Greg Lawton Profile picture
Nov 24 7 tweets 3 min read
There appears to be some further misinformation circulating regarding “pharmacist shortages”. This “Locum Rates Study” was prepared for Employers by Locate a Locum.

workforce.locatealocum.com/hubfs/Pharmacy…

#pharmacy

1/
The document states:

“Another notable change in the pharmacist market is the movement of community pharmacists to Primary Care Networks. In May 2022, Pulse reported that 16,780 *pharmacists* had been hired with support from the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS).”

2/
This appears to be based on this Pulse article, which in fact reads:

“According to NHS Digital figures – which are based on data submitted by 84% of PCNs – 16,780 **staff** have been hired into ARRS roles and are working in general practice.”

pulsetoday.co.uk/news/pulse-pcn…

3/
In respect of the ARRS, “staff” includes all of these groups:

england.nhs.uk/gp/expanding-o…

4/ Image
I’m sure all those with integrity will be clamouring to correct the record after presenting inaccurate information.

5/
Excerpt from the document. If setting rates based on information in the document “can help you save money”, it sounds like it’s designed to achieve lower rates. Any competition law experts care to comment?

6/ Image
It’s a document providing an “analysis” and figures on locum pay rates. I understand that the NPA sent this out.

The NPA is a business partner to Locate a Locum.

npa.co.uk/businesspartne…

7/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Lawton

Greg Lawton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @thisislawton

Nov 23
RPS:
“The evidence from our 2021 Workforce Wellbeing survey shows that the pressures on the pharmacy workforce continues to negatively impact on mental health and wellbeing…”

1/

rpharms.com/recognition/al…
From the survey - the top factors for poor mental health and wellbeing:
70% - inadequate staffing
64% - long work hours and lack of work/life balance
53% - lack of protected learning time
52% - lack of colleague or senior support

2/ Image
In the context of the survey results, at its annual conference it ran a "morning breathing workshop" followed by a “mid-morning breathing workshop”.

events.rpharms.com/website/8675/w…

3/ ImageImage
Read 7 tweets
Nov 13
20,924 reported #pharmacy closures in a year. Most common reported reason: “locum could not be found”.
Was the locum hiding somewhere, in a bizarre game of hide and seek?
Or couldn’t they find a locum *willing to work in the conditions on offer*?
Did they try to find a locum?

1/
In no cases was the reported reason “it would have cost more for a locum in a free market than we wanted to pay” or “unable to find a pharmacist willing to work in the conditions in the pharmacy”. The reported reasons don’t tell the whole story.

2/
Based on the C&D article, there appear to be 5,665 closures for which no reason is listed. (20924-10637-2891-811-432-221-141-74-19-10-16-7= 5665). Did NHSE allow the pharmacy to close without requiring the owner to provide a reason?

3/
Read 11 tweets
Oct 6
RPS representation of pharmacy technicians would mean it couldn’t properly represent either pharmacists or pharmacy technicians.

1/
The change would pave the way for a pharmacist-only professional leadership body which doesn’t have the issue of trying to represent two distinct groups, whose interests will often conflict and compete.

2/
For those who haven’t considered it, the conflicts will include, for example, whether to employ a pharmacist or a pharmacy technician for a particular job or role; whether a particular activity or service should be reserved for or delivered by a particular group;

3/
Read 13 tweets
Oct 4
PSNC distances community pharmacy from the NHS

“…the NHS tactic of poaching community pharmacy staff to work in general practices is absurd and having very damaging consequences for community pharmacies."

1/
“Poaching” suggests it is done in a clandestine manner, ignoring the fact that staff will be actively applying and engaging with recruitment processes for other roles

2/
"locum pay increasing by 85 per cent since 2020."

News to all locums

3/
Read 5 tweets
Jul 25
New internal Lloydspharmacy documents reveal how it manages the GPhC, and how the GPhC allows itself to be managed.

Thread /🧵
The documents say that the GPhC will continue to “support pharmacy” (as opposed to regulating it?) and “seek assurances” about how the pharmacy *is continuing to meet* the standards (as opposed to determining impartially *whether or not* its standards have been met).

2/
The GPhC will take a “more proportionate” (codeword, in respect of regulation, for “lazier”; signifies deregulation and poorer public protection) approach by phoning some pharmacies instead of visiting them.

3/
Read 19 tweets
Jun 29
From the House of Lords Motion to Regret the Pharmacy (Responsible Pharmacists, Superintendent Pharmacists etc.) Order 2022 (28 June 2022)

1/

hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-06-… Image
One peer argued as per the image in this tweet.

The irony being that they’re discussing the outcome of a *consultation* in which the responses opposing the new regulatory powers were set aside, then saying don’t worry, any changes will be *consulted* on.

2/ Image
Of course, this has become a feature of politics - pretending not to see the irony, sort-of-hoping that others won’t, but not really caring if they do. Nevertheless, embarrassing for those who do it.

3/
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(