Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture
Nov 21, 2022 โ€ข 19 tweets โ€ข 7 min read โ€ข Read on X
Were the russians in Makiivka executed?

No. And I will explain all the facts in this thread ๐Ÿงต:

Yesterday the @nytimes published an article about the dead russians in Makiivka... and didn't bother to ask a single military expert, officer, weapons expert, or Ukrainian.
1/n
Instead they went to an Assistant Adjunct Professor for Epidemiology at UC Berkeley, who is quoted: โ€œIt looks like most of them were shot in the head,โ€ Dr. Rohini Haar, medical adviser at Physicians for Human Rights, said in an interview.

Wrong. And a military expert would
2/n
have told the NY Times that this is nonsense.

First: here are the videos of the before and after of the incident. Video 2 in the linked tweet is before and Video 3 is after.

3/n
Here is a screenshot from Video 2.
There is a Ukrainian machine gunner on the ground (red circle). I added his line of fire in yellow.
We can also spot a toy car and a tree trunk. Those are important later.
There are two additional Ukrainian soldiers in this video, but they
4/n Image
will move before the next video so I did not mark them. Here is a video taken by a Ukrainian soldier that participated in the events.

Now let's analyze this video.
5/n
Here is the machine gunner from earlier. He uses a PKM machine gun. The machine gun is level with the heads of the dead russians later. His job is to keep the surrendering russians in check.

And again we see the toy car.
6/n Image
The toy car, a children's swing and to the right another Ukrainian soldier (which the NY Times forgot to count).

And this Ukrainian soldier doesn't have his rifle up. He is not expecting any resistance.
7/n Image
Two more Ukrainian troops. One with his foot on the aforementioned trunk, the other to the side behind the machine gunner. Both with their rifles pointing down. They too aren't ready for any shootout.

So we have five Ukrainian soldiers, with one filming, three having their
8/n Image
rifles down, and only the machine gunner ready to fire.

If we add those four Ukrainian soldiers to the overhead shot we see that only one had a clear shot of the russian (green circle) that came out last and attacked the Ukrainians. And that the filming soldier (blue circle)
9/n Image
was the attackers target (he is the injured soldier at the end of his video).

This is the approximate view of the machine gunner and his line of fire in yellow. Also note the wall section, the position of the 10th russian soldiers, & the hands of the first russian soldiers.
10/n Image
If we add the position of the Ukrainian troops and their lines of fire over a screenshot of the aftermath video, you can see that two Ukrainian troops and the machine gunner had the russians on the ground in their line of fire. Only one Ukrainian soldier had a clear shot of
11/n Image
attacking russian. Once this russian attacks, the soldier filming drops to the ground injured and the soldier, who had his foot on the trunk moves forward to engage. And you can hear the machine gun starting to fire - but more of that later.
12/n ImageImage
After the shooting.

Bullet holes have appeared on the wall behind the dead russians. How did these get there if the russians were "shot in the head"??
13/n Image
And if the russians were shot were they lay, how come that the 10th did move behind the wall?

14/n Image
"shot in the head", but the helmets didn't move? I can show you videos from the war in Syria and the Armenia-Azerbaijan war: a headshot with a Kalashnikov at that range and the helmet flies off with half the skull and most of the brain.
15/n Image
These russian were hit by the much more powerful bullets of the PKM machine gun. How powerful?
Well, the first russian soldier's left hand got hit by one of the machine guns' 7.62ร—54mm bullets...

The destructive power and rate of fire of the PKM machine gun alone was enough
16/n Image
to kill all these russians. It was not an execution, it was not a war crime.
It was a team of 5 Ukrainian troops, four of which weren't doing their job but fooling around, who tried to take 11 russian prisoner. One russian decided to rather die than surrender, and the only
17/n
Ukrainian soldier ready to fire did as is expected in such a situation. The soldier filming goes down = the machine gunner fires to neutralize any threat. That's it.

If the NY Times had asked a military or weapons expert instead of epidemiologists and lawyers, they wouldn't
18/n
have provided the russian propaganda with this gift.

If you still have doubts: here is a PKM machine gun being fired, and after that I added three times the audio from the last second of the Ukrainian soldier's video.

You be the judge what we hear in that last second.
19/end

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with Thomas C. Theiner

Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @noclador

Jan 29
As many people do not realize the importance of ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Greenland for the defence of the ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ US, I will explain it:

โ€ข ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ chinese nuclear submarines

If you watched The Hunt for Red October, you already know the reason the US has been, is, will be worried about enemy submarines.
1/24 Image
Enemy submarines operating off the US East Coast would sink US ships, blockade US ports, launch cruise missiles at US cities, and disrupt US supply and reinforcement transports to Europe.

Today russia's Northern Fleet has 5ร— cruise missile and 9ร— attack submarines at
2/24 Image
Murmansk, which in case of war would sail towards the central Atlantic.

But to get there the russian submarines must pass the GIUK gap or Greenland-Iceland-UK gap.

During the Cold War the US Navy and US Air Force operated P-3C Orion Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA) and
3/24 Image
Read 24 tweets
Jan 29
Top 3 countries in Europe:

Ordering new main battle tanks:
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland: 180ร— K2, 250ร— M1A2 SEPv3
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy: 240ร— KF51 Panther
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany: 123ร— Leopard 2A8, 17ร— Leopard 2A7 A1
1/5
Ordering new infantry fighting vehicles:
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland: 1,000+ Borsuk
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy: 679ร— KF41 Lynx
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czechia: 172ร— CV90 Mk IV
2/5
Ordering new fighter jets:
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany: 38ร— Eurofighter, 35ร— F-35 Lightning II
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland: 64ร— F-35 Lightning II
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy: 24ร— Eurofighter, 25ร— F-35 Lightning II

(Sweden's order of 60ร— Gripen E happened more than 10 years ago)
3/5
Read 5 tweets
Jan 29
After the end of the Cold War ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden demilitarized #Gotland island, the key strategic location in the Baltic Sea.

After russia invaded Ukraine in 2014, Sweden remilitarized the island. The new Gotland Regiment (P 18), an armored formation, is a signal to enemy and allies,
1/9 Image
that Sweden WILL DEFEND Gotland.

Sweden also formed a second amphibious battalion, ordered Blekinge-class submarines, bought Patriot air defence systems, grows its air force with Gripen E fighters, ordered modernized RBS 15 Mk. IV anti-ship missiles, etc. etc.
2/9 Image
In short: Sweden is investing in its defence, with equipment orders and upgrades, as well as unit formations and relocations that signal the country's intent to defend all of its territory.

Are the Swedish forces strong enough to defeat a russian invasion 4-5 years after the
3/9 Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 27
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark

They last added a frigate to their Navy in 2011. They plan to add the next by around 2032 (!).

This is an unserious clown-show!

Alas, they are just as unserious as ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช. Governments in Europe refuse to accept that we are in an emergency far
1/14
worse than any in the last 80 years.

โ€ข russia is invading Ukraine, which will fall if we do not triple our military aid.
โ€ข China will invade Taiwan, which will cut off all trade with Japan and South Korea
โ€ข Trump is gonna break all bonds with Europe, and invade Panama
2/14
This means Europe can no longer rely on the highly trained and exquisitely equipped 100,000 US troops based in Europe to defend us.

Furthermore since russia invaded Ukraine the US Army has continuously two armored brigades and one light brigade on rotation in Europe, which
3/14
Read 15 tweets
Jan 25
Combat brigade reductions of #NATO nations 1989 vs. 2025:

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ -52ร—
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช -40ร—
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท -27ร—
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช -25ร—
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง -24ร—
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น -17ร—
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด -13ร—
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ -11ร—
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ -9ร—
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ -5ร—
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช -5ร—
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ -1ร—

A detailed break down follows, and also details about the former Warsaw Pact members: ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด
1/28
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA 1989: 110ร— brigades
โ€ข Army: 55ร— (34ร— Armor/Mech., 14ร— Infantry, 4ร— Airborne, 3ร— Air Assault)
โ€ข National Guard: 52ร— (30ร— Armor/Mech., 22ร— Infantry)
โ€ข Reserve: 3ร— (1ร— Mech., 2ร— Infantry)

Of the Army brigades 17ร— were based in Europe, 3ร— in South Korea, 1ร— in Panama.
2/28
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA 2025: 58ร— brigades (-52ร— vs. 1989)
โ€ข Army: 31ร— (11ร— Armor/Mech., 6ร— Stryker, 6ร— Infantry, 5ร— Airborne, 3ร— Air Assault)
โ€ข National Guard: 27ร— (5ร— Armor/Mech., 2ร— Stryker, 20ร— Infantry)

The reduction of US Armor/Mech. brigades is staggering: from 65ร— to just 16ร—.
3/28
Read 30 tweets
Nov 6, 2024
What does Trump's victory mean for NATO - listed from most certain to worst:

1) Operation Atlantic Resolve, which protects Eastern Europe since russia's invasion of Ukraine, will almost certainly end.
2) The only two US Army brigades in Europe (2nd Cavalry Regiment in ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช &
1/4
173rd Airborne Brigade in ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช) will very likely return to the US.
3) US Air Force units in Europe will likely be reduced, but I doubt Trump will close the bases... he needs them to bomb Iran.
4) US nuclear sharing with ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท will likely end, leaving Europe without
2/4
tactical nuclear weapons.
5) Trump could pull US officers and assets from NATO's command structure... which would cripple NATO commands like the Allied Air Command, Allied Land Command, Joint Forces Command Naples, etc. leaving NATO unable to command forces to fight a russian
3/4
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(