Thread by @csranga

"राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
We The People & Bharat(inclusive of all living beings) belong to Shri Rama & His property law in Art 26 (d) when property defined 👆takes color of Dharma & duty of SC with यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem to protect

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1595958761025597440

Chilkur Balaji Temple has been ground zero for both resistance against draconian 30/87 Endowments Act and also Sabarimala judgement conclusion that Deities have ZERO rights resulting in Art 363 #Kantara dispute.
Hon'ble late Justice Rama Jois' foreword and above resoln of dispute

How यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in SC emblem is part of Deity Rights and Constitutional Rama Rajya is now explained through Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution hope SC will do its constitutional duty and ensure principles of Dharma are followed in pending cases

thehindu.com/opinion/lead/f…

Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution has explained the constitutional duty of SC in its emblem and above data shows where it has failed in its duty so far except in few cases. Hope this will awaken Parens Patriae obligation of the Court to do its duty.

After explaining the meaning of यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in the emblem & parens patriae obligation thru resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute Deities'👆look to SC constitutional duty to ensure Deity mandate is followed by freeing Hindu Temples from Govt control

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1599444089656967168

What is clear from this debate participated by people whom Swami Dayananda Saraswati trusted to free Hindu temples on Sept 6th 2014 and their views freely expressed is that both executive and legislature have no intention to do this so it is for SC to act

https://twitter.com/Swamy39/status/1599410692754665472

"Dharma (Righteousness; sense of public duty or virtue) lives in the hearts of public men; when it dies there, no Constitution, no law, no amendment, can save it "Late Nani Palkhivala

Independence of Judiciary is because Judiciary has to uphold Dharma and based on Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem is part of Civilizational basic structure hope SC in pending cases will raise to the occasion and do justice as per Dharma in emblem.

The obligation of Thrippadidanam which continues to be in force in the above manner explained in the thread is the constitutional responsibility of SC is how we now understand Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution that arose from wrong Sabarimala conclusions.

Let us chant
OM VASHAT KARAYA NAMAHA 🙏
SC understands the responsibility arising from the Thrippadidanam obligation the promise made to Deity that Dharma will prevail that this single frame from #Kantara movie explains and how Art 363 #Kantara dispute has resolved itself.

Hope the SC will reach out to Hon'ble former Chief Justice Venkatachaliah ji whose guidance was crucial for resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute on how best to fulfill the above constitutional obligation and make full use of his wisdom.