With the season finale of #Andor, I wrote about what the show tells us about the administrative state that underpins the Empire, and lessons for governing more broadly.
You could pair #Andor with James Scott's "Seeing Like a State": A bureaucracy is constructed to monitor and extract resources from distant communities, but a failure to understand local communities becomes its undoing.
The Empire's tendency toward brittle authoritarianism reflects bureaucratic incentive structures, where bland careerists become fascists to grab the rung on the ladder. See Arendt’s banality of evil: donmoynihan.substack.com/p/the-administ…
For the last few years, I have talked to my students going into public service a lot about how bureaucrats respond when they are working for corrupt regimes. Some stay loyal, but some engage in sabotage. This is also part of the story of the Empire's bureaucracy.
#Andor also deals with the organizational structure of the rebellion, which is a emergent dark network that still have not built qualities that theorists like @BrintMilward show are essential for networks: trust, means of coordination and norms of reciprocity.
The final point is about the psychological costs of the rebellion for its participants. Fighting an authoritarian regime is personally costly in a way we do not see in the Star Wars movies.
This was reflected in Luthen's speech in episode 10.
That toll of fighting the Empire related of the toll of living under totalitarianism. Maarva's speech in the finale is the complement to Luthen, but comes from the same logic: at some point the costs of fighting make sense compared to the gradual loss of freedom.
Given how Alito characterized the Dobbs leak -
"a grave betrayal" that made him and other judges "targets for assassination" - seems reasonable that he resign or be removed from the court if he did indeed leak the result of a previous high-profile decision.
The other truly eye-opening part of this story is the revelation of a covert lobbying campaign by conservatives to push the court to make more radical decisions. Alito dined with and held guest seats at the court for anti-abortion activists that were part of this campaign.
Basically: some religious billionaires wanted to overturn part of the ACA. Having failed with Congress, they turned to the courts, and seemed to have no trouble gaining access to key justices, who police their own behavior. This may be the most damaging part of the story.
In 2017, Ron Johnson refused to support Trump's tax plan until it added a specific loophole that would disproportionately benefit a small number of very rich families.
$215M would go directly to Dick & Liz Uihlein and Diane Hendricks.
In 2016 Johnson looked like he would lose to campaign finance reformer Russ Feingold. The GOP establishment had pulled money from the race. But the Uihleins and Hendricks dumped $20M into his campaign.
The net benefit of the Johnson loophole could be half a billion for them.
A Trump-appointed judge in Texas has struck down Biden's student loan relief. Biden administration promises to appeal. politico.com/news/2022/11/1…
The Judge resolved the standing issue in an especially bizarre fashion: The whole program is illegal because it did not provide benefits to two borrowers who were not eligible, and did not have a chance to comment on the proposal.
One of the plaintiffs seeking to block the program has already received 48K in debt forgiveness via cancelation of PPP loans.
The case is funded by the CEO of Home Depot and the Mercer family. (via @kenklippenstein) theintercept.com/2022/11/09/stu…
Barnes lost by 27K votes; was outspent by outside groups by $27 million.
$29 million of that spending came from one group, funded by three billionaires that Johnson personally created a massive tax break for.
No reporting of this race is complete without these basic facts.
Tempting to emphasize the dynamics of the candidates and state and so on, but the biggest reason an incumbent won is that billionaires he had given hundreds of millions of dollars to did whatever it took to make sure he could keep delivering for them. thebadgerproject.org/2022/11/07/bar…
What is $30 million to spend on a guy who netted you tax cuts of $225 million in a single year?
This seems an obviously incorrect claim, since conference was organized around allegiance to a very specific critique of academia. insidehighered.com/news/2022/11/0…
Its *chefs kiss* that this fairly reasonable critique of the event was uttered by a participant who refused to be identified. Cancel culture!! insidehighered.com/news/2022/11/0…
“more diversity, more ideological and political diversity, in the room today than in probably any other room anywhere in any of America’s top 100 universities this year.”
(h/t @caitlinmoriah)
New, from me @voxdotcom: populism and conspiracy theories puts a target on the back of public employees.
More and more will exit government jobs, undermining administrative capacity and the quality of public services. vox.com/2022/11/6/2343…
Attacks on public employees get less attention than other aspects of the culture war, and the effects will be hard to observe at first.
But it's hard to believe that people will select into public work when it means dysfunction and harassment.
I've started studying public employees about 25 years ago. They have never faced a more hostile environment. Take the following examples: vox.com/2022/11/6/2343…