Share this page!

Hicksy Profile picture
Twitter logo
Nov 20 • 11 tweets • 4 min read
I have not tried this before but have seen it work for some
Pls will you follow me to:
-Raise awareness of the booster approval issues
-Share my petitions:
--Remove 💉 manufacturer indemnity
---Open an inquiry into covid contracts
--Change the legislation used for Lockdowns
👇
BA1 booster approval, despite lower performance than original
Lack of transparency from MHRA

BA5/5 booster approval based on a different vaccine

👇
This petition means the vaccine injured now know they can claim against the manufacturers using the Consumer Protection Act.
Next step, make the manufacturers pay, not the government
Petition: Remove indemnity from the manufacturers of covid-19 vaccines petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6191…
👇
An important petition from @MaxSH2022 who was harmed by the vaccine & wants reform of the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme
Petition: Reform the Vaccine Damage Payment with payments based on the scale of disability petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6275…
👇
Many covid contracts were clearly corrupt, a full enquiry is required
Petition: Launch an independent Public Inquiry into Government & NHS Covid-19 spending petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6229…
#torycorruption
👇
It frustrates me that this petition has not gathered momentum.
The PHA was used to implement Lockdowns with zero scrutiny, it could be used again immediately
Petition: Remove the urgency procedure from the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act1984 petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6184…
👇
Petition: Do not pass the Online Safety Bill and seek a different approach petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6216…
👇
Petition: Remove anti-protest measures from the Public Order Bill petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6173…
👇
Petition: Require binding referendums on petitions that receive over 1 million signatures petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6203…
Petition: Introduce a windfall tax on pharmaceutical companies’ Covid-19 related profits petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6171…
Petition: Public Order Bill: Remove powers to issue SDPOs for unconvicted protestors petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6170…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Hicksy

Hicksy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hicksyalex

Hicksy Profile picture
Nov 22
There are a few things we can do to make a difference:
-respond to the @GOVUK covid inquiry
-tell people the stories of the vaccine injured & bereaved
-tell people the poor process the booster approvals have been through
-sign relevant petitions
-join @Togetherdec
👇
Understand the plight of the vaccine injured & bereaved watch this video from @OracleFilmsUK
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion
oraclefilms.com
Or read individual stories here @VIBUK1 @ukcvfamily
Wear a @VIBUK1 ribbon
👇 Image
Tell everyone that
@moderna_tx BA1 booster was approved despite negative efficacy
@Pfizer_UK BA1 data is not available & the PAR is missing key information

@pfizer BA4/5 booster is approved based on BA1 performance

👇
Read 11 tweets
Hicksy Profile picture
Nov 21
Revealed: Why Britain’s regulator missed the link between the AstraZeneca jab and rare blood clots telegraph.co.uk/global-health/…
Perhaps they were too busy enabling to regulate?
“We only really learn about benefit risk in clinical use, and we knew there would be a vast influx of reports of side effects, no effective medicine or vaccine is without them”
Read 4 tweets
Hicksy Profile picture
Nov 19
New bivalent Covid vaccines DON'T give people better immunity mol.im/a/11356647 via @MailOnline
I have been saying this since August....
I'm not sure why they need "new research"
@moderna_tx's own report published in June 2022 (before they were approved) showed their bivalent booster was less effective than the original
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
@MHRAgovuk cherry picked antibody data & ignored efficacy to approve Image
Read 4 tweets
Hicksy Profile picture
Nov 17
@MHRAgovuk have now published the Public Assessment Reports for the Pfizer & Moderna BA1 bivalent boosters, they only did this after escalation to the @ICOnews. They have still failed to respond to the remainder of my FOI.
👇
Moderna
products.mhra.gov.uk/search/?search…
Pfizer
products.mhra.gov.uk/search/?search…
They have been approved for anti-body production only, not efficacy.
The fact efficacy data for Moderna was lower for the BA1 booster than the original vaccine has been ignored in the report.
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Risks include myocarditis, pericarditis & Vaccine Associated Enhanced Disease
Missing information includes
-use in pregnancy & breastfeeding
-long term safety
-use on immunocompromised subjects
-use on frail subjects
-use on subjects with autoimmune or inflammatory disorders
👇
Read 7 tweets
Hicksy Profile picture
Nov 16
The government have confirmed that the vaccine injured can sue the manufacturers (however we would pay the bill)
"This is from the The Human Medicines (Coronavirus and Influenza) (Amendment) Regulations 2020"
The explanatory notes are much clearer than the Regulations
👇
legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1125…
"These Regulations extend that immunity to the person placing the unauthorised medicine on the market. The immunity does not however extend to specified requirements under consumer protection legislation👇
nor to where a person who would otherwise be able to claim the immunity is responsible for a sufficiently serious breach of the conditions attached by the licensing authority to the product’s supply (regulations 6 and 29)."
Read 11 tweets
Hicksy Profile picture
Nov 15
🪡 Petition: Remove indemnity from the manufacturers of covid-19 vaccines petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6191…
The government have responded:
Their initial statement makes it clear that commercial interests outweigh public interest
👇
"The Government cannot comment on the terms on which COVID-19 vaccines were supplied as these are confidential."
"Indemnities do not prevent individuals from pursuing legal claims for compensation." Is true however
👇
1. If the government is liable they will fight tooth and nail to protect their financial risk therefore individuals fighting claims will have 2 opponents, the manufacturer & the government
2. If the government pay, the tax payer pays
👇
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

:(