In dismissing CIA evidence of Lee Harvey Oswald visiting Mexico City in 1963, FBI Director J Edgar Hoover said, "it appears there is a second person who was at the Soviet Embassy down there." One of many examples of Oswald being impersonated pre-assassination 🧵 #CIAKilledJFK
Particularly compelling eg: testimony of Marita Lorenz, long-time CIA asset to House Select Committee on Assassinations. She met *a* Lee Harvey Oswald at a Miami safehouse and several CIA training camps in Florida 1960/61. When Oswald himself was playing defector in the USSR...
Lorenz was threatened with perjury as her timeline conflicted with Oswald's presence in the USSR, and repeatedly invited to reconsider her testimony. She refused. HSCA asked "how we come up with two Lee Harvey Oswalds?". They didn't consider the same question themselves.
Casting Lorenz's under-oath testimony aside, in June 1960 after Oswald (or, one of them) skidaddled to Moscow, Hoover wrote to the State Department warning them of "a possibility that an imposter is using Oswald's birth certificate."
Fast forward to January 1961, and a "Lee Oswald" buys trucks in New Orleans. Sales order names him, and organization "Friends of Democratic Cuba". Which was founded by ex-FBI fascist Guy Banister, who was a key subject of interest in Jim Garrison's probe of the JFK assassination.
Two months later, a State Department official wrote to another informing them “there is an imposter using Oswald’s identification data” and recommending LHO's passport be given to him personally to prevent this happening again...#CIAkilledJFK
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵: So, @wiczipedia has registered as a Foreign Agent, due to her work for The Centre for Informational Resilience. Her FARA filing confirms that she's working for British intelligence - and the knives are out for @TheGrayzoneNews at the highest levels in London.
CIR first came to my attention in August when cofounder @rwdburley libelled The Grayzone as a "Russian propaganda outfit", and called for YouTube to deplatform and censor us and anyone (such as @rustyrockets) who dare platform us.
A bit of digging revealed Burley was a veteran Foreign Office "counter disinformation" expert, and "designed, implemented, and led" Open Information Partnership, the flagship component of a multi-million Foreign Office effort to "weaken the Russian state's influence."
In late September 1963, Sylvia Odio was visited at home in Dallas by three men, one of whom was introduced as "Leon Oswald". When President John F Kennedy was assassinated in that city two months later, she realised this individual was Lee Harvey Oswald...#CIAKilledJFK
Her other visitors were right-wing Cubans, who over the course of a 20 minute conversation conducted largely in Spanish told Sylvia they were friends of her father, then-imprisoned in Cuba, and "Leon Oswald" might joing the anti-Castro resistance movement....#CIAKilledJFK
The very next day, one of her Cuban visitors telephoned to say "Leon Oswald" was a "kind of nuts" former Marine and crack marksman who thought President Kennedy should've been killed after the failed CIA-orchestrated Bay of Pigs invasion #CIAKilledJFK
Another suspicious aspect of #FTXGate: SBF raised billions from top tier VC funds despite chaotic if not totally non-existent financial records and many obvious red flags surrounding its operations. I think this could be a potential indication of CIA involvement. Brief 🧵:
First bankruptcy court filing by FTX's new CEO identifies welter of insane issues within the company and Alameda. Much of this would've been clear to VCs. What's more, fundraising proposals submitted to these firms consisted of crap self-authored excel spreadsheets.
Some interpret VCs still investing despite this as sign they bought into media-created mythos surrounding SBF. I'm not so sure. VCs might not always make good investments but their due diligence is usually very strong indeed, and this stuff would typically make them run a mile.
Must-read thread here. It bears repeating - literally *every* commercial venure in which @SBF_FTX was involved, was deeply criminal. As such, the likelihood @_AidForUkraine was a scam is essentially certain. The only question is how.
It very much appears SBF was effectively a frontman acting on the behalf of others. Most business decisions were conducted via private chat, and *emojis* (!!!), with messages set to automatically delete after a "short period". Someone (or something) else was actually in charge.
Notably, it's unclear who was actually employed by which company, and when. Some employees cannot now be located - did they ever exist in the first place, or have they been disappeared one way or another?
Because OF. FUCKING. COURSE. @TheIntercept was taking millions off Sam Bankman-Fried to run PR for his "biosafety and pandemic prevention" initiatives, and the collapse of FTX and his exposure as a criminal has left a "significant hole" in its budget.
Ah well, back to sending bizarre, borderline threatening begging letters week in, week out again.
Must-read thread here from @Angie_Rasmussen on some of SBF's biosecurity investments, including $1.2 million given to a pair of lunatic to produce a hysterical whitepaper calling for the banning of virology/virologists. I'm not making this up...
THREAD: Some people are charging off in wild directions re FTX/Ukraine, way further than existing evidence. This is extremely unhelpful, as detractors can discredit and suppress accusations of wrongdoing right out the gate. Here's what we *actually* know. Please dig further:
On March 14th, @_AidForUkraine was launched by Ukraine’s Ministry of Digital Transformation and FTX. At this point, Kiev had reportedly already received - and spent - over $100 million in bitcoin donations. By April 1st, Aid for Ukraine allegedly raised $70 million.
On April 6th, @_AidForUkraine revised this figure to "over $60 million" in donations, for reasons unclear. This total has remained unchanged ever since, despite the portal being open all along. On April 14th, the first breakdown of spending was published.