Just found a Jefferson quote from after the election of 1800:
If the Federalists tried to usurp the government (steal the election) he was "w/those who were determined not to permit it. because that precedent once set, would be artificially reproduced, & end soon in a dictator.”
There you have it.
If the Federalists had successfully declared a President pro tem (as they were discussing) rather than concede to the outcome of the presidential election, Jefferson and others knew full well that this was a sure pathway to dictatorship.
1/ Just recorded a webcast episode on generational change in American politics--inspired by Nancy Pelosi, Steny Hoyer, Jim Clyburn and others stepping aside as leaders in Congress, and Hakeem Jeffries and others stepping forward.
2/ It's easy to see generational change in the past (the post-Founding 1820s generation, anyone?). It's easy to underestimate it in the present.
Now is a moment to watch for patterns of change--to consider implications and interventions before things become set in place.
3/ In the 1820s, the Founding generation was passing. The next definable generation to arrive on the scene? Andrew Jackson heralded its arrival. A total, radical sea change in the culture, tone, and organization of politics, and the nation.
Let's see what we've got coming next.
1/ So…in the same way that the DJT presidency revealed the profound vulnerabilities of “norms,” the erosion of Twitter is revealing a vulnerability of democracy.
2/ It certainly isn’t THE public square. But it has acted as an important one.
I’ve been saying for quite some time that we’re in the midst of a crisis of “we.”
For better and worse—sometimes much worse—Twitter was a “we”-creator.
3/ It has been a place where groups can talk and cohere and plan.
Sometimes, the outcome of that has been VERY ugly.
But sometimes, it has forged community in a positive sense.
1. We really need to rethink how we—and how others—use polling data. Sometimes it’s not aimed at reporting. It’s an attempt to persuade—an electoral strategy—more than anything else.
They removed anti-choice statements from campaign websites.
As the thread below states, they distracted us w/planes of asylum seekers sent to other states—this election’s “caravans.”
(“Non-white people coming to get us”—a visceral non-fail prod for some)
They’re banking on “women are the weaker sex” nonsense to defuse righteous anger at rights removed, and give men on the right a sense of righteousness of their own.
This is what I'm interested to see--how Biden's address balances the dire need to discuss threats vs democracy vs how it deals w/issues of partisanship
They're related but not identical
Having a president directly address the preservation of American democracy is a big event.
1/ A few words on honor and the founders -- that relate to politics today. (Trust me.)
Elite men in early America DID worry about their honor - a combination of their reputation and their "value" as men -- particularly, public men (i.e. politicians).