Just for the record: I've seen nearly zero right-wing "hate speech" since I've been on Twitter.
I have seen a whole lot of hateful leftists threatening to kill me and falsely and abusively calling me a "Nazi."
There appears to be a general sentiment that the mood has changed, so people who might have made posts in anger are less likely to do so.
Elon's takeover has been a wild ride, but we can all see that the arc of Twitter bends towards justice.
Most "anger speech" (which is a more accurate term than "hate speech") comes from a sense of helplessness, and the sense of helplessness comes from feeling as though you're not being heard.
Versions of "words have power" and "words have consequences" are popular statements among censorship advocates.
These slogans are seemingly benign. We have to consider the context and the implications in order to understand what it is they are trying to communicate.
At the outset, it must be acknowledged that encouraging people to commit acts of violence is already illegal, and should be illegal.
Censorship advocates claim that certain ideas inherently contain incitement to violence (or other anti-social action), and that even if these ideas are allowed to be shared, they will "inspire violence, etc." by hijacking the minds of people who hear them.
It's important to analyze what these censorship people are saying, because they obfuscate it.
They are literally saying they want to restrict free access to information in order to manipulate the way people develop their core beliefs about man and the universe.
This is in opposition to the traditional American/Western view that people should have free access to information and then make up their own minds about what they believe.
By making various outrageous claims about the consequences of free speech, while silencing free speech advocates, the establishment is censoring the discussion of censorship. It's a kind of censorship singularity.
There has been a lot of talk about "soy boys" and endocrine disruptors being responsible for the current state of the Western man, but somehow, masturbation is not mentioned as a cause of dropping testosterone.
I think that's literally a bot. I read about it. If I'm not mistaken, it's a multimillion dollar project that harasses you if you disagree with the State Department.
This idea that if you disagree with imprisoning journalists and whistleblowers you're a Russia agent is insidious. Russia is the enemy of the State Department, therefore anything they don't like is from Russia, therefore no American can ever disagree with the government.