nature.com/articles/s4200…\\
A rather remarkable study. The authors propose that infection by the apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma changes the behavior of wolves and makes them greater risk-takers, thereby increasing their tendency to break off and found their own packs or become
leaders of packs. They propose that this behavior brings them in contact with pumas that the wolves normally avoid and results in increased propensity for them being infected by the parasite on one hand and increased propensity to transmit them to the cat, which is the definitive
host (where the parasite completes its sexual cycle), on the other. Thus, the parasite manipulates the behavior of the wolf, in a sense it even imparts the host with a possible positive effect on fitness, to further its own transmission. This parallels the house cat-rodent cycle
of Toxoplasma, wherein the parasite changes the neurotransmitter concentrations in the mice and rat brains to make them go towards cats. Here, it reduces the fitness of the rodent rather unequivocally while increasing its probability of transmission to the definitive host. In
domestic dogs, Toxoplasma can be sexually transmitted by males; hence, it might also similarly be transmitted within a wolf pack via sex. Toxoplasma might also make male rats more sexually active by increasing testosterone production and similarly enhance its own transmission via
the sexual mode. While humans might be in part a dead end host for it, there is some evidence it might alter the sexual behavior and aggression in both males and females -- be vary of having a cat as a pet. However, in our close cousin, the chimpanzee, Toxoplasmosis causes a
morbid attraction towards leopard urine, thus, increasing their chances of being killed and eaten by one. In a different strategy, the related parasite Sarcocystis infects the heart muscles of hare and deer and makes them slower. Thus, they are eaten by dholes and is transmitted
to them. In turn a subset of the dhole pack might carry higher levels of the parasite and play a role in transmitting Sarcocystis to herbivores via their latrines -- again a potential fitness gain (probably via kin) to the pack.
nature.com/articles/s4146…
Another study which shows that hyena cubs infected by Toxoplasma tend to lose their fear of lions and approach them more closely than uninfected one. Thus, they tend to be killed more often by the cats and transmit the parasite to their definitive host.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To clarify, I don't think any of the evidence supports that. The history of pR^ithvirAja is shrouded in agenda-driven myth making. The Mohd. authors obviously wanted to illustrate the triumph of the army of Islam against the H & slant their narratives thus. The nirgrantha-s while
acknowledging that chAhamAna rule was a golden age for them, are still ill-disposed toward the sanAtana-dharma that the kings followed. Hence, they tend to present the king in a negative light -- i.e., blame his defeat on being slothful or given to excessive love for this woman
The white indologists, given their expected biases, have gone with the Mohd. & vivAsa chroniclers, while trying to claim that H accounts were myth-making. They have tried to argue that 1. pR^ithivirAja was not an important ruler; 2. He probably never ruled over dilli; 3.He was as
The physician/chronicler of the Rashid ad-Din records a curious Mongol exploratory expedition to Siberia commissioned by Sorghaghtani Beki the wife of Chingiz Khan's youngest son Tolui. She is said to have assembled 1000 men under 3 of her commanders to sail north on the Angara
river. They discovered a province near a ``sea of silver'' and are said to have obtained so much of the metal that it could fit in their vessels. Lower down on the Angara, near what is today the Bratsk reservoir, silver pitchers associated with the Ashina clan of the Blue Turks
were recovered in the last century. This suggests that there might have been knowledge of a silver deposit in the Angara region among the Turko-Mongol peoples of Mongolia.
The pichChilonmAda of the American intellectual Sam Harris is not entirely unusual -- it just that he honestly expresses his thoughts in words unlike many others, whose behaviors suggest that they hold ideas very close to him. This did not begin with vijaya-nAma-vyApArin becoming
the mahAmlechCharAT. The recent Euro-American academe has bred a certain common type among those of European/Euro-West Asian ancestry that loves to conform. We psychoanalyze this as primarily stemming from their non-reversal to a natural religion after their faith in a West Asian
counter-religion weakened. Thus, they need things to believe in & feel part of a tradition larger than themselves. navyonmAda satisfies that but there is also an urge to feel heroic in the fight against the shaitan -- probably stemming from the vAsana-s of the counter-religions.
The daftar of the Mogol tyrants of India has its roots in koko debter (the blue register) which was initiated by Shigi Qutuku the foster son of Chingiz Khan at his behest.
The koko debter was first initiated in 1206 CE & included a census of the subjects of the Mongol Khaghanate. At 1st, the census only included the steppe peoples. In the time of Mongke Khan it was extended to the chIna, the rUs, and Mohd subjects. In 1235 CE S.Qutuku& Yelü Chucai
carried out a massive census of the chIna-s for the debter. One of biggest pre-modern census efforts was that of Mongke in 1252 CE spanning much of their empire. It covered chIna, rUs, Iran and the Caucasus in addition to the core steppe lands.
In the late 1980s-early 90s there was a brief DD TV show featuring them. The more widely name applied to them was "Brokpa" & the usual canard was spread that they were remnants of the Macedonian of Alex. Visually they seemed quite IA than East Asia.
Another notable feature with regard to this tribe is their origin myth which has an interesting parallel to that of the Ossetian Iranics who descend from the Arani/Alani. There are tripartite founders matching the v2-v1-v3 archetypes in that order. This is clearly an old Aryan
This reflects an ancient intuitive knowledge of the inference of possible kinship via odorific similarity. In humans, such odors could emerge from subtle signals of breakdown products of the polymorphic MHC proteins otherwise involved in antigen presentation to T-cells. There is
modern empirical support for this in mate choice (anti- sagandha) & nest mates among females. The role of the major urinary proteins can also not be ruled out, though they are less understood in humans. It is also notable that some olfactory receptor polymorphism is correlated
with political orientation. The sensing of the steroid androstenone might also be cue that could be sensed via olfaction that conditions political orientation. Thus, political orientation could be a remnant of old "sagandha" seeking in difficult conflict situations