According to the “Sri Gur Pratap Prakash” written between 1835-1843 AD by Kavi Santokh Singh, #GuruTegBahadur said as below when Aurangzeb asked him to convert to Islam:
“I know my Hindu Dharma to be the best.
How can I forsake that which is very dear to me?
It (Hindu Dharma) gives immense joy in this world and the next.
Even life is trivial compared to honor.
The fool whose intellect is corrupted,
That idiot alone will forsake it.
I will endure harm to establish Hindu Dharma in this world.
It will will never be destroyed even if you try”.
It gives an essential perspective.
Here is another narrative from Panth Prakash of Giani Gian Singh (1822-1921 AD)when the little sons of Guru Gobind Singh were captured by Wazir Khan in December 1704 & were offered to chose between death & Islam, they said:
“It is well known in this world that we are the grandchildren of Guru Tegh Bahadur who went to Delhi and got himself beheaded rather than forsake his Dharma. Now, this group of Turks (Muslims) have threatened us with death but this Dharma will not go away.
We will not die merely for fear of Turks. We will remain Hindus till death. Time devours everyone one day. Respected brother, reflect that for this life of four days, why should we lose our Dharma?”
I deliberately used non-contemporary narrative about #GuruTegBahadur that too from 19th century to reflect that prominent Sikhs saw there Gurus very much as Hindus & their tradition as Hindu.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Look at audacity of @Arya_Anviksha_ that she even dares to quote Dr Elst who has written many pieces after 1998 basing a case that Gurus of Sikkhi were absolutely Hindus by faith.
Here in this thread I quoted one of his latest book published in 2019.
In the above mentioned thread in the tweet, I have shown how Dr Elst calls the people calling “Zafar Nama as an evidence to see Guru Govind as stooge of Aurangzeb” as silly.
Yes, social media has made us powerful but all mustn’t forget what happened to Bhasmasur.
The snippet collection of fabricated non-contextually placed Sikh Literature is going to backfire.
Perhaps, they don’t know how they are playing with the fire.
They are doing exactly what Khalistanis want & what Akalis had wanted along with Muslim league.
I fear, not for unity but the quest of people to be “known as intellectual” standing for Dharma & in process create enemies using the fodder passed on by true enemies.
We have lost the sense to think, analyse and react.
We have lost the sense of gratitude & arrogance has taken over. Perhaps this is time of ultra chaos. But we must reflect upon self, put in introspection.
“ One paper after another highlighted some quotes from contemporaneous writers in praise of Aurangzeb. These are easy to find, as he had the last say over their success or marginalization, even over life and death.
On Stalin too, you can easily find many contemporary sources praising him, and then silly academics concluding therefrom that he can’t have been so bad. Thus, one of the sources was Guru Govind Singh’s Zafar Namah or ‘victory letter.’”
“ If you quote it selectively, you might think he was an admirer and ideological comrade of Aurangzeb’s. But the Guru was strategically with his back against the wall and had to curry favour with the man holding all the cards.
Ok! :-)I may be wrong, & why not given that I’m not “know it all.”
But just a few corrections for you. The census of 1855 in Punjab didn’t record Christians b’coz record say there were no Christians in reality.
Next begin to go through the records & analysis of Punjab census. I’m away from my library hence quick parts from a paper. This clearly shows that Christians began to grow after 1881.
Jains also considered to be labelled as Hindus & so did Sikhs. Census records what people say.
In fact what’s interesting that in later census (1901 onwards) people began to be labelled as:
A) Indo Aryan (Hindus, Buddhists, Jains & Sikhs)
B)Semetic: Muslims, Christians & Jews
C)Animistic: Parsis
“Let the path of the pure (Khalsa panth) prevail all over the world, let the Hindu dharma dawn & all delusion disappear.(...) May I spread dharma and prestige of the Veda in the world and erase from it the sin of cow-slaughter.”
How will those making Sikhi (non+anti)-Hindu deal with these words of Guru Govind Singh?
How will they deal with the fact that Guru Govind Singh desired to impart Brahminical (as said), teachings to five of his disciples?
Khushwant Singh says:
“Gobind selected five of the most scholarly of his disciples and sent them to Benares to learn Sanskrit and the Hindu religious texts, to be better able to interpret the writings of the gurus, which were full of allusions to Hindu mythology and philosophy.”