The sleazy, pro-censorship pack of liberal employees of media corporations united last night to attack @mtaibbi -- as they do to any journalist who breaks a real story about real power centers -- and, because they were so desperate to discredit it, showed what they are. Watch: ImageImageImageImage
First, click on this link. Just click it. You'll see how these liberal media employees operate as a hive mind, an in-group pack, reciting the same phrases on cue. They have no novel thoughts. They're Democratic Party activists who unite as pack animals:

Second, as usual, these people - who demand the power to censor the internet to protect you from disinformation - are the most frequent and casual liars.

More than I can count made this false claim: @mtaibbi admitted there was no government involvement, contradicting @elonmusk ImageImage
Go look and you'll see the whole mindless liberal pack making this point: "LOL, Elon claimed there was government involvement when Taibbi admitted in tweet 22 there's none."

Now, look at Taibbi's tweet: he's saying there's no evidence of *foreign government* involvement, not US: Image
You have to be either extremely stupid or extremely dishonest to think Taibbi was saying he found no evidence of US political officials involved.

The *whole point* of the story is that Biden officials and Dem politicians pressured Twitter to censor. Taibbi said it over and over.
In fact, the tweet they're pointing to - to claim @elonmusk lied by saying Dem officials were involved - says the opposite.

That's the whole point! Twitter lied when saying they censored this story because the docs were hacked by Russia. They know there was no evidence of this! ImageImage
Do you see how casually these liberal media people lie? They're monkeys; they see others in their clique saying it, so they start mouthing it.

They don't understand the key point Taibbi's story: Twitter's "foreign govt hacking" pretext for censoring was a lie, and they knew it. ImageImage
Third, we have the personal attacks on Taibbi - from all the people who could not match his journalistic accomplishments if they had 100 lives to try.

Again, the more big stories you break, the more these frauds - who just repeat what CIA and Google tell them to say - hate you. ImageImage
It's always the same thing with these people who know they break no stories and live in a mindless liberal herd: oh, "they used to be so good, the downfall is so sad, etc."😢

Their lives are only about serving the Dem Party. That's the only metric they know for "good journalism"
The reason these people insist Taibbi's story is trivial is they will not and cannot recognize any scandalous or improper behavior by leading Dem politicians. Ask them to name any. Any critique of leading Dems is automatically, to them, a fraud, a "nothingburger." They're Dems.
The most pitiful part of their attack is the utter lack of self-awareness. They claim Taibbi serves power.

The hegemonic force in DC, Hollywood, academia, the US Security State, and corporate media is DNC liberalism: *them*. Their lives are about nothing but servitude to power. Image
When they unite for their melodramatic routine about how "sad" it is to see our "downfall" (😢) what they mean is they know we harbor contempt for their hegemonic liberal institutions. We have always regarded CIA, Wall St, corporate media with scorn and still do: that's *them.*
Do any of these fucking posers on the liberal-left ever wonder why CIA worked with their favorite corporate media employees (@NatashaBertrand) to sabotage Trump, not Biden? Do they ever ask why corporations and Big Tech follow commands from Media Matters, not right-wing groups?
It's because - as devastating as it is to their self-image as brave dissidents and radicals - nobody in any power center regards *them* as threatening. They're their servants, useful tools for these institutions of power. No Dem politician or group would be censored by Big Tech. ImageImageImageImage
Watching little obedient dweebs at NBC, CNN and the Daily Beast claim *Matt Taibbi* is a servant to power is the most brazen case of projection I've ever seen.

Taibbi spent his career and still does exposing Wall St and CIA's lies (Russiagate). They are their loyal mouthpieces.
Finally, don't let the mindless chirping of disinformation agents in the largest corporate media outlets distract from what these docs reveal.

That's what they're trying to do: turn themselves into a sideshow of clichéd insults to train their followers to believe this is trivial
These docs show what we already knew, but offer new, specific proof:

1) Dems explicitly demand more censorship from Big Tech.

2) Dems have an open line to do it.

3) Twitter knew it was lying when censorsing the Biden story days before the 2020 election

This is the biggest media scandal in a decade. Most major media outlets united to disseminate an absolute lie concocted by the CIA: the Biden archive was "Russian disinformation."

The lie was obvious. Here's what I said a week after the NY Post's story:

I've been covering this story for almost two years. Remember: I quit the media outlet I co-founded when they censored my story based on the CIA's lie - which @theintercept had ratified and laundered the week before - because anyone who wanted to could see what was going on then. Image
Not one media outlet that spread this CIA lie - that everyone knows is a lie - has admitted that they did this or explained what happened. That's because they lied on purpose.

And that's why these media employees are so enraged at Taibbi: they hate being reminded of their fraud.
Last night after Taibbi reported these, I went live on Rumble - from our new studio for our soon-to-debut live Rumble program - to analyze and reconstruct the full events. The story deserves way more attention than it will get from media propagandists.…
Never forget the person they chose to start this lie: the single worst and most dishonest US Security State propagandist in corporate media, @NatashaBertrand, who got promoted and promoted and promoted again the more she lied. Lying is how one advances in liberal corporate media. ImageImage
To claim it's dubious or even debatable that the Democratic Party uses its political power over Big Tech to force them to censor as Dems demand is wretched propaganda. Dems do exactly this -- explicitly and out in the open: censor or we will punish you.…
Last point: reducing NY Post's reporting to Hunter Biden's sex life and drug use is pitiful.

I've always said that's irrelevant. The stories were about *Joe Biden's* sleazy business dealings in Ukraine and China.

If the archive was trivial, why did they all lie to censor it? ImageImageImageImage
But at this point, the real story long ago ceased being about the contents of the Biden archive itself.

The real story is how the CIA, corporate media and Big Tech all united to spread a CIA lie and manipulate the 2020 election by using it to censor reporting about Joe Biden. Image
Listen to Mark Zuckerberg himself explain who influenced Facebook's decision in Oct. 2020 to announce -- through lifelong Dem Party operative @andymstone -- that FB would algorithmically suppress the NY Post's reporting on the Biden family's businesses:

By the way, it was barely a month ago when @lhfang and @kenklippenstein published new blockbuster documents proving Homeland Security plays a direct role in Big Tech's censorship decisions.

The same people attacking @mtaibbi's story attacked this, too:…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

Mar 19
A prolific American user of TikTok (LukeDavidJohnson) urges skepticism about the stated motives for why the US Security State and both parties are so eager to ban the app, one that 100 million Americans voluntarily choose to use. Even if you support the ban, it's worth hearing.
Here's Part 2. ACLU's argument for why a USG ban on TikTok violates the 1Am is it denies to Americans the ability to communicate on an app the USG doesn't control (as he says, the same reason they hate New Twitter). Not everything done in the name of anti-China sentiment is wise:
One thing worth remembering: the US Govt (DoD, NSA and State) constantly works to allow citizens of other countries it wants to destabilize to use the internet freely: free from control of their governments. All other platforms (except perhaps New Twitter) has USG control. Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 18
This person is undeniably one of the most influential Dem Party thought leaders: the explosion of his platform is due to liberals; Bush-era liberal bloggers spread his Word; to CNN and MSNBC hosts, he's a wise statesman; and the views he's always held are now Dem Party orthodoxy:
What's most bizarre is that @BillKristol -- along with other key advocates and architects of the worst US crime of that generation such as @DavidFrum and @NicolleDWallace -- run campaigns demanding "accountability": for Trump, but *never* for themselves:

One bizarre and twisted part of neocon culture: it's more nepotistic than Hollywood. Bill Kristol, Jonah Goldberg, Robert Kagan and his wife Victoria Nuland, John Podhoretz - so many - owe their careers to famous neocon parents. It shapes their worldview:…
Read 6 tweets
Mar 17
Hunter Biden just sued the Delaware repair shop where he left his laptop for invasion of privacy and distributing his data.

The obvious premise is that the laptop was real and it came from that store - the exact opposite of what all corporate media claimed for the 2020 election:
There has been a mountain of evidence proving all the materials used by the NY Post to report on Joe Biden were authentic. Now Hunter Biden admits it and that it came from this store.

**Not one outlet** that spread the pre-election "Russian disinformation" lie has retracted it. ImageImageImageImage
Permit me to explain why not one corporate outlet that spread this proven lie -- these materials were "Russian disinformation" -- has retracted it.

Retracting errors is what legitimate journalists do.

These outlets exist to lie for political ends.

Read 4 tweets
Mar 15
A huge number of employees of media corporations bearing the HR title "journalist" are now very open and candid about the fact that they are Dems, promote Dems, and want Dems to win.

On any given day, look at the time-line of NBC News "reporter" @oneunderscore__. It's the DNC's.
Axios fired the reporter evidently who responded to the DeSantis tweet with such a blatantly partisan response (he would never, ever respond to a Biden or Gavin Newsom email that way).

Media outlets are going to be facing dilemmas like these a lot more:

Many take credit for this but I started writing back in 2006 in opposition to the fraud of journalists claiming "objectivity." My 2013 exchange with NYT editor Bill Keller was on this: journalists lose credibility with the conceit of objectivity.

Read 5 tweets
Mar 15
Finally - as a result of DeSantis' statement - the fact key sectores of the two parties now have radically different views on foreign policy and militarism, and Dems are almost unanimously united behind neocons, is becoming clear:
And it's funny how 3 weeks after the NYT trumpeted how ideologically diverse they are by hiring a new conservative (@DavidAFrench), he's heaping praise on Biden for being so much "stronger" on Russia than Trump and DeSantis.

Weird how often NYT conservatives herald Dems.
Every time @BillKristol wants to gin up support for his favorite new war, he proclaims it "the defining foreign policy issue of our time."

That Trump/DeSantis are getting attacked by Kristol, Lindsey and Liz Cheney shows he's on the right track.

Read 8 tweets
Mar 14
I've seen this same thing in parts of Western Europe and most definitely Brazil:

If you convince the elite sector that what they're fighting is so singularly Evil, and that therefore they and their cause are so Just and Noble, they will conclude power, literally, is justified:
"We have to become authoritarian and despotic to defeat authoritarianism and despotism" --

It's shocking and scary how easily you can get people to embrace that view. That's what made the notorious Sam Harris video so important: he laid it out perfectly:

One of the things I appreciate about the censorship debate in Brazil is it's much more honest.

In the US, nobody can admit they support censorship, so they need euphemisms: "we just want content moderation."

In Brazil: "yes, we will censor, because we're Good and they're Bad." Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!