Thread by @DemokratieDr

Thesis
The highest goal of all human beings, as far as they have not been damaged in soul and spirit, is a life in peace, in community and in love.
In contrast, there are numerous conflicts in all areas ...

A worldwide collective human, non-violent evolution and revolution of revolution towards a non-violent & non-rule, cooperative society of the greatest possible freedom, participation, development and diversity for all people without exception is humanly possible.

Non-violent means preventing, stopping, resisting and overcoming injustice & at the same time not fighting the one who does it as a human being, seeing him as an enemy, even dehumanising & killing the other, but (always trying) to win him.

In its original sense, a revolution is a fundamental, root-and-branch change in society. The term revolution was then I suspect also partly consciously defined as a dangerous violent (bloody) event.

and at the same time it was applied to all kinds of areas, such as a technical revolution, in advertising ... so that the term took on a negative meaning and a superficial significance.

The revolution of the revolution means a fundamental change of the revolution towards absolute non-violence and thus towards a fundamental change of society in an absolutely non-violent way, ...

so that as a result of the revolution one does not oneself become again like that against which one has revolted.

The result of the revolution of the revolution should not only be the exchange of the rule of one group (class) for the rule of another group (class), but to overcome rule of people over people in general, i.e. fundamentally.

The revolution of revolution has as its goal to overcome the division of humanity into rulers and ruled, and to bring the common, cooperative and collective of all people back to the fore.

Previous revolutions have often allowed themselves to be tragically controlled, manipulated or transformed by parts of the rulers, and have repeatedly allowed themselves to be lured onto sideshows ...

and onto an exchange of the rulers, in order to (absolutely ineffectively) waste an infinite amount of cognitive and emotional energies there.

Instead of emphasising the common ground with those who still rule (and thus with all people without exception), from which action could emerge, groups' and small groups' own experiences of suffering were and are overemphasised, which then makes common action hardly possible.

The best example is currently the wokeness and identity politics that divide society and are intended to prevent any fundamental revolution (and thus the overcoming of the existing rule of the huge fortunes).

why the wokeness as well as numerous astroturfings like #Unteilbar #FridaysForFuture #LetzteGeneration, which (are supposed to) divert society's attention to sideshows, are financed by the families of the huge fortunes.

Again and again:
The big challenge is to overcome capitalism without becoming what you want to overcome yourself. You cannot fight fascism with fascism because then you become a fascist yourself.