i was trying so hard not to stop doing this bit while on the call.
i am god's most misinformationest soldier, which is why he sends me his most gullible j**rn*l*sts
proof of trolling:
i am dead serious about this, i will actually real-name dox to a serious journalist. beyond the memes, it is embarrassing for tech/crypto journalism to be this pathetic.
0 corroboration on the story and i gave 0 backup info on this.
The study looks at firms that apply and go through the H-1B process, it then uses an exogenous variation (an external factor), in the case the winning or losing of the lottery to study the randomized effects of gaining or losing the talent.
Note their moderate claim: Overall, our results show that access to high-skill labor is a critical determinant
of success for start-up firms.
Some basic background.
Then we get the mechanism, ok we are going to study the effect of acquisition of foreign talent and remove selection effects by isolating for firms that applied for the lottery. Makes sense.
Note immediately how there is NO mention of a replacement versus an American worker. This is *for firms that decided they wanted a foreign worker* the effects on receiving that foreign worker.
No heterosexual man has ever said "Yeah I'm into her, but her career isn't going well -- I'm not sure it'll work out between us."
Ever.
In all of written history, never has a heterosexual man wished a woman had a more developed 'career'. You're imposing this on yourself.
Sure, men are attracted to some degree competence (way less than women).
I'd like a wife who can handle having 5 kids, vacation logistics, being a socialite to some degree, helping me with ends.
If you interpret this as "I should grind for L5 at Google" you've lost the plot.
It's not a *bad* thing *ceteris paribus* to be an L5 at Google or a [successful title] at [successful company].
The issue is it is never *ceteris paribus* -- simply, the timeline of motherhood does not care about the latest company 'sprint' or your 'promotion track'. At all.
Marxists are literally incapable of communicating through their own thoughts and words, you might not like it but this is what peak efficient Marxist communication looks like:
Sir, this is a Marxist look at the Information Era and the newly crowned class of 'Wifi Money' the same way Marx analyzed the newly crowned class of the 'bourgeoisie'.
Because after dinner, everyone ought to counter-signal. So I tried it, well, the rest is history: I'm still counter-signaling, I love it, and he introduced me to something really good.
And I know now the next question! Knowing you, being the interviewer that you are, digging in deep all the time, you will say now, "What does your wife think about that?"
Let me ask you something: when BAP has introduced me to counter-signalling, what is the redpill influencooor going to say? He is not going to say, "BAP made a mistake," because BAP never makes a mistake, so therefore it is okay.
Witnessed several young teens who hang out playing on phones put their lips ON the water fountain, what does it mean?
Very unsettling!
Hypothesizing now that this may be due to the lack of a pertinent and present mother figure in their life; having been bottle-fed they view any nipple-like object that dispenses liquid as a mother.
The implications are immense.
Before the decade is out all drinks, particularly caffeinated energy drinks like Monster, Redbull, etc will be sold near-exclusively in bottles equipped with faux-nipples.
Perhaps even administered by nurses directly into the mouths of these sensitive young men.