Here's a fun one. I came across a declassified report referencing North Korea's first known facility to produce liquid propellants, near Manpo-up. Analysts judged the plant produced hydrogen peroxide.
I downloaded a declassified KH-9 satellite image of the place toward the end of construction in 1974 -- although there is a cloud over part of the facility. Still, what a lovely image.
Hydrogen peroxide has its uses in rocketry, but it's not part of common propellant combinations today. North Korea eventually imported Scuds that use RP-1/RFNA, then moved on to using UDMH/NTO. So I wondered whether this site is, or ever was, relevant.
hydrogen-peroxide.us/history-US-Gen…
So, I just started perusing satellite imagery of the site, initially using @googleearth as one does. Wow, that's quite a picture! That certainly looks like a #BFRC to me.🤢
If you don't know what a BFRC is, here is a link to @madwonk's entry in the Wonkpedia. But, long story short: Yes, it looks like it still makes propellants. Just not all that safely. (Not that we were much better, back in the day.)
wonkpedia.org/mediawiki/inde…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Jeffrey Lewis

Dr. Jeffrey Lewis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ArmsControlWonk

Dec 4
This article by @DaslYoon is bad. We've seen lots of testing of this system and its components over the past two years. While I am sure the HS-17 has shortcomings as any new missile would, you do not want a bunch of them fired at your house.
wsj.com/articles/north…
There are several factual statements in the article that are either confused or false. @aaronstein1 and I walked through the modeling that @DuitsmanMS and I have been doing on the Hwasong-17 in the more recent @ACWPodcast so I won't repeat all that here.
patreon.com/posts/how-stin…
As I have pointed out previously, some of the shorter-range tests out of Sunan identified by the USG as being related to ICBM development were probably tests of attitude control systems for a post-boost vehicle that carries multiple warheads.
Read 12 tweets
Nov 18
This chart shows the trajectories, as announced by the Government of Japan, of North Korea's Hwasong-15 ICBM launch in March 2022 and the launch conducted yesterday. The similarity is why I suspect North Korea tested a Hwasong-15 variant yesterday.
To be clear, the Hwasong-15 is an ICBM capable of delivering a nuclear weapon anywhere in the continental United States. This was first tested in 2017. It's got a monument and a postage stamp.
A couple of clarifications. North Korea claimed the March 24 launch was of an even *larger* missile, the Hwasong-17, which could deliver *multiple* warheads anywhere in the continental US. They released an awesomely bad video showing the launch.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 10
Biden is really mangling the details here, but the meaning is clear enough. There is a reason I don't ever talk ranges without notes. A quick explainer.
To start. HIMARS is the launcher or vehicle (left). The two primary munitions are GMLRS and ATACMs (right). ImageImage
GMLRS and ATACMs have very different ranges, as Biden said. Just, uh, not the ranges he mentioned. GMLRS is 70+ km (45 miles). ATACMs is 300 km (180 miles). Image
Read 11 tweets
Nov 2
A few thoughts on this NYT story by @helenecooper, @julianbarnes and @EricSchmittNYT. I don't think Putin will use the bomb, but that restraint isn't based on Putin being nice; it's because he's deterred by escalation.
nytimes.com/2022/11/02/us/…
This is really important reporting. It is important, though, because it explains why the Biden Administration reacted the way it did in mid-October. It tells us rather less about exactly what is happening in Russia.
One criticism I have of most modern reporting is how the few hard facts are scattered through a story filled with vibes. As best I can tell, this is the reporting on the intelligence itself. The rest is context and analysis. Senior Russian military leaders recently had conversations tThe intelligence about the conversations was circulated insi
Read 13 tweets
Oct 4
I am not convinced it was a nuclear weapons convoy, FWIW.
In May, Russia started serial production of a new "uninhabited combat module" (really just a turret) called BM-30-D Spitsa (32V01) for its armored vehicles.
Some Russian armored vehicles with the Spitsa turret were spotted on a train. This is the "convoy" in question.
Read 11 tweets
Oct 3
If the flight was 22 minutes, that would be consistent with our model of the Hwasong-12.
Also, if the RV fell 3,000 km east of Japan, that makes the range from Mupyong-ni ~4,200 km -- which is pretty much what our estimate for the Hwasong-12 IRBM.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(