Just looking at how few of Labor's seat wins are even remotely close it becomes clear that Labor has won this Victorian election by an enormous margin. #VicVotes
Assuming Labor wins at least one of Northcote and Preston (it may very well win both) that puts it on 52. To even get it out of majority just via 2PP swing in classic seats from there currently takes a 2PP swing of 6.6%.
Labor could have got a majority with a 2PP of 47.6 (though likely would have dropped a few more to the Greens if doing that badly). This is extraordinary. The hinge seat for majority based off classic 2PPs is Sunbury or Box Hill.
On current numbers to win or even tie by winning 2PP seats off Labor the Coalition needed to do 8.6 points better, ie 54.5% 2PP. Here some might have dropped to L-NP supporting indies, but the pendulum will just be ghastly for the Coalition.
The whole demographic realignment thing is playing out strongly in Labor's favour here. It's pushing seats that used to be around the state 2PP up the pendulum and giving Labor a structural advantage. I'll have an article about where this all ends up when figures are final.
This election was never within a million miles of a hung parliament.
The media have so woefully misread this election in search of hype about a close result and/or right-wing reader-service that they have given Daniel Andrews a licence to treat them like bugs for four years.
There's a lesson here. I don't think anyone anticipated just how much Labor was going to outperform in seat terms. But if you try to second-guess the polls and jump the wrong way you end not merely surprised but very wrong.
( #notallmedia of course. Collectively. There were exceptions, at least at article level.)
This chart illustrates the issue. Given that a few of Labor's 2CP marginal wins were vs Greens there has been a mass migration of ALP margins towards the 10% level (the range about 4-8 points above the state 2PP).
We'll see what the final result looks like but Victoria could be headed for a Lower House pendulum with a naturally developed skew to one side and serious legitimacy issues (like SA used to have).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Note: in general I will transfer a seat to assumed win status when it has been conceded, unless the concession looks premature.
I do not transfer seats just because the leader has claimed to have won.
Concession has no impact on counting and it is possible in theory for a candidate to concede and win. But in these kinds of post-counts where scrutineers have been looking at the evidence closely it is generally a reliable signal.
How many times can a Van Badham tweet be wrong? Let me count the ways, I expect it will take me some time ...
1. There is no evidence that whether Hanson would get elected was even a consideration when Senate reform was passed. Why should it have been; the party had polled a risible vote in 2013.
2. There is no evidence that the change made it easier for Hanson to get elected. She was elected by polling a DD quota in her own right. It was once the case that group tickets could be used to screen out ON but that had long since stopped being the case.
N Metro bouncing around a lot, Patten was way behind last night but now only about 0.9% behind on ATLs (which might even be barely winnable), and might improve when more absents go in.
The count in N Met is still very incomplete. The available data doesn't even break out the prepolls by district let alone PPVC which is very unsatisfactory for projections.
Oh no it wasn't. The sentence continued "despite a late surge in support for the Coalition in the final days [..]" The main evidence given for this supposed surge was (i) Liberal Party internals (ii) a Resolve poll that had gone out of field the previous Sunday.
The article went on to refer to "polls that point to a minority Labor government" as if this was a fact. There were no such polls.
Another article said "Labor remains on track to cling to power in Victoria, despite a late fall in its primary vote".
That article also referenced the week-old Resolve (which, true, had had a 2-point drop in the Labor primary compared to a previous poll taken four weeks before) and mentioned Newspoll but didn't mention that Newspoll showed Labor's primary increasing during the campaign.
Note that while Morgan did put out a forecast of 55 that was off their penultimate poll which had a 57-43 2PP. Their last poll was 55 2PP and their forecast was 48 seats (still a lot closer than some!)
Aside from overestimating Labor's losses to the crossbench (which pretty much everyone did) a problem with Morgan's final projection was reading off the pendulum and ignoring personal vote effects for starters.
Even so Labor has still overperformed my 2PP conversion model, because the 2PP swing fell in places where it didn't matter.
The cartoon baddie has taken the calculator lead in Northern Metropolitan. I will study this dumb deal.
I've actually had trouble getting out of looking at Northern Metro, NE Metro and Northern Vic to see if there is life in any of the others.
The dark one is ahead on ATLs in Northern Metro too now by half a percent. I'd still back Patten if the button was pushed right now but not if there is much further shifting in the count.