Post

More from @WomensRightsNet

Women's Rights Network - WRN

@WomensRightsNet

Nov 12

Why are women so angry about football? Some men have been musing on this ‘dressing room stuff’ @campbellclaret and are baffled. Here’s our handy primer for those at the back of the room who haven’t been paying attention @GaryLineker

We’ll start with the 17-year-old girl hauled in front of the @FA Serious Case Panel for asking the very reasonable question ‘are you a man’ when a bearded bloke walked on to the pitch to play in a female match.

Beardy man reported the matter to a charity @kickitout who then went squealing to the FA who, in turn, launched a full-on disciplinary and imposed a six-match ban on the weeping teenager. Safeguarding Fail 🚩
x.com/WomensRightsNe…

Then there’s the Sheffield and Hallamshire Women’s League… remember the young woman whose leg was broken after a tackle from a male on the opposing team? The season-ending injury led to a boycott by some of the teams, rightly concerned about the dangers.

The only reason any male feels entitled to play in female football is because @FA rules allow them to self-identify into the female game. When WRN met the FA back in May 24 to discuss their misogynistic policy they told us that 72 males were playing in the female game already – but it was okay because it was hardly a dent on the 2.6 million women and girls who play football. We say how many would be too many? 720? 7200? We say one male is too many. The FA is failing women.
x.com/WomensRightsNe…

Read 8 tweets

Women's Rights Network - WRN

@WomensRightsNet

Oct 4

This Saturday morning, WRN members will be joining the thousands of people heading to their local park to celebrate the 20th anniversary of @parkrunUK with a 5k run or walk. We’ll be there to highlight parkrun’s discriminatory policies towards women and girls, which allow males to self-identify into the female category. Why the campaign? 🧵

Until 2019 parkrun categorized runners by sex: male and female. Then, the categories changed to ‘gender’: Male, Female, Another Gender Identity, or Prefer Not To Say. Males started to self-identify into the female category. As men run, on average, 10-15% faster than women, a male identifying into the female category may set course times that can never be achieved by a woman. This is unfair.

On 210 occasions at parkrun women have been denied the accolade of first female finisher because a man has self-identified into the female category. Men hold more than 20 women’s overall and age category records. Every week participants receive the list of times set by the runners at their parkrun. If there is a male in the female category at your parkrun you will know about it.

Read 5 tweets

Women's Rights Network - WRN

@WomensRightsNet

Sep 25

WRN fully support this campaign. We've known for a long time that upskirting, voyeurism & indecent exposure are indicative of a pattern of criminal behaviour that leads to more serious crimes. The Pelicot case in France is just one horrifying example. 🧵/1
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…

However it is hard to reconcile this with current police policy that tells female officers that any man who identifies as a woman, non-binary or gender fluid can use their facilities. If he exposes himself on the streets it's a crime but in a changing room it's all fine. It is also incorrect as the Eq Act does allow you to refuse males in female facilities. 🧵/2

These nurses in Darlington fell foul of the same issue. The male nurse wasn't arrested for indecent exposure, instead his female colleagues were told they would be 're-educated.' Indecent exposure in public is frightening, when you are more vulnerable because in a state of undress, it is even more so. 🧵/3
news.sky.com/story/nurses-s…

Read 11 tweets

Women's Rights Network - WRN

@WomensRightsNet

Sep 16

After a long campaign against the so-called ‘Gender Quotas Bill’ in Wales, we are delighted that @WelshGovernment have finally now decided to scrap it.

This Bill was always an unlawful attempt to lever in self ID in Wales, a direct threat to the rights of women and girls, and would have inevitably ended up in the Supreme Court.

1/

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

WRN and @WRNWales have been at the forefront of the campaign against the Bill.
An early version was leaked, exposing the intent to allow men to self ID without challenge.
And WRN gave evidence at the Senedd this year, after submitting our consultation response.
We are pleased the new @PrifWeinidog has listened - her predecessors have not.
2/

Our thanks to all the women who stood up for their rights, wrote letters, and who attended the Senedd hearing.

We hope that @WelshGovernment now listen to these tenacious women and engage fully with them in future.

3/3

Read 4 tweets

Women's Rights Network - WRN

@WomensRightsNet

Sep 10

The @HMICFRS report into activism and impartiality in policing is out.

Its key findings are that the police are CONFUSED about the law and are NOT impartial because they DON'T UNDERSTAND what operational independence looks like.

1/8

hmicfrs.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/publication-ht…

This flies in the face of the Government's assertion that they do not intend clarifying the Equality Act.

The HMICFRS report clearly states that clarification is needed. The Police recognise this. Why doesn’t the Government? @AnnelieseDodds
2/8
telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/…

This confusion (along with a hefty dollop of indoctrination) has led the NPCC to approve the transgender search guidance that allows males to strip search women and girls.

This guidance is unlawful and is a clear example of the police going beyond the law.

3/8
womensrights.network/wrn-police-rep…

Read 9 tweets

Women's Rights Network - WRN

@WomensRightsNet

Sep 9

We WANT to believe that the @metpoliceuk are listening to women.
We WANT to believe that they are serious about policing impartially.
But reality tells a different story.
We would like to update you now about the below response we received about extreme trans activism within the Metropolitan Police.
1/7

Rewind to 21 July last year, when we released this short clip to illustrate our concerns about a ‘Trans Day of Visibility’ event that had been held by a member of Metropolitan police staff.

Officers and staff had been invited to attend.
We know there were at least 50 in the room and many more listening remotely. Speaking during this session were various activists. The messages given to officers and staff were disturbing.
2/7
)

https://x.com/womensrightsnet/status/1682337544799678469?s=46&t=v-c-_XT3Lv6Ow-vgwIBPeA

We wrote to Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner.
Serving officers and staff should NOT be told that they are ‘bigots’ and ‘motivated by hate’ if they do not agree with trans ideology.
Officers should NOT be told to protest, lobby and to ‘get out onto the streets’.
It is staggering that the report by Baroness Casey was being disparaged.
It is shocking that officers and staff would think it appropriate or professional to boo and hiss at the mention of a prominent women’s rights campaigner.
Yet all this happened on their premises. And they see nothing wrong with that.

3/7

Read 8 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Women's Rights Network - WRN

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @WomensRightsNet

Women's Rights Network - WRN

Women's Rights Network - WRN

Women's Rights Network - WRN

Women's Rights Network - WRN

Women's Rights Network - WRN

Women's Rights Network - WRN

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!