Great news via WeAreFairCop! Non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs) are/were a threat to #freespeech in the UK — like @WeAreFairCop and @BadLawTeam, the FSU has supported people who've fallen foul of this sinister form of thoughtpolicing.
Here's a brief 🧵on the history of the NCHI...
Back in 2014, the College of Policing's original guidelines defined NCHIs as incidents “perceived by the victim or any others to be motivated by hostility or prejudice”. Around 20,000 NCHIs have been recorded per year since then. spiked-online.com/2022/06/01/the…
At the time, NCHIs could be:
1⃣ Reported by the victim or by any other person who witnessed the incident.
2⃣ Recorded irrespective of whether there was any objective evidence to identify the hate element.
They also showed up in enhanced DBS checks for potential employees.
In December 2021, former police officer @HarryTheOwl101 won a landmark legal battle [Miller v College of Policing] against the police recording NCHIs and the then current guidelines were ruled unlawful. mailplus.co.uk/edition/commen…
The FSU was proud to back Harry in that case. Had he lost and had to pay the other side’s costs, we’d pledged to help with that bill. freespeechunion.org/weekly-news-ro…
More recently, we helped Kevin Mills. Two years ago, Kevin was handed a #NCHI by the police after refusing to work with a customer who he feared wouldn't pay the bill. The FSU intervened and Kent Police deleted his record earlier this year. The @Telegraph had the story.
Despite this great news that Chief Constables have been ordered to stop recording NCHIs, there's still work for the FSU to do. That’s because police forces in England and Wales aren't required to notify someone if an NCHI is recorded against their name... freespeechunion.org/an-orwellian-s…
… and because well over 120,000 NCHIs have now been recorded, it’s likely that tens of thousands of people still unwittingly carry one around on their records. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
If you want to know how to find out if you have one against your record, or how you might go about getting one deleted, the FSU has produced this short FAQ on NCHIs. freespeechunion.org/faqs-on-how-to…
And if you think there’s a risk you’ll be penalised for exercising your legal right to free speech, whether it’s in the workplace or the public square, you need the protection of the FSU. Join us today - membership packages start from just £2.49 a month. freespeechunion.org/join/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The FSU has looked at the terms and conditions of the major payment processors and crowdfunding platforms and given them a score out of 10 according to how friendly towards free speech they are. It's not great news.
❌ We don’t recommend any of the crowdfunding platforms.
✅ The only payment processors we recommend for users concerned about protecting their free speech are Worldplay (8/10) and Stripe (7/10).
🧵2/5
The difficulty the FSU's Research Officer, Carrie Clark, identifies is that most of these companies include subjective, ambiguous words and phrases in their policies, prohibiting things like ‘misinformation’, ‘hate speech’, ‘offence’ and ‘intolerance’.
The Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill has reached committee stage in the House of Lords. This means that after much debate, peers now have the opportunity to propose amendments to the Bill. The FSU has been monitoring amendments put forward and these are our top 3...
1⃣ Lord Moylan’s amendment which provides a definition to the phrase “#freedomofspeech within the law” which is premised on common law philosophy: freedom = anything that isn’t expressly prohibited. Lord Hope would outsource the job of defining the phrase to Strasbourg.
It is better to have a clear, certain and strong definition of #freespeech — Moylan’s amendment does just that, even spelling out what is expressly prohibited (including Holocaust denial) and clarifies the relationship between free speech and other legal obligations.
Online ticketing company Eventbrite has pulled tickets for a gender-critical event over fears it would provide a platform for "hateful" views. This isn't a one-off aberration — politically motivated financial #censorship is on the rise in the West. thecritic.co.uk/why-is-eventbr…
As evidenced by GoFundMe's decision earlier this year to withhold donations to Canadian truckers protesting against vaccine mandates. spiked-online.com/2022/02/06/big…
Or by PayPal's decision to demonetise left-wing, alternative media sites that published stories contradicting some of the West’s reporting of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. thecritic.co.uk/financial-cens…
The IMF says it needs to "understand" people's "strong preference for cash" so that it can better dispel "hesitancy" towards digital currencies.
It's not rocket science. People don't want to be cut off from their money due to their lawful political views. reclaimthenet.org/imf-ponders-wa…
As happened earlier this year when GoFundMe withheld donations to Canadian truckers protesting against vaccine mandates. spiked-online.com/2022/02/06/big…
Or when PayPal shut down the account of @UsforThemUK, a parents' group that fought to keep schools open during the pandemic, due to "the nature of its activities". telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/09/2…
The FSU has been demonetised by @PayPal for daring to stand up for #freespeech.
Thank you to all who stand in solidarity with us – existing members, supporters, and the many new members joining us today.
Here's a thread about who we are and what we do.
The FSU supports members that have been sacked, cancelled, penalised, harassed or attacked by outrage mobs simply for exercising their legal right to free speech, whether in the workplace or the public square.
The FSU gets an average of 50 requests for help a week, and at any one time we have around 100 'live' cases. We can’t always publicise our successes due to privacy (and security) concerns, but here’s a selection of some of our highest-profile cases from the past six months.
With our help, Simon Isherwood has won his Employment Tribunal case against West Midlands Trains! The rail conductor was dismissed for gross misconduct after asking whether indigenous populations enjoy 'black privilege' in African countries during a diversity training course.
We drafted in leading civil liberties barrister Paul Diamond to represent Simon, and the Employment Tribunal has now judged that Mr Isherwood was unfairly dismissed.
The judgement stated that: "Freedom of expression, including a qualified right to offend when expressing views and beliefs (in this case on social issues), is a fundamental right in a democratic society."