The previous government that was elected in between as his “adversary” was implementing Green Pass and helping this deal.
>
The previous government that was elected in between as his “adversary” was implementing Green Pass and helping this deal.
>
7. We also saw that England and Canada were starting their “vaccination” rollout project at the same time or sometimes even before Israel, so they did not understand that we were a laboratory, in retrospect it was presented as inevitable and life saving. All based on lies.
>
>
8. Another key person was mentioned by name in the agreement: Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, today the head of health services at the Israeli MOH - who was mentioned by name and not by her position (and if she’s fired? Can anyone fire her?) 
https://twitter.com/GalG____/status/1438808512356835328
When the “pandemic” started she was suddenly declared as the Acting Head of Health Services (2020), and after the agreement was signed (January 2021) - The position was given to her.
>
>
Preis led the vaccine project in Israel and it was she who also reported on it to state officials, to the Israeli Supreme Court and to other countries and regulators. She published articles together with Pfizer and presented "real world data" (laboratory results) to the FDA.
>
>
9. Now we know, that this data was false, there was no reliable safety follow up, and the results that they did have later on - were not presented accurately to the public.
Why did we come to that conclusion?
Why did we come to that conclusion?
Because of a leaked conversation - which no one dares to comment on publicly.
Listen to Prof. Retsef Levi (who recently also published a study on heart side effects after this product they called “vaccine”) and his interview on this #IsraeLeak 👇🏻
Listen to Prof. Retsef Levi (who recently also published a study on heart side effects after this product they called “vaccine”) and his interview on this #IsraeLeak 👇🏻
https://twitter.com/JanJekielek/status/1592647197245714432
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
