Purely coincidental that last week I wrote about thawing UK-EU relations and what might come next, given the Conservative Party is now seemingly rerunning their Brexit wars, but immodestly I do think this worth a look to those reporting developments. encompass-europe.com/comment/a-new-…
No surprise that the CBI would point out business wants / needs strong EU ties, and the usually impressive DG Tony Danker is right that “the best guarantor of Brexit is an economy that grows” as well as the need to end the NI Protocol stand-off ft.com/content/ab2281…
There was a brief note in yesterday's Sunday Times report on UK-EU relations that Number 10 officials thought a Northern Ireland Protocol solution satisfying ERG and Commission was possible. Good luck, as they say, with that.
And as I said yesterday evening, Conservative Party splits on the EU appear to be between cakeists and fundamentalists, both ignoring the lessons of six and a half years. Realists are once again most notable by their absence.
Maybe worth going back to some basics that we should have learned about trade and the EU relationship since 2016? Must confess #tradetwitter has not been altogether successful in establishing these in the face of fantasy international relations...
I think these were the two key paragraphs of my article on evolving UK-EU relations. It may take a change of government to insert reality, except the Northern Ireland Protocol needs urgent attention. Hopes among Brexit veterans are not high... encompass-europe.com/comment/a-new-… /end
Extras... From Politico London Playbook - "Being a CPTPP member would make striking agreements with the EU more complicated." - not necessarily true.
From a May-era Advisor... not negotiable or supported (hence cakeist v fundamentalist)
And a reminder that if the Conservative Party cannot agree a compromise on the Northern Ireland Protocol with the EU, that also satisfies unionists, then probably no CPTPP accession, no Biden state visit. Which would be frankly, international political humiliation.
I know generally we prefer breathless accounts of which anonymous politician briefed who, but we'd really do better if it was understood that EU relations over the Northern Ireland Protocol is a central issue for government in the next 4 months, currently one without a solution.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Under my leadership the United Kingdom will not pursue any relationship with Europe that relies on alignment with EU laws" tells us a lot, none of it good, about this PM. Because a strong leader who understood business wouldn't say it. Even before we get to Northern Ireland.
Reminder, we align with EU laws in all sorts of ways, and that will continue. We aren't going to have special UK laws for cars, aircraft, and all manner of internationally traded products. Ok, plenty of these go wider than the EU, but the point is we rule take.
Perhaps we should be talking more about the "relationship" part, but then we have a Trade and Cooperation Agreement which laws down lots of rules for trade, so presumably that doesn't count. Which is when this becomes a debate about silly semantics.
Fault lines within the Conservative Party over the EU relationship, what we might call cakeists versus fundamentalists. There can be no winner because neither side is living in the real world.
Cakeists briefing a 'Swiss style' relationship with the EU seem to mean one with few trade barriers but no alignment of regulations, and no freedom of movement. They assume the EU will give us this deal to keep the fundamentalists away. They won't, they haven't to anyone else.
Fundamentalists say there must be no alignment of regulations with the EU, full freedom for trade deals, no compromise on scrapping the Northern Ireland Protocol. But every exporter to the EU takes some rules, and breaking treaty will stop trade deals like joining CPTPP.
Since I've only just written about the upturn in UK EU relations, maybe worth reading the Times in conjunction with this... encompass-europe.com/comment/a-new-…
Just saying I don't think what the UK government may think is a Swiss style relationship with the EU necessarily bears much scrutiny. You don't just remove trade barriers by saying "Switzerland", and nothing will easily be negotiated. Maybe time to re-involve experts?
Starting to get pretty angry with the Brexit enthusiasts who having made a right royal mess of their vision are now shrugging their shoulders and saying it has been ruined by others and the UK is inexorably declining.
The search for the fantasy Brexit has been at the cost of running the actual UK in the actual world. Be in the EU, don't be in the EU, but be in the real world. And if you advocated taking back control, then take responsibility for the compromises that will require.
The Johnson government, supported by Conservative MPs, chose this Brexit, this Northern Ireland protocol. Nobody forced them to accept this particular relationship. It was their choice, and their choice alone. If that failed, change it, stop whining about it.
Made use of a couple of Brussels trips to investigate what was going on beneath the still rather uneasy formal UK-EU relations, and discovered a change of tone and the building of new networks of informal connections. encompass-europe.com/comment/a-new-…
Coming from a different angle, and indeed different country, @HeleneBismarck finds similarly that "there is at least a chance that we will look back on 2022 as the year when Britons and other Europeans finally escaped a downward spiral" theguardian.com/world/commenti…
But it is worth stressing that difficulties in UK-EU relations do not go away just because of changing tone, in Brussels this is often summed up in one word, "Switzerland", to indicate that no special deals should be assumed however much warmer the words become.
Goods that we make very well include cars, but that's endangered both by trade barriers and move to EVs, specialist food and drink products like Scotch, pharmaceuticals. Reasonable to ask, what products will we make more of with improved skills?
Then again we haven't been a world-leading manufacturer for quite a number of years, whereas we are a services superpower. Though we have a good mixture in truth. Could use more exports, who wouldn't, but what they might be is far from obvious.