Since then, #StopFundingHate supporters have been credited with bringing about significant changes - including a marked reduction in anti-migrant front pages in the UK press
It's been amazing - and inspiring - to see the difference we've been able to make by combining the classic principles of consumer campaigning with the organising power of a social media platform like Twitter.
But #StopFundingHate was never about a single platform. At its core, #StopFundingHate is about an idea: If enough of us speak out & urge advertisers to stop supporting hate & division, then this could be the key to building a fairer & more honest media. /5 stopfundinghate.info/2018/03/13/the…
We're hugely grateful to everyone who's supported #StopFundingHate on Twitter & shared our content over the years.
Now please come & join us on Mastodon so we that can continue to have an impact!
Today's Daily Mail has devoted its front page to an inflammatory story targeting a charity, the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, which it says has "put critical race theory in its guidelines" &"wants courses including sciences & maths to teach about colonialism" /1
The Daily Mail then airs a series of extraordinary claims about the QAA, including a suggestion that the charity is enforcing "anti-white & anti-Western hatred & division" & wants to depict "every aspect of our past as evil and shameful". /2
The author of today's inflammatory Daily Mail story has previously claimed that "a THIRD of British universities are in a free speech crisis" ...in an article written for the Russian government's propaganda outlet RT 🤔 /3
Today's Daily Mail claims "freedom of speech and the academic rigour it supports have been dealt a catastrophic blow with the news that the Quality Assurance Agency... has incorporated ‘critical race theory’ into its recommendations to universities" archive.ph/Fe1hx
Today's Daily Mail article follows a wave of inflammatory media stories framing the discussion of equality issues as a threat to free speech.
Is this really a narrative that @AldiUK wants to support?
Why is that so many advertisers have chosen not to fund GB News? Is it because of a "sinister" plot against the channel by #StopFundingHate supporters, as suggested in this article? Or might there be additional reasons for big brands to steer clear? 1/ archive.ph/2022.10.28-132…
Just last week, GB News was called out by leading UK Jewish organisations over its repeated use of a term widely associated with antisemitism. Is it any surprise that responsible advertisers might not want to be aligned with this kind of rhetoric? /2 theguardian.com/politics/2022/…
Soon after GB News launched, one of its own contributors quit, accusing the channel of "demonising trans people at every opportunity". Many LGBT-inclusive companies will be mindful of the risks of supporting an outlet with this track record. /3
OpIndia is notorious for publishing toxic content like this. Now the Guardian is having to appeal to them to end their public attacks on a respected Guardian reporter.
If you work in advertising, today would be a good day to exclude Opindia.com from your online ads:
"Spreading hatred against Muslims within the majority community is what was happening there... I quit. I did not become a journalist to spread hatred" - ex OpIndia employee newslaundry.com/2020/01/03/fak…
Reading this Daily Mail headline - and the related wave of UK media coverage - you might easily get the impression that a teacher was jailed for mis-gendering his student...
Despite what the Daily Mail's headline might imply, the defendant was jailed for contempt of court, after defying a High Court order not to attend his workplace while under suspension pending the outcome of a disciplinary review: reuters.com/article/factch…
Britain urgently needs a media that informs rather than misleading us. It's no surprise that the UK press has regularly been found to be the least trusted in Europe reuters.com/article/factch…
Hi @AudibleUK - there's some more background here on the toxic Islamophobic "Love Jihad" conspiracy theory, which the Daily Mail has now been promoting: theguardian.com/world/2022/jan…
It's worth contrasting the Daily Mail's inflammatory article with the BBC's reporting of the same shocking story: bbc.co.uk/news/world-asi…