By using our power as consumers to encourage big brands to stop funding toxic media, we can counteract the financial incentives that currently make hateful clickbait profitable.
If enough of us take action, we can ultimately make hate unprofitable for good.
A key part of #StopFundingHate's longer-term strategy is to work to empower as many people as possible to use the tactics that we’ve found success with.
TUI market themselves as "LGBTQ+-Friendly", but sadly their advertising tells a different story... tui.co.uk/destinations/i…
If you're a @TUIUK customer, you can take action by sending a polite & friendly message askng them to pull their Daily Mail advertising & #StopFundingHate
Morrisons say "We're proud to support our LBGT+ colleagues, customers & communities all year round" my.morrisons.com/pride/
Yet they're funding this Mail article lashing out at "the trans lobby"
This week, the Daily Mail published an article sneering at "LGBTQWERTY+ rights" & lashing out at "ridiculous rainbow armbands" archive.ph/rOW7F
But when we went to the online version of the article to identify the advertisers, we discovered something interesting... /1
We found that all of the online ads had disappeared from this toxic article - despite the fact that the Mail is heavily financially reliant on advertising to turn a profit.
Then we learned something even more intriguing... /2
When @Plundermot checked the source code behind the Daily Mail's inflammatory article, they found that the Mail themselves had deliberately disabled all the advertising. /3
Since then, #StopFundingHate supporters have been credited with bringing about significant changes - including a marked reduction in anti-migrant front pages in the UK press
Today's Daily Mail has devoted its front page to an inflammatory story targeting a charity, the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, which it says has "put critical race theory in its guidelines" &"wants courses including sciences & maths to teach about colonialism" /1
The Daily Mail then airs a series of extraordinary claims about the QAA, including a suggestion that the charity is enforcing "anti-white & anti-Western hatred & division" & wants to depict "every aspect of our past as evil and shameful". /2
The author of today's inflammatory Daily Mail story has previously claimed that "a THIRD of British universities are in a free speech crisis" ...in an article written for the Russian government's propaganda outlet RT 🤔 /3
Today's Daily Mail claims "freedom of speech and the academic rigour it supports have been dealt a catastrophic blow with the news that the Quality Assurance Agency... has incorporated ‘critical race theory’ into its recommendations to universities" archive.ph/Fe1hx
Today's Daily Mail article follows a wave of inflammatory media stories framing the discussion of equality issues as a threat to free speech.
Is this really a narrative that @AldiUK wants to support?
Why is that so many advertisers have chosen not to fund GB News? Is it because of a "sinister" plot against the channel by #StopFundingHate supporters, as suggested in this article? Or might there be additional reasons for big brands to steer clear? 1/ archive.ph/2022.10.28-132…
Just last week, GB News was called out by leading UK Jewish organisations over its repeated use of a term widely associated with antisemitism. Is it any surprise that responsible advertisers might not want to be aligned with this kind of rhetoric? /2 theguardian.com/politics/2022/…
Soon after GB News launched, one of its own contributors quit, accusing the channel of "demonising trans people at every opportunity". Many LGBT-inclusive companies will be mindful of the risks of supporting an outlet with this track record. /3