There are few things more revealing of an authoritarian mindset than wanting Google and Apple to use their monopoly power to act as internet overlords, dictating who can and can't be heard, what ideas are and are not permitted.
Yet that's our situation and so many seem grateful.
As a reflection of how twisted and inverted our politics have become, in order to be a good "liberal" or "leftist," one now much demand that the internet be censored by Silicon Valley monopolies.
To oppose this abuse of monopoly power somehow means you're on "the far right."
Earlier this year, @mtaibbi and I participated in a discussion with @DavidSacks in Miami on how we are now regularly called "right-wing" despite not having changed - literally - even one core view or value.
That's because this is what "far right" means:
That some leading Republicans are now waving the banner of free speech *and* anti-monopoly abuse is a good thing for everyone whose brains aren't permanently trapped in a primitive partisan prism. Many Dems now support good anti-trust bills, too:
This is exactly how Parler was destroyed for its refusal to obey the censorship orders of DC Democrats: Apple and Google removed the app from their stores, crippling Parler.
Threats of doing the same to Twitter have clearly been raised. It's an insane abuse of monopoly power.
Here's the story of what happened with Parler. It began when @AOC, using the liberal pro-censorship group @slpng_giants, publicly demanded Apple and Google remove Parler from its stores for failure to censor. It worked. Liberals abuse monopoly power:
In case anyone is questioning whether Google and Apple are really monopolies in the classic sense of anti-trust law, it is the formal position of the Dem-led House Antitrust Committee, now with major GOP support, that they (with FB and Amazon) are:
The now 3+ year imprisonment with no trial of Julian Assange - easily one of the most consequential Western journalists of his generation - makes US/UK lectures about press freedom a total farce. Good to see the media outlets who profited from his scoops finally defending him:
The most sickening part of Assange's brutal, lengthy imprisonment is the Biden Admin never wanted to bring him to the US to stand trial. Imagine the sideshow, the protests, the imagery.
They just wanted to keep him in a cage long enough to destroy him physically and mentally.
So many corporate journalists ignore or even cheer Assange's imprisonment. That he has broken more major stories than all of them combined - without being part of their clique - shames them and shows what they really are. His real crime was publishing docs incriminating Hillary:
WATCH: Our new nightly live program -- SYSTEM UPDATE -- will launch very soon on Rumble. To prepare, we have been airing test-run episodes for a limited audience.
My monologue last night explored the media's deranged panic over free speech on Twitter:👇
We are posting on Rumble segments of the pre-launch episodes: to give our audience a feel for what our show will be in our newly built studio.
Last night, I highlighted just how deranged is this media meltdown, and to explore what is driving their primal need for censorship:
This demented media meltdown has dragged into the light one of the newest media scams: they invent fake credentials ("disinformation researcher," "online safety expert") and then bestow them on their friends to masquerade their politicized agenda as scientific and data-driven.
Over the last 48 hours, multiple liberal outlets (including the WPost) equated free speech with mass murder, and blamed @elonmusk for large numbers of people soon to die -- without including a single person who disagreed with this insanity.
That free speech is murder - that many will die if we have just one social media platform not controlled by liberal journalists and academics - is inherently laughable.
That they refuse to quote anyone disagreeing with this inanity shows their real function: not journalism.
I have updated my profile to reflect that I, too, am now on online safety expert.
As an online safety expert, I am here to assure everyone that those of us in marginalized groups will find a way to survive even if Musk allows people disliked by Media Matters to be heard online✊
The leading agitators for online censorship insist it's needed to prevent hateful messages from circulating, since those incite rage and violence.
Just go check what they tweet all day. It's a never-ending flow of vicious hatred against their enemies, deliberately inciting rage.
The most-quoted person over the last 48 hours by liberal media outlets demanding more censorship on Twitter - and demanding Google and Apple remove them if they don't obey - is the trans activist @Esqueer_, one of the most relentlessly hateful people on this site. Look at this:
Caraballo is insinuating Mormons and Republicans are likely to produce non-binary mass murderers. Imagine the potential that has to incite violence toward Mormons.
But they think their hatred, their attacks and calumnies, are noble. Hateful insults by The Enlightened are sacred.
How can Ben Collins do his important and dangerous work of covering toxic extremists online if he now blocked me? How can Ben - Supreme White Male Ally-Protector of the Marginalized - monitor all the people I endanger? Unless this is about blocking me from reporting on him?