$pthrf
Thread on why being short $panr as the company enters an intense period of consequential news is going up against the clear balance of probabilities.
(a) The flow test results from Alkaid-2, #panr's first production well, are imminent. The flow test will not,...1/
...in itself, be a binary event for the $panr investment case (there are four other distinct reservoirs on #panr's acreage) but it is obvious the initial flow results from A2 will be treated in that manner by many in the market.
(b) Guidance from $pthrf management...2/
...states that a flow rate of 150bopd per 1000ft of lateral will support a declaration of commerciality for the Alkaid anomaly. Thus, 150 x 5.3 = 795bopd.
(c) The Alkaid anomaly was flow tested successfully in 2019 at Alkaid-1. A 6ft (yes, only 6ft) interval was...3/
$panr #panr
...perf'd and stimulated resulting in a flow rate of 108bopd. Management has subsequently described the properties of the reservoir at the A2 location to be superior to those found at A1.
(d) Founder of Great Bear and CTO of $panr, Bob Rosenthal, is on the record..4/ #panr $pthrf
...stating $panr has achieved sufficient data to surpass the threshold required to declare 100% geological Chance of Success. In late 2021, prior to the successful 21/22 winter season, Bob stated his assessment of the *commercial* CoS was "between 60 and 70%." 5/ #panr $pthrf
I note the evidence-less allegations of fraud recently levelled against the $panr BoD. For shorters who are just following the wolfpack, be aware Bob Rosenthal has been a main board advisor to BP and the #panr chairman was the Ops Director of Prudhoe Bay for ARCO. 6/
$pthrf
If you don't know where Prudhoe Bay is situated v's #panr's acreage or that it's the largest oilfield in US history then you deserve to get carted out on your trade for such ignorance, never mind objectively examining the CVs of the $panr BoD! 7/
$pthrf
(e) The short looks to be c.30-35m shares presently. Perhaps 11 days to cover on ADV? The thing is, which is so often missed by non-UK investors particularly, the UK AIM market (small caps) sees heavy involvement from market makers. Thus, what...8/ #panr $panr $pthrf
...appears to the unsophisticated eye to be 11 days to cover is more like 18+ days IMHO if you incorporate the "double counting" of market maker prints. This is exacerbated further by the US OTC quote $pthrf where the OTC line is *not* fully fungible...9/ #panr $panr
...and thus the OTC brokers rely on their UK counterparts for liquidity. So there may very well be instances of triple counting of the same stock going through the market. Shorters - you're going to have a helluva job closing out *if* the statistically probable...10/ #panr $panr
...proof of commercial flow is published next week/week after.
(f) It should be clear to most market participants that $panr's register is dominated largely by UK private investors. There are many historic reasons for this but one of them is the re-shaping of...11/
$pthrf #panr
...portfolios by UK small cap fund managers. ESG has clearly had an effect. The net result is that there are hardly any UK small cap funds which now invest in E&P stocks. However, there remains a cohort of UK fund managers who *do* invest in revenue-generating E&P...12/
$panr
...companies. I personally know of at least three who are waiting for the results from Alkaid-2 before re-assessing their investment decision. Two of them have explicitly asked me to phone them on the morning of a relevant RNS. Shorters are, of course, free...13/ #panr $panr
...to call my bluff. Ballsy call if you've read my verbose threads on $panr which focus on facts not fantasy!
(g) Back to the UK private investor shareholder base. I accept that some of the shorters will imagine they have caused such a sentiment shockwave amongst these..14/ #panr
...private UK investors recently that, on a successful flow test result from A2, they'll still be able to close their short from shell-shocked retail investors anxious to return to sleep-filled nights? IMHO that would be a foolish assumption, a very... 15/ #panr $panr $pthrf
...foolish and costly assumption. $panr has attracted many O&G experts and veterans of the sector, such as David Hobbs (@EnergyHobbs), a globally recognised expert. He has been joined by other geologists, petro-physicists, reservoir engineers, seismic specialists,...16/ #panr
...geophysicists, drillers....plus a range of markets, finance and legal professionals. This does *not* guarantee success but it *does* mean the risk/reward of the investment case is more deeply understood than most other listed E&Ps. To shorters - just think,...17/
$panr #panr
...if $panr's thesis is proven, in part by the A2 flow test data, this BoD whom some of your number label "fraudsters", will have found the second or third largest onshore conventional oilfield in US history. /18 #panr $pthrf
Many of the shorters have dismissed *without evidence* the integrity of the $panr BoD. They have elected to believe social media commentators who haven't even bothered to construct their own risked/unrisked models such is their superficial approach to "research". 19/ #panr
Shorters have also elected to dismiss on the record statements describing the farm in offer made to $panr this time last year...$1b staged investment for 30% of the project. The shorters' chins would collectively hit the ground with a resounding thump if they knew...20/ #panr
...the identities of the investors whose technical team approved the project having spent *months* in the data room.
These shorters would do well to consider whether they wish to be short "over the weekend"?! 21/
$panr $pthrf #panr
To everyone else following $panr, I have this to say. Since the co-ordinated bear raid began, I have read nothing, *repeat nothing*, from the shorters which was "new news". They have no edge to this trade, none whatsoever. If you have elected to believe in the integrity...22/
...of the $panr BoD then, without question IMHO, the balance of probabilities is in shareholders' favour v's the shorters. GLA. /end #panr $pthrf
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
$panr $pthrf #panr@Josh_Young_
Josh - please treat this email thread with the seriousness it demands. Bison Interests is a regulated entity. You have 12 hours from the time of this tweet to correct the record otherwise I will be filing a formal complaint with the SEC. 1/
This is not a threat. This is a guarantee.
On Sept 20th this year you tweeted the following: "Directors selling millions of shares of Pantheon Resources stock, and then being "awarded" the same amount of shares. Not a good look. Not involved, no recommendation. $panr" 2/
You then attached a document which appears to be an excerpt of the $panr RNS dated 20/9/22.
I replied to your original tweet informing you I had, in the course of my career in UK investment banking, carried out many of these types of transactions on behalf of UK listed..3/ #panr
$panr $pthrf #panr@CG_Driven
Pantheon Resources (PANR LN) – Stock down 16% - Muddy Waters short attack: Weekend press staying that Muddy Waters is in the process of a short attack on Pantheon. They have not published anything (that we can find) for the company to make any...1/
...specific push-backs on, so in the meantime, all we can do is reiterate our thesis.
=> Well-testing remains key: I revert back to our research note from Oct 26th.
=> Alkaid#2 update - encouragement and challenges: No details beyond that the well produced..2/
$panr #panr $pthrf
...at initial fluid rates "in the thousands of barrels per day" with around 10% average oil cut.
=> The operational issue: Frack sand production has been higher than expected with limited handling capacity in the temporary test facilities. More positively,..3/
$panr #panr $pthrf
@RieckKay @BurgghabenH @TwitterSupport
Dear Mr Rieck - I am sorry to inform you that @BurgghabenH has hired a private investigator in an attempt to doxx me. The private investigator and @BurgghabenH now appear to believe you are the account holder known as Scot126. 1/
@BurgghabenH has tweeted out a copy of your passport and photo and your address in the UAE. I am so sorry you have been caught up in this dreadful conduct. I don't know what's going on, what his motivation is, I just don't understand what's happening? There is a public...2/
...debate within investment circles in the UK and US about a London listed company called Pantheon Resources. Some hedge funds are alleging fraud. I disagree and have challenged them to present supporting evidence. But look at the lengths they're going to now. 3/
$panr #panr#panr
There is no "gotcha" question remaining outstanding. After 12 years, $300m invested in Alaska, 6 wells and the award of two Production Units from the Dept of Natural Resources the core "known unknown" is lateral continuity.
Only Hempton thinks there's...1/
..."no oil". Everyone else from Peel Hunt to Baker Hughes to eSeis acknowledges the Oil in Place is >23 billion barrels. The key debate prior to obtaining the empirical data is whether commercial flow can be achieved from $panr's stacked reservoirs of light 35-40 API...2/ #panr
...crude oil. I assess that the *fact* "thousands of barrels" of fluid was returned to the surface during the initial clean up phase gives a strong indication the reservoir has, after a multi-stage frack to stimulate, the properties to allow commercial extraction. 3/
$panr #panr
...of Alaska Dept of Natural Resources. Something about the implied valuation of $panr's total acreage being c.$6m v's a mkt cap of c.$700m? Apart from the *fact* #panr is the *only* party which possesses 3D seismic data over that area (Great Bear invested c.$80m on shooting...2/
...seismic in the 2010s), I calculate the new northern extension to Theta West will see $panr's OIP move towards a gigantic 30bbo. Yes, that's correct. OIP approaching 30bbo, making it a larger accumulation of oil than Kuparuk River. I presume you're aware..3/ #panr $pthrf
@David37655174@chmok@contrarian8888 Yes, I have. I'd firstly refer you to the Canaccord and WH Ireland analysts' risked/unrisked models. Canaccord has a risked NPV of 300p and WH Ireland is c.180p (from memory?). Unrisked NPVs get you to 800p-1400p per share. 1/
$panr $pthrf #panr
@David37655174@chmok@contrarian8888 The question you pose illustrates exactly the dilemma which $panr presents to the market. Using the traditional risked/unrisked E&P valuation methodology, the sheer scale of $panr's OIP and Technically Recoverable Resource means that even if a low risk of success..2/ #panr $pthrf
@David37655174@chmok@contrarian8888 ...is attached to the project's potential value, a number is delivered which is at least double that of the current SP. Removing the risked calculation altogether leads to telephone numbers of NPV.
In the scenario where Alkaid-2 delivers a commercial flow, I contend...3/
$panr