Nicholas Drummond Profile picture
Nov 26, 2022 17 tweets 7 min read Read on X
The Netflix remake of “All Quiet on the Western Front” is every bit as powerful as the original film. Whenever a significant new war film comes out, I like to see how it stacks-up against the all time greats. So here’s a thread on 12 war movies you must watch.
First, the criteria for inclusion:
- The story, script and acting must hang together as a piece of theatre
- It must have an element of hope, or message, even when depicting the horrors of war
- It must entertain
- It must build on the body of work already in existence.
By the above measures, you won’t find recent films like 1917 or Dunkirk. Neither adds anything new. Both are a triumph of visual style over cinematic storytelling. They try to be immersive fairground rides, so as impressive as they are, they are not classics. Here we go.
At No. 12 is “Waterloo” from 1970 with Rod Steiger as Napoleon and Christopher Plummer as Wellington. Directed by Sergei Bondarchuk, the movie makes the list for the sheer spectacle it provides. Made in the days before CGI with ‘000s of extras, its battle scenes are epic.
At No. 11 is Ridley Scott’s “Gladiator” with Russell Crowe leading a stellar cast that included Joaquin Phoenix. The beginning battle scene is exhilarating as any you’ll see. What sets it apart is the pace and build-up. “Are you not entertained?” says Crow. Yes, indeed we are.
At No. 10 is “Blackhawk Down,” another Ridley Scott masterpiece. Ewan McGregor and Eric Bana provide contrasting performances as the amateur and professional thrown into the same fight. The only modern era film to make the list, it well conveys a sense of fear and uncertainty.
At No. 9 is Stanley Kubrick’s nuclear war satire “Dr. Strangelove” with the immortal Peter Sellars in the title role, ably supported by George C. Scott. Sellars also plays two other roles. Few films manage to be hilarious and terrifying at the same time. A work of genius.
At No. 8 is “The Battle of Britain.” While it boasts a star-studded cast, it is the aerial dog fight sequences that make this film memorable. Historically accurate, it does a spectacular job of describing how close it was. Still eminently watchable despite being made in 1969.
At No. 7 is “Bridge on River Kwai.” Starring Alec Guinness in the role that established him as one of the great British actors, this Oscar-winning film is about conflicting ideologies that while seeming to clash are in fact similar. William Holden and Jack Hawkins add depth.
At No.6 is another David Lean classic, “Lawrence of Arabia.” This too stands the test of time in terms of the story, acting and action. Visually rich, the scene where Omar Sharif’s character encounters Peter O’Toole as Lawrence remains iconic. Worth every one of its 7 Oscars.
At No. 5 is “Where Eagles Dare.” Starring Richard Burton and Clint Eastwood, this is a classic war movie of the old school, but the first one to eschew the everlasting machine gun magazine. Pure entertainment from start to finish. Can you spot the one glaring historical error?
At No. 4 is “The Cruel Sea” stars Jack Hawkins as the Captain of a Flower Class corvette responsible for escorting Atlantic convoys. This is a film that is brilliant on so many levels. Despite being made in 1953, it retains emotion and power. Cinematic brilliance.
At Number 3 is “Das Boot.” A German film providing an opposite view of the Battle of the Atlantic, it is no less powerful or inspiring for not being British. The film set a new standard for grittiness and realism that redefined the genre. A masterpiece. (Best watched in German
At No. 2 is Steven Spielberg’s “Saving Private Ryan.” It set new standards for immersive realism, but at the same time told a brilliant story through an extraordinary bunch of actors including Tom Hanks and Matt Damon. Who can forget the Normandy beach scene?
Which brings us to No. 1, and takes us back to the beginning of this thread, as it has to be the original “All Quiet on the Western Front” released in 1930. A superb cast, expertly directed, and achieving extraordinary realism, this is visual storytelling at its very best.
To round off the thread, a few honourable mentions: “The Deer Hunter,” “Apocalypse Now” and “Full Metal Jacket” - all Vietnam films, are excellent, but don’t quite make the cut. “Zulu,” “Rome - Open City,” and “The Great Escape” are also close, but no cigar.
But what else should have been included and why? And has any contemporary war movie come close to the classics that appeared shortly after WW1 and WW2? I don’t think so. But maybe I have missed something?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicholas Drummond

Nicholas Drummond Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nicholadrummond

Nov 23
It was right to retire the British Army's Thales Watchkeeper WK450 UAS. It took far too long to bring it into service and by the time it arrived, newer and better systems were available. It was also difficult to operate. The question is what do we replace it with? (1/6) Image
An obvious choice is General Atomics Mojave, which is optimised for STOL operations from austere locations. This has a larger payload, double the range and better ISR sensors. It can also carry up to 16 Hellfire missiles for strike tasks. Crucially, it is harder to jam. (2/6) Image
Mojave, which is a modified version of General Atomics' MQ-1C Gray Eagle UAS, weighs 1½ tonnes and has a reinforced undercarriage. Technically, it compares well to Watchkeeper while also being considerably less expensive to purchase and operate. (3/6) Image
Read 6 tweets
Jun 11, 2023
The @GD_LandSystems M10 Booker is not a derivative of the ASCOD platform, but an all-new design. The hull has well-sloped armour, an 800 hp diesel driveline and @Horstman_Group hydro-pneumatic struts. The 105 mm gun based on the UK ROF L7 and is mounted in an Abrams-based turret. Image
As impressive as the vehicle itself is the acquisition approach. 12 prototypes from two companies were down-selected. These were tested extensively. A winner was chosen and awarded a LRIP contract for 26. Now that all issues are resolved a full production contract can be issued.
At each stage of the process, risk was managed. The onus was on @GD_LandSystems to resolve any issues in order to move the program to the next stage. Brigadier Glenn Dean, who has assumed overall responsibility for MPF deserves credit for doing a fantastic job.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 4, 2023
Over the last 15 months, @LockheedMartin's M270 & HIMARS rocket launchers have performed extremely well, obliterating Russian targets while reducing collateral damage at ranges of 70 km, which is beyond the enemy's capacity to return effective counter-battery fire. ImageImage
Ukraine's success with HIMARS confirms what we already believed, that precision-guided deep fires rockets and missiles enable smaller armies to deliver an effect that belies their size relative to larger, less capable adversaries. Image
Before the Russo-Ukrainian War, the USA had already initiated an upgrade programme to increase GMLRS range from 70 km to 150 km, while the new Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) can hit targets at 499 km, versus the existing ATACMS with a 150 km range. This is a significant upgrade. Image
Read 10 tweets
May 27, 2023
The British Army's Protected Mobility Pipeline (PMP) programme will see 14 platforms merged into 5. Three PM platforms (light, medium, & heavy) will replace Foxhound, Mastiff, Ridgeback, Wolfhound, Husky, Foxhound, and Panther. This will streamline through-life support. Image
As good as Boxer is, only 4 infantry battalions will be equipped with it. So having a larger fleet of lower cost PMVs will be essential. Also, the way in which they're being used in Ukraine, as battlefield taxis that move infantry out-of-contact, points to a new way of operating. Image
For some roles, it makes sense to purchase an off-the-shelf solution from abroad (e.g., Oshkosh JLTV) where the price is lower than domestically produced vehicles can match. But for others, British industry is perfectly capable of producing a state-of-the-art 4x4 or 6x6 PMV. Image
Read 6 tweets
May 16, 2023
When it comes to properly regenerating NATO forces, a prevailing view is that the Russo-Ukrainian conflict will be long over before any new capabilities ordered today are delivered, so any uplift in defence spending is pointless. THIS VIEW IS TOTALLY WRONG. Here's why... Image
While the conflict has resulted in the comprehensive degradation of Russia’s land force capabilities, Russia is not yet a spent force. Vladimir Putin has not accepted defeat, nor has he relinquished his territorial ambitions. Image
Even if the conflict is resolved in the short-term, either through the voluntary withdrawal or forced eviction of Russian forces from Ukraine, Putin is likely to use any peace agreement as an opportunity regenerate his army. Image
Read 7 tweets
May 14, 2023
I've been analysing the British Army's overall structure in anticipation of the Defence Command Paper Refresh. It'll be interesting to see how it will be reorganised to accommodate the headcount reduction from 77,000 to 72,500.
Since many units are already operating below their permitted headcount, or are reliant on the Army Reserve to deploy, we could see much leaner units across the Army. Will 450 person infantry battalions be fit for purpose?
I am sure those responsible for reconfiguring he Army will be trying all kinds of models to make the new structure work. But I fear a bold correction may be necessary to ensure the combat units we do intend to field have sufficient potency and resilience in terms of headcount.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(