The Netflix remake of “All Quiet on the Western Front” is every bit as powerful as the original film. Whenever a significant new war film comes out, I like to see how it stacks-up against the all time greats. So here’s a thread on 12 war movies you must watch.
First, the criteria for inclusion:
- The story, script and acting must hang together as a piece of theatre
- It must have an element of hope, or message, even when depicting the horrors of war
- It must entertain
- It must build on the body of work already in existence.
By the above measures, you won’t find recent films like 1917 or Dunkirk. Neither adds anything new. Both are a triumph of visual style over cinematic storytelling. They try to be immersive fairground rides, so as impressive as they are, they are not classics. Here we go.
At No. 12 is “Waterloo” from 1970 with Rod Steiger as Napoleon and Christopher Plummer as Wellington. Directed by Sergei Bondarchuk, the movie makes the list for the sheer spectacle it provides. Made in the days before CGI with ‘000s of extras, its battle scenes are epic.
At No. 11 is Ridley Scott’s “Gladiator” with Russell Crowe leading a stellar cast that included Joaquin Phoenix. The beginning battle scene is exhilarating as any you’ll see. What sets it apart is the pace and build-up. “Are you not entertained?” says Crow. Yes, indeed we are.
At No. 10 is “Blackhawk Down,” another Ridley Scott masterpiece. Ewan McGregor and Eric Bana provide contrasting performances as the amateur and professional thrown into the same fight. The only modern era film to make the list, it well conveys a sense of fear and uncertainty.
At No. 9 is Stanley Kubrick’s nuclear war satire “Dr. Strangelove” with the immortal Peter Sellars in the title role, ably supported by George C. Scott. Sellars also plays two other roles. Few films manage to be hilarious and terrifying at the same time. A work of genius.
At No. 8 is “The Battle of Britain.” While it boasts a star-studded cast, it is the aerial dog fight sequences that make this film memorable. Historically accurate, it does a spectacular job of describing how close it was. Still eminently watchable despite being made in 1969.
At No. 7 is “Bridge on River Kwai.” Starring Alec Guinness in the role that established him as one of the great British actors, this Oscar-winning film is about conflicting ideologies that while seeming to clash are in fact similar. William Holden and Jack Hawkins add depth.
At No.6 is another David Lean classic, “Lawrence of Arabia.” This too stands the test of time in terms of the story, acting and action. Visually rich, the scene where Omar Sharif’s character encounters Peter O’Toole as Lawrence remains iconic. Worth every one of its 7 Oscars.
At No. 5 is “Where Eagles Dare.” Starring Richard Burton and Clint Eastwood, this is a classic war movie of the old school, but the first one to eschew the everlasting machine gun magazine. Pure entertainment from start to finish. Can you spot the one glaring historical error?
At No. 4 is “The Cruel Sea” stars Jack Hawkins as the Captain of a Flower Class corvette responsible for escorting Atlantic convoys. This is a film that is brilliant on so many levels. Despite being made in 1953, it retains emotion and power. Cinematic brilliance.
At Number 3 is “Das Boot.” A German film providing an opposite view of the Battle of the Atlantic, it is no less powerful or inspiring for not being British. The film set a new standard for grittiness and realism that redefined the genre. A masterpiece. (Best watched in German
At No. 2 is Steven Spielberg’s “Saving Private Ryan.” It set new standards for immersive realism, but at the same time told a brilliant story through an extraordinary bunch of actors including Tom Hanks and Matt Damon. Who can forget the Normandy beach scene?
Which brings us to No. 1, and takes us back to the beginning of this thread, as it has to be the original “All Quiet on the Western Front” released in 1930. A superb cast, expertly directed, and achieving extraordinary realism, this is visual storytelling at its very best.
To round off the thread, a few honourable mentions: “The Deer Hunter,” “Apocalypse Now” and “Full Metal Jacket” - all Vietnam films, are excellent, but don’t quite make the cut. “Zulu,” “Rome - Open City,” and “The Great Escape” are also close, but no cigar.
But what else should have been included and why? And has any contemporary war movie come close to the classics that appeared shortly after WW1 and WW2? I don’t think so. But maybe I have missed something?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicholas Drummond

Nicholas Drummond Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nicholadrummond

Nov 4
The ethics of robotic weaponry is becoming a major concern as science fiction becomes science fact. So what are the military and ethical issues that will impact their usage? A thread.
1/
AI is already embedded into a variety of everyday systems and vehicles. The autopilot of modern airliners is a good example. Most landings are completely automated with the onboard computer taking all of the decisions. Cars are going the same way.
2/
We have AI on our smart phones it follows our interests and habits and recommends relevant content. So we should get used to machines acting independently of human input. It’s a thing and has been so for more than a decade.
3/
Read 17 tweets
Nov 3
A nice comment from yesterday’s Defence Committee session with @BWallaceMP was when Mark Francois quoted Dr. Julian Lewis, the previous head of the Committee, who said: “We need to spend three to be free.” Referring to the need to spend 3% of GDP on defence.
Just to expand on the point Mr. Wallace made. UK Boxers come have a GVW of 38.5 tonnes with an RS4 12.7 mm weapon station. If you added a manned turret it will weigh around 5-6 tonnes. So that weight has to be reduced elsewhere. Usually it’s Armour that comes off.
1 of 2
Far better to have an unmanned turret. These weigh 2-4 tonnes. They separate ammo storage from the crew compartment. They do not reduce interior space. And less armour comes off. The Lithuanian turret was a Rafael Samson. It had teething issues but these are now sorted.
2 of 3
Read 4 tweets
Oct 31
In the absence of fresh information, I’ve been trying to analyse what’s going on in Ukraine. The top line consensus is that both sides have stalled, with Ukraine making marginal gains and Russia pouring-in untrained and unwilling conscripts merely to hold the line.
1 of 6
Incremental casualties continue to mount-up on both sides. As winter approaches, cold weather and wet ground will restrict movement and combat. A lack of warm clothing and sustainment is likely to lead to unnecessary further Russian casualties and a collapse in morale.
2 of 6
Russia has ramped-up its activities by targeting infrastructure using Iranian loitering munitions, but these have had limited effect. The suffering imposed on ordinary Ukrainians has only strengthened their resolve. Putin has weaponised food by restricting grain exports.
3 of 6
Read 6 tweets
Oct 4
1⃣ As Putin's conventional weapons and military resources are depleted faster than he can regenerate them, it is looking improbable that he will achieve his military objectives in Ukraine. He therefore has two options. Escalate or withdraw.
2⃣ If Putin withdraws, his position as Russia's President becomes weaker, if not untenable. But, what if he escalates? It may be the only path to success. The decision to use nuclear weapons will depend on how he believes NATO would respond.
3⃣ Putin may think that any escalation on his behalf would trigger a corresponding response from NATO. But he may also think that non-Article 5 action by NATO could potentially fracture the coalition due to countries not directly at risk refusing to support it.
Read 10 tweets
Oct 3
The shocking lack of equipment issued to Russian conscripts is an important reminder that military equipment needs to be simple and effective. Every item issued must be 100% fit for purpose. The most important items are as follows.
1. Boots. After years of dodgy footwear, the British Army is one of only a handful that issues decent boots. Many types are offered, like these AKUs, and they're available in a wide range of sizes. Wet feet is a one way ticket to being combat ineffective.
2. Clothing. Next up is basic clothing. hard wearing combat jackets and trousers, plus inner layers suitable for each season are fundamental to functioning in the field. A breathable waterproof top layer that keeps a soldier dry, keeps a soldier fighting.
Read 11 tweets
Aug 24
6.8x48 mm Creedmoor ammunition uses the same basic case as 7.62x51 mm NATO, but shoots faster, flatter and further while weighing less and having lower recoil. It can replace 7.62 mm in legacy weapons with just a barrel change making it a low risk alternative.
Compared to 6.8x51 mm NGSW, 6.5x48 mm Creedmoor is fired at standard chamber pressures, so can use lightweight polymer cartridge technology. 7.62 mm NATO brass weighs 24 grams, 6.8 mm NGSW and 6.5 mm CM weigh 22 grams. But 6.5 mm CM polymer weighs 18 grams.
With the right projectile design, 6.5 mm Creedmoor can penetrate Level IV body armour at 300 metres, while defeating unprotected targets at 1,000 metres and beyond. The key disadvantage is reduced barrel life, but overall, the pros outweigh the cons.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(