Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Dec 4 8 tweets 5 min read
Sabhanayagar temple judgement interpreting Art 26 in line with Deity's constitutional mandate in force

"Devaswoms & matters connected therewith.. shall not in any respect be within scope or purview of council of ministers or the legislative assembly"

Image
The resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute which established that principles of Travancore Constitutional Rama Rajya continues to be in force in view of merger promise also establishes above constitutional mandate of the Deity also in force in Art 26
Image
In addition to the points made in the important programe it is now time to implement the constitutional mandate of Deity esp after resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute which continues to be in force and is not in favor of Govt control of Hindu Temples

It is the Dharma of SC post resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute to ensure that Constitutional mandate of Deity which is in force and part of Art 26 as interpreted in Sabhanayagar Deity judgement is implemented and Temples freed from Govt control
Since part of Travancore Kingdom is also in TN the constitutional mandate of Deity which is clear and in force and also part of Art 26 in view of Sabhanayagar Deity judgement is to be obeyed which adds force to the notice given by Dr @Swamy39
Constitutional mandate of Deity which is in force as made clear by resoln of Art 363 #Kantara & based on details shared by panelists the principle
"deity, cannot in law consent to anything which may amount to an extinction of the deity itself"
applicable
Further the resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute and constitutional requirement for SC to apply principles of Dharma makes the collections for "service" a tax and not fee anymore and it is time for SC to plug this path that it has created in 1954.
Post Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution Let SC start by applying principles of Dharma to resolve the issue of Govt control of Hindu temples Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rangarajan chilkur

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @csranga

Dec 7
Picture Translated

"राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
We The People & Bharat(inclusive of all living beings) belong to Shri Rama & His property law in Art 26 (d) when property defined 👆takes color of Dharma & duty of SC with यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem to protect Image
A Picture is worth a thousands words true 👆

But it does not govern the interpretation of our constitution by SC

So there is a need to translate it into words

Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community has done this great devotional service to our Nation Bharat

What the Rama Rajya picture conveys is present in Ramayana in the words of Bharata
Shri Marthandavarma made this definition of spiritual property of Shri Rama with minor change into a legal definition that can be asserted in Court through deed of dedication of Travancore Kingdom Image
Read 24 tweets
Dec 6
"..right of the deity to follow His Dharma flows from Article 25(1) and Article 26 of the Constitution." When argument rejected by SC
Shri Rama Raja have linked यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in SC emblem with right u Art 26 read w Art 363 & Art 372 through Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution Image
Thread describes how victory of dharma achieved in Art 363 #Kantara dispute through devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community
Shri Rama Raja of Constitution has used the argument of the State agreed to by Judiciary that agreement between British Queen and Prince of Arcot continues to be in force u Art 372 to good effect to enforce Thrippadidanam obligation inherited by SC which is also in its emblem 👆 ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
Dec 6
In this thread on Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community contributions covered the role of Dr Ambedkar who belonged to the community in inserting Art 26 and explaining meaning of God in Constitutional Oath basis for Bharat:India2.0 Constitutional Rama Rajya

Image
While Dr Ambedkar felt Art 32 was Atma of our Constitution resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute has shown that Art 26 is the Antaratma of our Constitution which was inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya with a key role played by Dr Ambedkar which is recorded
While Travancore Maharajas went to Shri Padmanabha Swamy temple daily to secure guidance of Ruler Deity to fulfill Thripadidanam obligation the same is achieved through Constitutional Oath which has been explained by Dr Ambedkar in the Constituent Assembly
Read 15 tweets
Dec 5
"राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
We The People & Bharat(inclusive of all living beings) belong to Shri Rama & His property law in Art 26 (d) when property defined 👆takes color of Dharma & duty of SC with यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem to protect
ImageImage
Bharatha's definition of property in Ramayana with slight modification became legally valid through deed of dedication of Marthandavarma and applying SC Ayodhya judgement along with Ruler Deity status u Art 363 securing Part III rights and definition of law as Dharma by Rajaji👆 Image
Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution has established
Travancore Constitutional Rama Rajya as defined above thus continues to be in force
Read 9 tweets
Dec 5
The correct interpretation of our Constitution👇thru resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute secured by devotional efforts of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community highlighting constitutional dharmik duty of SC in our Bharat : India 2.0 Constitutional Rama Rajya
ImageImage
SC has inherited Constitutional Thrippadidanam obligation is how we understand Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution and explained in 👇 thread and how the Oath binds Hon'ble SC Judges as explained by Dr Ambedkar in Constituent assembly in context of Art 60
ImageImage
Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution converts the moral obligation of Oath of Hon'ble SC Judges as explained by Dr Ambedkar when violated then Shri Rama Raja God of our Constitution can raise Art 363 dispute to ensure dharmik guidance which Hon'ble SC Judges Oath binds is followed Image
Read 10 tweets
Dec 5
"राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
We The People & Bharat(inclusive of all living beings) belong to Shri Rama & His property law in Art 26 (d) when property defined 👆takes color of Dharma & duty of SC with यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem to protect
Image
Chilkur Balaji Temple has been ground zero for both resistance against draconian 30/87 Endowments Act and also Sabarimala judgement conclusion that Deities have ZERO rights resulting in Art 363 #Kantara dispute.
Hon'ble late Justice Rama Jois' foreword and above resoln of dispute ImageImage
How यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in SC emblem is part of Deity Rights and Constitutional Rama Rajya is now explained through Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution hope SC will do its constitutional duty and ensure principles of Dharma are followed in pending cases

thehindu.com/opinion/lead/f…
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(