Third-quarter G.D.P. growth was revised up modestly, to +2.9% (annualized) from +2.6% in the initial estimate. The details look a bit stronger too: Final sales to private domestic purchasers (a measure of underling demand) now +0.5% annualized, vs. +0.1% in the initial estimate.
On the other hand, Gross Domestic Income (an alternate measure of economic output) rose just 0.3% annualized in Q3. (This is the first estimate for Q3 G.D.I.)
The weakness in GDI in Q3 is notable because for much of this year, economists were pointing to GDI as evidence that the economy was stronger than GDP suggested. But revisions changed that story quite a bit, and now GDI has been weaker than GDP for two straight quarters.
Over the longer term, GDI still shows a higher overall level of economic output than GDP. But the two measures tell a pretty similar story about the past year: Inflation-adjusted growth has ground nearly to a halt over the past four quarters.
On the other hand, headline G.D.P. has been pushed around by volatile trade and inventory components. Domestic demand (shown here in dark blue) has remained positive throughout this year. And today's revisions make it look a bit better than the initial release.
Consumer spending, meanwhile, has remained solidly positive, and much steadier than headline GDP. (And the Q3 figure was revised up.)
As @JordynJournals & @melbournecoal reported over the weekend, consumers have defied expectations by continuing to spend. nytimes.com/2022/11/27/bus…
It's important to keep this all in perspective, however. The economic rebound (whether measured by GDP, GDI, consumer spending...) has been very rapid by historical standards. GDP returned to its prepandemic trend by the end of last year, and even now is only modestly below it.
Lastly, a reminder that *nominal* (non-inflation-adjusted) output is WAY above trend. It's just that a lot of that demand is getting burned off in the form of inflation.
And with that, I leave you until 10 a.m., when we get #JOLTS.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For the Morning newsletter today, I looked at how higher interest rates are playing out very differently for homeowners on either side of the Atlantic. nytimes.com/2022/12/01/bri…
In the U.S., most homeowners have 30-year fixed-rate mortgages. That partly insulates them from the impact of both rising rates and high inflation: Their housing costs are fixed.
Different story in the U.K., where most mortgages carry much shorter fixed terms. Millions of homeowners there will face sharply higher housing costs in coming years. Some will have to move; many more will have to cut back spending.
More from @eshelouise: nytimes.com/2022/11/17/bus…
Job openings and quits both continued to edge down in October. Layoffs remain extremely low. #JOLTS
DATA: bls.gov/news.release/j…
There were 10.3 million job openings at the end of October, down from 10.7 million in September and a peak of close to 12 million early this year. Still very high by historical standards, but now clearly coming down.
There were 1.7 open jobs for every unemployed worker in October. The ratio had ticked up in September, but is now back to where it was at the end of the summer.
Fed officials have repeatedly cited the nearly 2:1 ratio as evidence of the very tight labor market.
Job openings rose in September, to 10.7 million. Still only partly offsets the big drop in August.
Quits rate held steady at 2.7%.
Layoffs remain very low (and dipped back down slightly). #JOLTS bls.gov/news.release/j…
Job openings edged back up in September, which isn't a big surprise given the huge drop in August. (Aug. also revised up, but only slightly.)
Basic story seems unchanged: Openings are falling, but from a *very* high level.
The uptick in job openings pushed back up the ratio of openings per unemployed worker, though it remains a bit below the 2:1 ratio we saw at the peak. Still lots of jobs out there!
August unrevised at +315k jobs. July's very strong gains revised up another 11k to +537k.
Labor force shrank slightly (-57k), participation rate ticks down a tenth, following August's big jump. These month-to-month changes are noisy, so this seems consistent with a gradual rebound in the labor force.