A MUST: check out @newprisoner6's awesome THOUGHT PROVOKING monologues 🔥
@newprisoner6's monologues are MOST AWESOME via audio which PLEASE DO:
rumble.com/v1yhoeu-sediti…

. . .AND Here is Sedition EP63 Monologue in "black & white"--see below thread:
** @newprisoner6 monologues are readable on Substack and all Podcasts are viewable/audible on MANY platforms. Please subscribe 🙏
👇👇
linktr.ee/thenewprisoner…

#Synergy🔥

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lisa S. Belanger, J.D. in Karma

Lisa S. Belanger, J.D. in Karma Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TPCLJ

Sep 25, 2021
.@MassAGO staying silent even though she knows.@burnslev is engaging in criminal extortion of over $410,000 of my due inheritance from their murder of Dad on March 15, 2019...
@MassAGO @burnslev THREAD
1/ filed on Monday, 9.21.2021 in federal court in Massachusetts District Court (1st circuit)
Docket No. 1:21-cv-11453-FDS

Emergency injunctive &declaratory action re extortion for whistleblowing re court appointees exploitation re Netflix aired documentary #GuardianInc Image
2/ Image
Read 59 tweets
Nov 3, 2020
Here's my mojo for We The People on November 3, 2020

Ain't No Stopping US NOW!! 💪🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

We're on a groove!!!
cc: @realDonaldTrump @RichardGrenell
💪🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
2/ 💪🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲 Ain't No Stoppin' US NOW
Read 4 tweets
Sep 2, 2020
@McAdooGordon @KingMakerFT @ProfMJCleveland What they said was is that the mandamus was not seeking relief from an order--that the relief sought was asking a judge to rule in a certain manner; they emphasized mandamus was not seeking relief from an order.
@McAdooGordon @KingMakerFT @ProfMJCleveland Example of needed framed request for relief: seeking the order of May 13, 2020 to be stricken based on erroneous denial to dismiss...

Which is different than asking the court to direct a judge to make a specific ruling as if the judge didn't make a decision.
@McAdooGordon @KingMakerFT @ProfMJCleveland Just my 2 cents. I appreciate your letting me participate in your discussion. 🙏
Read 5 tweets
Aug 27, 2020
1/
D2J Thread
August 26, 2020

Here are D.C. Court of Appeals Judge Srinivasan's own direct written words regarding a prosecutor's decision to bring or not bring criminal charges in the decision of U.S. v. Fokker,
818 F.3d 733 (D.C. Cir. 2016):
2/
"The Executive's primacy in criminal charges is long settled. That authority stems from the Constitution's delegation of 'take care' duties, U.S. Const. art II, section 3, and the pardon power."
3/ Judge Srinivasan described factors that a prosecutor's decision:
"the strength of the case, the prosecution's general deterence value, the govt's enforcement priorities and the case's relationship to the govt's overall enforcement plan."
Read 10 tweets
Jun 9, 2020
@ThyConsigliori Specific criminal offense at the end of Judge Sullian's road. Question is will AG Barr fulfill his sworn oath & duty?
👇
@ThyConsigliori Specifically, I will show how Judge Sullivan’s May 13, 2020 Order to appoint Ret. Judge Gleeson as an “amicus curiae” indicates premeditated joint venture intended to influence, impede due & proper administration of the law in a pending DOJ court proceeding.
@ThyConsigliori 1/ 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1505 (Obstruction of Justice) states:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due & proper administration of the law (cont'd below)
Read 4 tweets
Jun 7, 2020
#JudicialLawlessness
#NationwideCrisis

1/ D2J BLOG Thread Part 2:
Judge Emmet Sullivan Wears No Clothes
by Lisa Siegel Belanger, J.D. (*actively licensed)
June 7, 2020

@TamaraLeigh_llc @ThyConsigliori
@GenFlynn @BarbaraRedgate @realDonaldTrump Image
2/ In Part 1 of my D2J blog article Judge Emmet Sullivan Wears No Clothes, I explain how and why Judge Sullivan’s court order appointing Ret. John Gleeson as “amicus curiae” is in fact a sham—
3/ I specifically, walk the reader through 50 U.S.C. Sec. 1803(4), the federal statute that defines the scope and purpose of an “amicus curiae”.

Here is Part 1
👇
Read 110 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(