@hartgroup_org@ClareCraigPath @MHRAgovuk have confirmed that the @Pfizer_UK BA4/5 vaccine was approved based on BA1 data.
Even more worrying this was not a Regulation 174 temporary authorisation, it is full marketing authorisation.
👇
Regarding the authorisation of Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA4-5 (15/15 micrograms)/dose dispersion for injection COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside modified – PLGB 53632/0012), the following information is on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) website (ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/h…)
👇
“Apart from containing mRNA matching different, but closely related, Omicron subvariants, Comirnaty Original/BA1 and Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.4-5 have the same composition. Therefore, based on clinical studies showing that Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.1 triggers an immune👇
response to the original strain and Omicron BA.1, Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.4-5 is expected to generate an immune response against both the original strain and the subvariants BA.4 and BA.5.
In particular, Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.4-5 is
👇
expected to be more effective than Comirnaty at triggering an immune response against the BA.4 and BA.5 subvariants. These data are further supported by non-clinical laboratory data on the ability of Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.4-5 to trigger an adequate immune response.”
👇
The above medicinal product has not been granted temporary authorisation via Regulation 174, it has been granted a marketing authorisation. Further information, including the Public Assessment Report (PAR) published by the EMA is available via the link above. 👇
The UK Patient Information Leaflet (PIL) and Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) is available via the below link, a PAR will be published for this product in the next 60 calendar days.
👇
Sorry the link to the PIL & Summary of Product Characteristics was missing from the FOI response (an error by @MHRAgovuk), it is here gov.uk/government/pub…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My live petitions, plus a few from others
Petition: Launch a Public Inquiry into the approval process for covid-19 vaccines petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6281…
👇
There are a few things we can do to make a difference:
-respond to the @GOVUK covid inquiry
-tell people the stories of the vaccine injured & bereaved
-tell people the poor process the booster approvals have been through
-sign relevant petitions
-join @Togetherdec
👇
Understand the plight of the vaccine injured & bereaved watch this video from @OracleFilmsUK
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion oraclefilms.com
Or read individual stories here @VIBUK1@ukcvfamily
Wear a @VIBUK1 ribbon
👇
Tell everyone that @moderna_tx BA1 booster was approved despite negative efficacy @Pfizer_UK BA1 data is not available & the PAR is missing key information
“We only really learn about benefit risk in clinical use, and we knew there would be a vast influx of reports of side effects, no effective medicine or vaccine is without them”
I have not tried this before but have seen it work for some
Pls will you follow me to:
-Raise awareness of the booster approval issues
-Share my petitions:
--Remove 💉 manufacturer indemnity
---Open an inquiry into covid contracts
--Change the legislation used for Lockdowns
👇
BA1 booster approval, despite lower performance than original
Lack of transparency from MHRA
This petition means the vaccine injured now know they can claim against the manufacturers using the Consumer Protection Act.
Next step, make the manufacturers pay, not the government
Petition: Remove indemnity from the manufacturers of covid-19 vaccines petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6191…
👇