Jeff Giesea Profile picture
Nov 25 14 tweets 3 min read
I want @elonmusk to succeed, but I believe his erratic, monarchic approach to Trust & Safety issues going to backfire. A quick 🧵
I’ll admit, it is satisfying to watch Twitter’s “regime change” for those of us acquainted with the company’s longstanding political bias. But he needs to move Twitter to sanity for his deal to succeed, not from one form of crazy to another.
This means taking a more professional, conciliatory approach. And yes, making compromises. These compromises might seem weak in the short term but will advance an equilibrium of free speech, political neutrality, positive user experience, and profitability in the long run.
Specifically, he needs to hand off these issues to a Yoel Roth-type figure and quickly build a new team & process for Trust & Safety with an emphasis on foreign influence in particular. His current approach of polling, off-the-cuff decisions, and mass amnesty is foolhardy.
Here is what will happen if he doesn’t take a professional approach.

Note: I am not saying I want these things to happen. This is the way I predict the establishment swarm will react to his continued approach and how it will impact the business (see @johnrobb’s work)
First, more advertisers will drop Twitter. Current brand advertisers will move from a “wait and see mode” to a hard no. Ad agencies will blackball the company. This will cripple Twitter ad revenue potential, which has huge upside potential.
Second, app stores will face pressure drop or suppress Twitter, which will make it more difficult for new users to discover and sign up. This will impact Twitter’s distribution and overall growth potential.
Third, payment processors will come under pressure to drop Twitter. (Again, I don’t want this or think this is fair, it’s just reality). This will cripple efforts to drive recurring subscription revenue, which is where Musk sees the most possibility for value creation.
Fourth, the technical infrastructure companies Twitter relies on will come under pressure to drop the company (as they have for other platforms like Gab as I understand it). These issues can be overcome, but it’s just another headache.
Fifth, politicians and political agitators will come after Twitter in new ways. I would expect to see a lot of (predatory) lawfare directed at the company, for example. They’ll come up with endless red tape issues and headaches to make things more difficult.
Many people say “Twitter is a private company, it can do what it wants.” This is true in theory but not the way the world works. Twitter is a global public square. It impacts politics in many countries. It is a geopolitical battle space. It is too important to be left alone.
So @elonmusk faces a decision: continue with his current approach, challenge the system, and face pain and predation. Or take a more conciliatory and professional approach that involves compromises but that may advance his goals more longer term. I advocate the latter.
It will be an uphill battle either way, but the conciliatory approach will work better in my view. Better to be “wholesale sane, retail mad” rather than “wholesale mad, retail sane.”
Ok back to dad-ing at the playground. I hope you all had a wonderful #Thanksgiving

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Giesea

Jeff Giesea Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jeffgiesea

Oct 27
I'm cautiously optimistic about Elon taking over Twitter. Swinging too far toward free speech absolutism would be a mistake, but I don't think he'll do that. You can already see a change in tone in his message to advertisers. Curious how this plays out.
As @elonmusk buys Twitter, I would anticipate:

•One or two big moves, like letting Trump back on the platform by a certain date

•Significant internal personnel & culture changes

•Marginal product improvement - the user experience won't change as much as people expect
One of Twitter's most challenging product decisions will be whether to force users to authenticate their ID on signup. I don't think Musk will force this (or should), but he could introduce a badging mechanism for authenticated users.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 22
Listening to the #WeCanDoHardThings (yes I listen lol) with ⁦@pronounced_ing. Noticing the impact of the host ⁦@GlennonDoyle⁩ using terms like “white fragility” & “patriarchy,” whereas Ng describes the same issues w/ more nuance & humanity. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/we-…
I’m not allergic to discussing these issues, but I find some people’s reliance on these terms reductive, bigoted, and a bit lazy, as if reaching for the proximate woke scapegoat (patriarchy = men bad; white fragility = white people bad). The terms feel dated and inadequate.
If we wanted to play the same game, we could point to Doyle as representative of the way liberal white women evangelize and fetishize the woke lexicon to the chagrin of everyone. A bit like Elena in Little Fires Everywhere, no? We would need a name for this :)
Read 5 tweets
Oct 9
The common thread: Three men whose neurodivergence is part of their brilliance and also their greatest liability, leaving a trail of achievement and disaster in their wake. An under-discussed issue.
Many of us have friends and family like this: Brilliant sufferers who need behavioral guardrails in the worst way, surrounded by enablers. The only solution is loving decoupling and firm boundaries.
Celebrity + mental illness in a globalized info environment is... complicated.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 19
Been thinking through a new approach to sustainability and climate issues driven by six principles.

Just playing around - let me know what you think...
Vision:

Resource abundance as global population surpasses 11b by 2100.

Ensure grandchildren's generation has access to clean air, water, food, energy.

Help developing nations pursue prosperity unconstrained by resource limitations.
Six principles for a different approach to sustainability:

· Abundance over scarcity mindset
· Results over virtue signaling
· Innovation over activism
· Capitalism & growth over socialism & stagnation
· Human life over abstract principles
· Technology over tree-planting
Read 6 tweets
Sep 12
I agree about the rot on the Right. But here’s the thing: It presents a once-in-a-generation leadership opportunity to get the party back to a healthy place. This requires moving thoroughly & decisively post-trump and -trumpism.
As it stands, we are well down the path toward a one-party system. And maybe for good reason. But this isn’t healthy or sustainable either. The desired end state should be a healthy two-party system. It is to *disagree* constructively about how to serve American citizens.
The left’s approach of conflating genuine threats to democracy with partisan interests is very dangerous in itself. But this is harder to call out when the GOP is still in the throes of Trump & Trumpism.

Take a look at the study referenced in this @jawillick piece.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 9
The problem with the sustainability movement is that it is based on a premise of scarcity instead of a dedication to abundance. It is driven by top-down policy instead of bottom-up innovation. Here's the result: wsj.com/articles/the-c…
A different approach would frame things around creating a resources-rich planet as we grow to 10 billion people. It would be much more technology-focused, and much more mindful of secondary effects. Fossil fuels are not the enemy, but a friend to help make the transition.
Today's intersection of energy geopolitics, climate/water issues, and carbon-neutral technology should open the door to new thinking on these topics, I would think. And hopefully engage more people's creativity and intellect.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(