2/ If there isn't anything happening near you, start thinking about what you can do to ensure that next year there is
>
3/ Have a read & a think about the case for a National Men's Health Strategy. There is a gender-specific strategy for women's health but not men's, despite men having worse health outcomes, shorter life expectancy, less healthy lifestyles & less support. menshealthforum.org.uk/strategy-case
4/ Have a read & a think about the case for a Male Victims Strategy. At the moment, male survivors of abuse, domestic & sexual violence, stalking & other intimate crimes are tacked on as afterthoughts to the "Violence Against Women and Girls" strategy. menandboyscoalition.org.uk/ivamb-strategy/
5/ Have a look at @RichardvReeves's book Of Boys and Men. We have our differences, but of all the crisis Of masculinity books I have read (and God knows I've read a few) it's the best new one in decades
6/ Reach out to a mate or a family member you haven't heard from in a while. Yes I know he says he's fine. He might not be.
7/ Book yourself in to come to Manchester next Friday & join us at the National Conference on Men & Boys Issues, 'No Man Is An Island.' It's going to be great. eventbrite.co.uk/e/no-man-is-an…
8/ If nothing else, just don't be a dick about it, eh?
Some observations on the International Men's Day debate that's just ended in the House of Commons 🧵
First up, I was one of the people who last year took issue with the focus of @NickFletcherMP in the same debate. Credit where due, this year he made the case really well for a national men's health strategy & a minister for men & raised loads of excellent & correct points. >
Quick personal opinion on this one @NickFletcherMP - I think the strongest argument against a MoM is that it implies a false equivalence to the role of the Minister for Women & Equalities. That is a fair & legitimate objection. So I think the full title >
First, let me say there is loads in here I agree with, most of the report is scraped from masculinities research by the likes of RW Connell (which I happily lean on heavily myself), and makes the case that boys are still socialized into restrictive & destructive gender scripts, >
especially cultures of violence, misogyny & oppressive hierarchies, and I fully agree that this can and must change. I also fully agree with the aspirations for gender equity & fully agree that the welfare & wellbeing of men & boys is fully interlinked & >
A thread of thoughts about this case, with lots of content warnings for sexual violence & abuse. > lbc.co.uk/news/horny-24-…
Firstly & most importantly, Imogen Brooke has been cleared by a jury who heard all the evidence & I didn't, so nothing I say is meant to suggest the jury got it wrong, I have no reason to say so. Nonetheless the case has thrown up some extremely important & noteworthy issues. >
First, a technical point. Brooke was not charged with rape as rape requires a penis. This legal distinction is hurtful to victims of this offence, who usually do consider themselves to have been raped. Legal academic Siobhan Weare has written well on this cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Even if there were any truth in this (which I v much doubt) I cannot conceive of any possible harm or negative consequence to this. Have you seen the shit that goes down in early years reading books?
Can't believe we're terrifying children with the thought that a tiger might come in at tea-time, trash the house & drink all daddy's beer.
A Cat in a Hat turning up when parents are out and throwing the goldfish on the floor?
"This bear is from Peru & likes marmalade sandwiches,"
"OK"
"This bear speaks in zen koans, likes honey and his best friends & a donkey, a piglet, a tiger and a kangaroo."
"OK"
"This bear likes to be known as 'they' instead of he or she."
"WAAAAAAAH!"