A carbon market system that allows secrecy, downgraded the rights of indigenous peoples, and will permit fake carbon credits to potentially be counted twice.
*BUT* thanks to the UN High Level Expert Group on Net Zero there will be more scrutiny than ever on carbon markets. The dodgy system set up here won't be given an easy ride, that's for sure.
*AND* the language sent a very clear signal that these credits should not be used in this way, meaning any company might face real reputational risks if it did so. What company would even want to?
This is a silver lining - it may drive finance to climate action but prevent carbon offsetting displacing real climate action.
We may yet see emissions driven down and temperatures limited by this mechanism.
Let's stand the #Article6 outcome next to the other bits of #COP27: there is significant real-world momentum on cutting emissions (more than the talks actually reflect), and the space for dodgy carbon credits has narrowed, ever so slightly.
#Article6 may play a role in helping drive climate action - we'll see next year as things that were kicked into long grass come back.
In the system allowing trading country-country, "confidentiality" remains, meaning any information about credits can be hidden.
In the system that allows countries to sell emissions reductions to companies there is now to be a consultation on views on how emissions removals can be used. Removals mean for example forests that absorb carbon or technologies that suck it out of the atmosphere.
But that consultation no longer asks for views on the human rights impacts on indigenous peoples of using land that way.
"Mitigation contribution" emissions cuts are clearly only intended to be a way for companies to finance climate action - but they shouldn't be using them as an offset. The UN can't stop them from doing so, but it does make it reputationally toxic.
The outcome kicks many things down the road to 2023 and 2024 - we shouldn't expect the market for countries to sell emissions cuts to companies to become a reality any time soon.
We may still be discussing all these issues in Dubai #COP28 next year.
While there was grumbling about long queues for decent food #COP27, climate change has been pushing people into malnutrition and serious hunger in many places in the world this yr. 🌽 🚜
Nature also featured heavily, both for the impacts of climate change on it, but also how it can help absorb and store carbon. 🦅 🌳
As we saw on @SkyNews Climate Show w/@tomheapmedia climate change is having devastating impacts on food production around world.
My headline takeaway from the new versions of the texts out overnight:
Some improvements and changes. There is a signal that emissions reductions that can be double counted shouldn't be used as carbon credits/offsets. But it's only a signal.
Avoided emissions - claiming some emissions that would have happened now won't (e.g. that forest over there was going to be cut down, now it won't - devilishly hard to prove) - back on table.
This zombie concept won't die & is bad news for integrity of carbon markets
In Article 6.4 avoided emissions also back on table.
No rules on removals (whether carbon taken out of atmosphere stays out) - supervisory body is asked to go away and come back with recommendations on these.