** @newprisoner6 monologues are readable on Substack and all Podcasts are viewable/audible on MANY platforms. Please subscribe 🙏
👇👇 linktr.ee/thenewprisoner…
.@MassAGO staying silent even though she knows.@burnslev is engaging in criminal extortion of over $410,000 of my due inheritance from their murder of Dad on March 15, 2019...
@McAdooGordon@KingMakerFT@ProfMJCleveland What they said was is that the mandamus was not seeking relief from an order--that the relief sought was asking a judge to rule in a certain manner; they emphasized mandamus was not seeking relief from an order.
@McAdooGordon@KingMakerFT@ProfMJCleveland Example of needed framed request for relief: seeking the order of May 13, 2020 to be stricken based on erroneous denial to dismiss...
Which is different than asking the court to direct a judge to make a specific ruling as if the judge didn't make a decision.
Here are D.C. Court of Appeals Judge Srinivasan's own direct written words regarding a prosecutor's decision to bring or not bring criminal charges in the decision of U.S. v. Fokker,
818 F.3d 733 (D.C. Cir. 2016):
2/ "The Executive's primacy in criminal charges is long settled. That authority stems from the Constitution's delegation of 'take care' duties, U.S. Const. art II, section 3, and the pardon power."
3/ Judge Srinivasan described factors that a prosecutor's decision:
"the strength of the case, the prosecution's general deterence value, the govt's enforcement priorities and the case's relationship to the govt's overall enforcement plan."
@ThyConsigliori Specifically, I will show how Judge Sullivan’s May 13, 2020 Order to appoint Ret. Judge Gleeson as an “amicus curiae” indicates premeditated joint venture intended to influence, impede due & proper administration of the law in a pending DOJ court proceeding.
@ThyConsigliori 1/ 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1505 (Obstruction of Justice) states:
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due & proper administration of the law (cont'd below)
2/ In Part 1 of my D2J blog article Judge Emmet Sullivan Wears No Clothes, I explain how and why Judge Sullivan’s court order appointing Ret. John Gleeson as “amicus curiae” is in fact a sham—
3/ I specifically, walk the reader through 50 U.S.C. Sec. 1803(4), the federal statute that defines the scope and purpose of an “amicus curiae”.