From yesterday's @ObserverUK. @UnisNotBorders was cited in this piece about, Sulav Khadka, a migrant student from Nepal who was detained by UK border cops, claiming that he was a bogus student, sent to a detention centre in Scotland, & held for 10 days: theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/n…
🧵
.@UnisNotBorders stated in the piece that in the 6 years we have provided support for migrant university staff & students, we have come across cases, esp from migrant students who come from the Global South & subjected to harsh immigration questioning by UK border cops.
The piece goes on further to state from another student interrogated by UK border cops that they saw some Pakistani students who "were kept in a separate place for not being able to show [their] bank balance in a mobile app. God knows what happened to them."
The piece goes on to indicate that the university that Sulav Khadka was to enroll at, @YorkStJohn, refused to enroll him claiming that he had missed the 24 October deadline to enroll. As a result, his sponsorship was withdrawn, leaving him in a immigration + financial limbo.
Shamefully, @YorkStJohn did not even factor the immigration fiasco that Sulav Khadka was put in as a direct result of UK's draconian border regime that prevented him from enrolling before the deadline. Rather, the university also weaponised his precarious status against him.
What @ukhomeoffice & @YorkStJohn have done to Sulav Khadka is just a few elements of many of how the #HostileEnvironment policy is used to create barriers for all kinds of migrants in the UK. Now he'll return to Nepal in debt after borrowing ££, with no degree.
Academics on Twitter outraged about Sulav Khadka's case, but we think this outrage can be channelled better. Firstly, what Sulav Khadka experienced was also experienced by many other migrant students during the pandemic. We are referring to this: redpepper.org.uk/locked-out-dur…
At the time when migrant students were being forcibly withdrawn from their universities during a pandemic, for not being able to pay their tuition fees on time, we didn't see much outrage over this manner. Many of these students, like Sulav Khadka, went into debt, with no degree.
Secondly, as @UnisNotBorders has warned many times before, the increase digitalisation & use of AI & other software makes it easier to implement border violence & exclude migrants, such as for not having a mobile banking app or able to show electronic documentation.
Thirdly, if you saw our tweets yesterday re- the use of 'bogus migrant student' used by right-wing pundits & those in the Labour & Conservative parties [
] you'll know how this relates to how Sulav Khadka was mistreated at the border & by his university.
Furthermore, if Sunak or the rest of Conservatives, go ahead with further plans to limit migrant students from supposedly enrolling at 'low quality' degrees at largely post-92 institutions, we'll be seeing many more cases like that of Sulav Khadka in the future.
But again, the issue isn't to get outraged, but to get organised & join dots together. A #UCUstrike is happening. How many @ucu branches are engaging with their migrant students? How many of your branches have printed off our strike solidarity materials? linktr.ee/urbc
If you aren't doing those very tangible things, which also includes liaising with @UnisNotBorders & taking of our workshops, you have no right to be outraged. Also, you are part of the very problems that are harming migrant students & staff on your campuses.
If our words seem harsh, it's because @UnisNotBorders comes across these cases daily. @nusuk doesn't provide casework support for migrant students, SUs do not have adequate support structures to take on these kinds of cases & while @ucu is improving, it too has a long way to go.
Learn more about our work.
Liaise and contact us for workshops and for casework advice: unisresistbordercontrols [at] gmail [dot][ com
Why focus *only* on Nigerians? Would Nick be outraged if 50,000 white Canadians brought their dependents to the UK?
Right-wing pundit, Nick Timothy, is using the 'bogus student' line to promote disastrous Tory policies that will harm working class migrant students.
Brief 🧵
Bringing dependants as a migrant student is both not easy & very expensive. One has to pay visa fees which amount to £1,538 if the dependent is applying outside of the UK. Additionally, dependents have to pay the international health surcharge fee to access the NHS.
In total, if you are family of four, one migrant PGR student, three dependents applying from out of the UK, you are looking at spending £4,977 in visa fees and an additional £10,940 for the international health surcharge fee. And these fees are increasing each year.
Mid-2000s the discourse of the 'bogus migrant student' took hold of the UK right-wing media, making outrageous claims that *all* migrant students were illegally entering the UK on student visas. @UKLabour responded by instituting the first forays that started #HostileEnvironment.
When @GordonBrown was PM, he started the points based immigration system (PBIS) that ushered in immigration checks in universities on migrant student *and* staff. In 2009, SOAS Management used these checks to break apart the migrant-led @SOASJ4C campaign, deporting 9 activists.
A 🧵about @GNDRising disruption of Home Secretary Priti Patel's talk at the Bassetlaw Conservatives Association dinner.
This🧵seeks to critically interrogate this action from the perspective of Black & WoC migrants @UnisNotBorders to develop discussion & better practices.
We recognise the importance of disruptions, we also question the ethicality in putting funds into the Tory party. Dinners like this go for an excess of £400 or £4,000 a ticket. Source: mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…
How much did @GNDRising pay to the Tories to disrupt their meeting?
Is it ethical for @GNDRising, a new NGO, to use funds to pay to “disrupt” a Tory dinner attended by right-wing xeno-racist sycophantic followers of Priti Patel who care nothing for migrants? Did @GNDRising think that their disruption would elicit policy change from a fascist?
As @UnisNotBorders approaches another yr of organising during the Covid pandemic, we want to share highlights of what we've done in 2021 & what we hope to accomplish approaching our 6th yr of advocating for migrant university staff & students against #HostileEnvironment.
January 20201
@UnisNotBorders kept the pressure by amplifying in @FT the how UK universities were putting migrant student into destitution & how #NRPF, #HostileEnvironment & marketised higher education are all harming migrant students during pandemic: ft.com/content/3ab6be…
While the VC enjoys his Christmas, @UnisNotBorders has been assisting @USSU International Student Officer, @caituee on cases of migrant student homelessness @SussexUni. These cases are part of systemic issues including #HostileEnvironment + marketised higher education.
Student A is a migrant postgrad @SussexUni with their family (partner & 3 children). They arrived in October 2021 & since, have been moving from short-term let to another w/o any stable, long-term housing. Student A & their family's mental & physical health are deteriorating.
Student A's children have not been able to enroll in school since coming to the UK because of a lack of stable housing. Student A's has been so focused on finding housing that they can't focus on their coursework.
There have been a lot of superficial discussions re- clause 9 of the Nationality and Borders Bill which seeks to remove British citizenship without notice.
What isn't being discussed is clause 9 relation to extending UK's counter-terrorism/War on Terror laws.
Firstly, clause 9 didn't come out of nowhere. During the early days of the War on Terror, @UKLabour included the deprivation of British nationality section to the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
The deprivation of British nationality within the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 meant that if a British-dual national committed acts that seriously prejudiced the interests of the UK and it's overseas territories that their British citizenship would be revoked.