There has been a lot of discussion around the effects of winter on operations. I thought I’d outline a couple of aspects of winter fighting that are both critical and often under appreciated. BLUF: Winter will likely favour the Ukrainian military. 1/17
A lot of discussion has revolved around the question of mud and tanks. We’ll circle back to this but fundamentally it is not significant. The real impact of winter is on infantry, secondly on logistics, and the impact on logistics has a secondary effect on military vehicles. 2/17
To begin with infantry. Winter sees the loss of a lot of cover as trees lack foliage. That means you have to keep low. Unfortunately low also means wet and muddy. Wet means cold. There is a limited period you can be wet and cold and remain alive. 3/17
Being able to dry yourself and warm up in this environment takes a lot of personal discipline. It means keeping your wet and dry kit separate. It requires you to meticulously manage your ability to transition from one to the other in field conditions. 4/17
If your dry kit gets wet you are on a fairly short timeline to becoming combat ineffective and need to get somewhere that has heat to dry yourself and your equipment. That probably means power or fire. Both of these things are scarce under field conditions. 5/17
The endurance and capacity of a force to operate in the field away from shelters is therefore closely tied to their personal discipline and survival skills. It is vital that junior leaders keep a close eye on their people and when someone gets cold and wet, withdraw them. 6/17
Now, the Ukrainians spent years defending the JFO through winter. Lots of the mobilised soldiers have experienced living in these conditions for months. The Ukrainian military also has reasonable junior leadership and people look out for one another. 7/17
If you look at Ukrainian fighting positions they tend to be well kept. People tend to have warm clothing and defensive lines often have areas that are kept clean, dry, and warm. Company commanders build these close to fighting positions. 8/17
Russian junior leadership has been heavily attrited. The newly mobilised personnel do not have the experience or skills to operate for extended periods in the field. They have not been issued with winter clothing for the most part. Their fighting positions are often a mess. 9/17
That will in itself see the Russians take casualties from exposure. It will also reduce the pace at which they can manoeuvre and make them more dependent upon centralised nodes for soldiers to recover. These nodes can be targeted. 10/17
For the Ukrainian military therefore they can inflict a lot of casualties just by skirmishing to keep the Russians in their fighting positions and timing attacks to prevent unit rotation. The result will be a high rate of death through hypothermia and disease. 11/17
Shifting to logistics, most military support vehicles are wheeled and both sides are heavily dependent upon commandeered civilian transport for resupply. People exaggerate how big a problem mud is for tanks. But it is a huge problem for wheeled logistics vehicles. 12/17
This means that logistics in winter is much more road-bound and this makes logistics vulnerable. It also narrows the number of axes along which resupply can move. A slow pace of resupply necessarily reduces the pace of operations 13/17
The impact on tanks and IFVs therefore is not that they can’t manoeuvre but that it takes longer to resupply them, repair them, and recover them if they get in trouble. That reduces the ability to exploit breaches made in a line and so makes offensive action more costly. 14/17
For the Ukrainian military, trying to rebuild combat power after its recent offensives, the aim this winter should be to use artillery, skirmishing and constant pressure to keep the Russians outdoors. The result will be bad for Russian morale, discipline and combat power. 15/17
Inflicting the maximum number of casualties through exposure also creates a need for the Russians to replace losses and this will see mobilised personnel pushed in with limited training, rather than being held as new units. That should help Ukraine keep the initiative. 16/17
So, the winter may see a reduction in large scale offensive action unless there is a collapse somewhere. That does not mean a reduction in fighting, or the levels of ammunition consumption. 17/17
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Russian Air War and Ukrainian Requirements for Air Defence; @Justin_Br0nk with Nick Reynolds and myself assess the stages of Russia's air and strike campaigns against Ukraine. rusi.org/explore-our-re… BLUF 1/17
Russian Aerospace Forces (VKS) conducted significantly more extensive fixed-wing strike operations during the first days of the invasion than has been previously documented, while Ukrainian ground-based air-defence (GBAD) capabilities were suppressed by initial attacks. 2/17
During this period, Ukrainian fighter aircraft inflicted some losses on VKS aircraft but also took serious casualties due to being totally technologically outmatched and badly outnumbered. 3/17
Thread on Methodologies for Assessment. There are a few different kinds of assessment that often get compared on social media when they aren’t necessarily comparable. For those who don’t work in the field, I thought I’d outline a couple of them and the challenges involved. 1/22
When reading any assessment ask why the assessment is useful to a decision maker. The first kind of assessment is prediction. “x is highly likely/likely/unlikely to happen”. This assessment flags a problem the decision maker is going to have to contend with 2/22
Another kind of assessment is an impact assessment: ‘if x happens these are the consequences’. This is important because it frames how a decision maker prioritises problems. An unlikely, but high impact event may still be worth investing resources to prepare for. 3/22
So, I got some things wrong in June and figured it is worth outlining why and how it changes analysis for the conflict. In short, the Russians have less ammunition than colleagues and I thought. Have to be wary jumping to opposite conclusion however. reuters.com/world/russia-i… 1/15
In June we were looking at the weaknesses in the Russian military (what could be targeted). Ammo was an obvious tactical target as it required fewer strikes than the guns. We outlined this publicly here: static.rusi.org/special-report…, 2/15
The question arose whether this would suppress Russian guns or cause long term shortages. Assessing Russian ammo was difficult. The question was not just about old Soviet stocks but also about their production since 1991, storage, wastage, and consumption. 3/15
Lots of debate about whether something is an offensive. I think there has been some confusion because the military use some ordinary terms to have specific technical definitions and it can lead to mil and non-mil statements no lining up exactly. Short thread outlining some 1/10
TACTICAL: A military action conducted using the resources organic to a military unit. Thus, a company attack is a tactical action by a company. A Brigade attack means an attack conducted with the organic assets of a brigade. Highest tactical echelon is Corps or CAA in Russia 2/10
ATTACK: An attack is an offensive tactical action. The order to attack will be given to a unit which will be briefed on the commander’s intent to seize an area, defeat a unit etc. 3/10
SPECIAL REPORT - Silicone Lifeline: Western Electronics at the Heart of Russia's War Machine. First in a line of work at @RUSI_org to deconstruct Russia's weapons and the covert supply chains that enable their manufacture. rusi.org/explore-our-re…
This study includes assessments of 27 Russian weapons systems including its missiles, rockets, communications, navigational equipment, EW complexes and SIGINT systems. All critically dependent upon western manufactured components. There is more to come.
James Byrne, Gary Somerville, Joe Byrne and Nick Reynolds and I collaborated with @Reuters investigators @StephenGrey, @stecklow and colleagues to show how critical weapons components have continued to flow to Russia after 24 February. reuters.com/investigates/s…
The @amnesty report demonstrates a weak understanding of the laws of armed conflict, no understanding of military operations, and indulges in insinuations without supplying supporting evidence. 1/4
It is not a violation of IHL for Ukrainian military personnel to situate themselves in the terrain they are tasked to defend rather than in some random piece of adjacent woodland where they can be bypassed. 2/4
The Ukrainian military has regularly urged civilians to leave areas of fighting and facilitated them doing so. Forcing displacement is itself a violation of IHL and throughout history many civilians have chosen to remain in areas where there are ongoing military operations. 3/4