Chinese influencer Li Ziqi has 17.2 million followers on YouTube.
She's the biggest by far, but there are thousands of other China-based accounts on the platform.
But wait. Isn't YouTube blocked in China? What gives?
Here's how it all works. 🧵
The short answer is that influencers from Li Ziqi down go through special agencies that are trusted by the party-state.
When she was still posting videos, Li did it through WebTVAsia, a Beijing-based YouTube-certified MCN* owned by Malaysian entertainment company Prodigee Media.
WebTVAsia operates more than 600 YouTube channels for PRC-based talent, including the People’s Daily, the official newspaper of the Central Committee of the CCP.
If you spent any time on China-watching Twitter in 2021, you probably came across these two women.
Party-state media, Chinese diplomats & foreign vloggers tried to make out they were just an ordinary account.
We took a closer look & found out that wasn't quite right. 🧵
The women, who introduce themselves in the above video as 'Elder Guli' & 'Younger Guli', two 'Uyghur sisters from Xinjiang', featured in the ‘Story of Xinjiang by Guli’ (SOXBG) set of accounts on YouTube, Twitter, Instagram & TikTok.
All of those platforms are blocked in China.
Actually, both women worked for a Chengdu-based agency, the name of which translates to ‘Chengdu Grey Man Culture Communications’ (成都灰灰侠文化传播有限公司)—a company heavily involved in Xinjiang-related propaganda work.
Here they are in a 'Chengdu Grey Man' recruitment ad:
I genuinely understand the urge to write about how WeChat, despite all its problems, is still a good app in some ways.
When I was in China, I loved using it.
But despite all the important activity & civic engagement that ~can~ take place on it, that doesn't change the fact that it is a highly censored & surveilled space.
WeChat censored our former Prime Minister & then completely de-platformed him. (If you believe any of the other explanations, I have a bridge to sell you)
I honestly do not see how that is not the end of the discussion. It was unacceptable & we shouldn't stand for it.
In giving his interpretation of the "Four Points" today, ambassador Xiao Qian avoided a lot of the stiff language that came in the original statement from Wang Yi.
In fact, unless I missed something, I don't think he quoted them at all?
The 3rd point "we must insist on not targeting third parties" became:
"to respect each other, seek common ground & properly handle differences."
The 4th point "we must adhere to building a positive & pragmatic social foundation of public opinion” became...
"to develop an inclusive relationship based on the interests of our own two peoples."
In June, Chinese Ambassador Xiao Qian repeated the patently false claim of his predecessor that Beijing's trade restrictions were driven by Chinese citizens & consumers—not his govt.
Journos, please press him on this puerile talking point at @PressClubAust today. #auspol
For this to be true, one would have to believe that Chinese citizens were so incensed that Australia called for an open & transparent investigation into the COVID outbreak that they lobbied for trade restrictions on us.
There is ZERO evidence that this is the case.
The bare minimum we should expect after we platform a Chinese govt official like this is that they don't insult our intelligence.