John Ridge ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Profile picture
Dec 1, 2022 โ€ข 13 tweets โ€ข 6 min read โ€ข Read on X
Reports that ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Kh-22s are exploding mid-flight are the least surprising news I've heard all war. A ๐Ÿงตwith some thoughts. 1/13
The Kh-22 [AS-4 Kitchen] is a supersonic air-launched cruise missile originally developed as an anti-shipping missile. First entering service in 1962, it is the oldest standoff munition in ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ inventory. Production is estimated to have ceased around 1988. 2/13 ImageImage
The Kh-22 is carried exclusively by ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Tu-22M3 [Backfire-C] strategic bombers. The Tu-22M3 can carry up to 3 Kh-22s, though it is common for them to carry one or two at a time. 3/13 ImageImage
The most interesting and relevant technical aspect of the Kh-22 is its propulsion system. Unlike other cruise missiles that typically use jet engines, the Kh-22 uses an actual liquid-propellant rocket engine. 4/13 ImageImage
The Kh-22 is powered by a single R-201-300 engine developed by the Isayev Design Bureau (OKB-2). The R-201-300 uses TG-02 (also known as Tonka or Tonka-250) as the fuel and AK-27I, a formulation of inhibited red-fuming nitric acid (IRFNA), as the oxidizer. 5/13 ImageImageImage
TG-02 is a ~50/50 mixture of triethylamine and various isomers of xylidine. AK27I consists of ~73% nitric acid, ~27% dinitrogen tetroxide (NTO), and an iodine-based inhibitor. The inhibitor is present to prevent the nitric acid from rapidly corroding the oxidizer tanks. 6/13 Image
The combination of TG-02 and AK27I is hypergolic, meaning they ignite immediately upon contact with each other in the absence of an ignition source. While this simplifies engine design by not requiring a separate ignition system, it complicates propellant handling. 7/13
The Kh-22's propellants, combined with the age of the missiles, themselves likely goes a long way to explain these in-flight failures. The newest units are almost 35 years old. The R-201-300 is a maze of pumps and propellant lines that have valves, seals, etc. 8/13 Image
A single eroded seal could lead to a propellant leak that would easily cause an explosive engine failure, esp. since the propellants are hypergolic. For example, the Cygnus Orb-3 mission failed when one of Antares' 35-year-old NK-33 engines exploded shortly after launch. 9/13 ImageImage
Deviations in propellant composition due to improper storage could likewise cause a violent engine failure. For example, the nitric acid in IRFNA decomposes over time to nitrogen dioxide, water, and oxygen with exposure to light or elevated temperatures. 10/13 Image
Despite the presence of an inhibitor, IRFNA will still slowly corrode its storage tank. Over time, this will leech material from the tank walls and contaminate the propellant. Either of these effects could produce a significant deviation in propellant composition. 11/13
These deviations could easily produce temperatures or pressures that exceed design parameters or potentially cause unexpected combustion instabilities leading to violent vibrations capable of tearing the engine and missile apart. 12/13 Image
These are just a few examples of the innumerable failure modes that are possible when working with aged (and likely improperly stored/maintained) liquid rocket engines and propellants (that are also hypergolic). 13/13

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with John Ridge ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

John Ridge ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @John_A_Ridge

Oct 7, 2024
@Lesya_G @JSetka @P_Kallioniemi @MriyaReport @MriyaAid Hi Lesya, as you may know I was a volunteer on Walter Report, later Mriya Report, from May 2022 to January 2023.

I have Mriya Report internal communications that detail continuous coordination between MR and the MA board from the creation of MR in July 2022 through January 2023.
@Lesya_G @JSetka @P_Kallioniemi @MriyaReport @MriyaAid Given the turnover in the MA since then, Iโ€™m inclined to assume you may be unaware of that prior history.

The assertion there was no coordination between MA and MR is, from my perspective, demonstrably false. Iโ€™m happy to provide excerpted communications to that effect.
@Lesya_G @JSetka @P_Kallioniemi @MriyaReport @MriyaAid โ€œJoeโ€ refers to Joseph โ€œYehudaโ€ Friedberg and โ€œBโ€ is Alexander Bakus, then MAโ€™s Director of Treasury.

MR forked off from WR on July 17. Alex was intimately involved in the planning of this split and coordinated it with MA alongside Yehuda. Image
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Oct 2, 2024
A brief round up of what we do actually know thus far about Iran's ballistic missile raid against Israel, named "Operation True Promise 2" by the IRGC.

Starting with the missiles, Iran employed 180-200 medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs), including Ghadr, Emad, and Kheibarshekan or Fattah-1.
A derivative of the Shahab-3, Ghadr is a liquid-fueled MRBM that ordinarily carries a single separable reentry vehicle (RV). These specfic missiles have been upgraded with maneuvering reentry vehicles (MaRVs).

Ghadr is one of the primary missiles Iran employed against Israel in April during "Operation True Promise."
A further development of Ghadr, Emad is a liquid-fueled MRBM that carries a single separable MaRV. Alongside Ghadr, is one of the primary missiles previously employed against Israel in April. Image
Read 13 tweets
Aug 30, 2024
Having read the PCL a few more times, some added clarification.

It does not appear *classified* defense articles were exported to China, Russia, or Iran.

Unauthorized exports of classified defense articles were made to Australia, Germany, Norway, Canada, Israel, and the UAE.
Image
Although defense articles designated as Significant Military Equipment were exported to China without authorization, that SME does not appear to be classified. Image
Image
The unauthorized hand-carry of defense articles, specifically technical data, to Russia, Iran, and Lebanon by RTX employees on personal travel with company-issued electronic devices likely only concerns unclassified defense articles. Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 17, 2024
Ukrainian PATRIOT Remote Launcher Group with four claimed Launching Stations.

This is a real PATRIOT RLG as a M903 LS fires two PAC-3 rounds against an incoming Iskander-M. Effects are unclear, but the LS are likely damaged.

(Geolocation @klinger66)
1|6

Image
Image
Neither an Antenna Mast Group nor Communications Relay Group and Electric Power Unit are visible.

The CRG acting as the RLG's Launcher Control Station plus AMG and EPU are emplaced at a different site. RL1 enables the CRG/LCS to communicate with LS up to 10 km away via VHF.
2|6
Image
Image
Remote launchers optimize PATRIOT's defended area against tactical ballistic missiles but create dead zones for airbreathing threats.

Remoting launchers in this instance is unusual as the RLG does not have Dnipro within its defended area for TBMs with PAC-3 or PAC-3 MSE.
3|6

Image
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Jun 13, 2024
So what is S-500? S-500 is a long-range air and missile defense system operated by the VKS (Russian Aerospace Forces).

It is a direct derivative of S-300V, the principal long-range maneuver SAM operated by the SV (Russian Ground Forces).
1|23
Image
I won't detail the complete program history of S-300P/F/V as @ChungTzuW has already written excellent threads about them which I strongly recommend reading for context.

In short, all three systems emerged from a joint VKS/VMF/SV procurement program.
2|23
VKS/VMF requirements were focused on ABTs (air-breathing threats) while SV requirements were focused on TBMs (tactical ballistic missiles). This led to a divergence into S-300P/F and S-300V using radically different missiles and radars.
3|23
Read 23 tweets
May 24, 2024
Why is GLSDB more susceptible to Russian electronic warfare than SDB? A few thoughts.

SDB and GLSDB are identical and share a GPS/IMU set. The relevant differences are range and target selection.
1|5

(Repost due to typo)
Image
GLSDB has a range of >150 km while SDB has a range of ~110 km from a ~12 km release altitude and ~270 m/s release airspeed.

Position error due to accumulated inertial measurement unit drift is quadratically proportional to time of flight and range by extension.
2|5 Image
Per interviews with Ukrainian pilots, they are typically releasing JDAM-ER at ~8 km. As SDB's employment profile is likely extremely similar, this is going to bring its range to <100 km.
3|5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(