Maybe fuelled by recent claims that #Neolithic hunters were too "simple" and thus not capable of cultural achievements, there seems to be a misunderstanding about the "#pottery" part in #PrePotteryNeolithic (PPN).
They actually *did* use vessels. Just other vessels.
A short 🧵:
Well known and clearly associated with #PrePotteryNeolithic contexts are e.g. #StoneVessels from different places like #KörtikTepe in Turkey or #JerfElAhmar and #TellAbr in Syria as well as (often fragmented though) many more related sites (including Göbekli Tepe by the way).
Bringing up the #GöbekliTepe fragments since they illustrate why finding complete vessels is comparably rare: the material was too valuable to not re-use it.
We also have to consider a variety of other vessels made from material simply not preserved, e.g. leather containers or wood and bark #vessels - like the exceptional examples found with Late Neolithic/Chalcolihtic #Ötzi or the Bronze Age #Egtved Girl's burial in Denmark:
The point is: They could - and *did* make vessels.
Just not pottery vessels. Probably because of the fragility of this material - which may not be the most practical thing for highly mobile people repeatedly packing up all their stuff and moving on to the next place.
#PrePotteryNeolithic hunters likely were aware of these properties - they did experiment w/ related materials, as numerous figurines (e.g. from #NevaliCori), sculptures (e.g. from #AinGhazal), even a few small vessels made of gypsum plaster (e.g. from #Karahantepe) demonstrate.
Even more: Already in their seminal works on #Neolithic#lime and #gypsum plasters, Kingery et al. (quite fittingly) described this technology as "The Beginnings of #Pyrotechnology" (J. Field Arch. 2(1/2), 1975 + J. Field Arch. 15, 1988):
The term #PrePotteryNeolithic was coined by K. Kenyon at the type site of #Jericho (Tell es-Sultan) to distinguish #Neolithic layers lacking any pottery from those w/ such implements.
It thus is a technical classification applying to this specific region - not a cultural stage.
In fact do we indeed know of earlier examples for #pottery. Pottery #vessels - e.g. from Siberia, Japan, Korea, and China - dating as far back as 18,000 years.
Interestingly often associated with hunter-fisher cultures (with a lower degree of mobility).
Thanks for your great feedback! Happily taking up some of the suggestions:
#Gourds e.g. has been pointed out as another organic vessel resource - not leaving much of a trace in the archaeological record. W/ view to ethnographic analogies this indeed has to be considered as well.
As well as #basketry. In fact, some ornaments on early pottery vessels do indeed seem to somehow reproduce the appearance of woven surfaces.
And not to forget #OstrichEggs! Many known finds of vessels made out of such eggs, with a wide geographic and chronological variety - including e.g. Neolithic Jordan, Sudan, predynastic Egypt and many more. Well into recent history.
The path to #pottery (vessel) production really is a fascinating cultural development.
A recent volume on "The Emergence of Pottery in West Asia" (eds. A. Tsuneki, O. Nieuwenhuyse, & St. Campbell, Oxbow 2017) gives an overview on the current discussion:
Olivier Nieuwenhuyse's and Stuart Campbell's synthesis on "The Emergence of #Pottery in #WestAsia" in the same volume e.g. makes a great introductory evening reading:
Buried with an aurochs and, among other animals, canid and marten bones - the fascinating case of a 12,000 y/o early #Neolithic burial reported from #ÇemkaHöyük in Türkiye's 🇹🇷 Upper Tigris Basin - interpreted as possible "#shaman":
E. Kodaş et al., A “shaman” burial from the PPNA settlement of Çemka Höyük, Upper Tigris Basin, Turkiye, L'Anthropologie in press (corrected proof 9 July 2024). 🔐
Which adds nicely to the few other rather similar "#ShamanBurials" known, like e.g. the #Natufian one from #HilazonTachtit in a small cave in northern Israel, about the same age:
(Forgot to alt-text the image, so here we go: Photo of the so-called shaft scene in Lascaux Cave showing a bison, a man lying in front of it, and a a bird-figure on a stick underneath. There's an additional line at the man's feet and another one crossing the bison's back.)
For those interested: The "bird on a stick" has been discussed as possibly representing a #SpearThrower.
Of course, the phallus-flashing guy gets all the headlines.
Well, it *is* quite a picturesque scene - one fitting #Neolithic iconographic conventions in the region & an apparently strong focus on male depictions (here's e.g. a comparable image from contemporary #GobekliTepe).
This find (calling it a #CompositeSculpture may be the more appropriate archaeological terminology) is of special interest since it represents a special type of early #Neolithic sculpture in the region also known from other sites:
4.30 o'clock. Ante meridiem. It's still dark outside, the dim light barely enough to distinguish a black thread from a white one: The muezzin just called the faithful to prayer and, probably unintentionally, the archaeologists to finally get up as well.
2/
Breakfast at such an early hour basically consists of not more than some strong tea, a slice of soft white flatbread (which will be rather dry within the hour), and a handful of olives ...