Argentina vs England (War)
Having some fun playing the new Falklands War DLC of Command Modern Operations #CMO, one of the best air & naval combat simulators out there.
Time is May 4, 1982, can I repeat Argentine Air Force's famous (or infamous) feat that day?
We know the history: Argentine AF, with just a few Super Etendards jets and Exocet anti-ship missiles (ordered 15 from France but only 5 delivered)
launched a daring attack on @RoyalNavy main fleet and sank HMS Sheffield, a Type 42 destroyer, to the horror of British public.
In CMO Falklands War DLC we are given the same limited assets as the Argentine commander had: 2x Super Etendards each with just 1x Exocet, facing Royal Navy armada TF 317.8 of 2 aircraft carriers escorted by a dozen destroyers and frigates, not to mention the Sea Harriers on CAP!
Recon first. At dawn I dispatch a P-2 Neptune maritime patrol aircraft to search for the RN fleet. Neptune's radar is the then already ancient AN/APS-20, but still gets the job done and located British TF 317.8 about 400nm off Argentine coast..
..which brings us another problem. To have any chance of penetrating British defenses our Super Etendards need to attack flying sea-skimming altitude but that would put us out of fuel range. I therefore dispatch a KC-130 tanker to refuel mid-way, as Argentines did historically.
The Super Etendards, piloted by Capt. Augusto Bedacarratz and Lt. Armando Mayora took off from Río Grande and soon reach 100nm within British TF 317.8. Fortunately British Sea Harriers on patrol seem to be far north and didn't see us coming otherwise this would have gone badly...
From here I set Super Etendards to fly at the lowest, sea-skimming altitude of 300ft. This is to take advantage of earth's curvature to avoid British ship radars and sneak up on them. Again, an important modern naval warfare concept one can learn from playing enough CMO!
At 30nm out, Argentine pilots quickly climb to higher altitude, open their Agave radars and.. Ooh la la! The whole British TF 317.8 is on their radar and they had only seconds to pick targets. Staying here any longer and they could be killed by British ships' SAM at anytime.
So they quickly fired off the precious 2 Exocets and turned back. Historically they targeted the ship on the outskirt - the HMS Sheffield. However here I selected the two contacts in the center, guessing those could be my top prizes - Brits' two carriers HMS Hermes & Invincible.
CMO, unlike real-world, assumes all ships and combat systems function 100% at any time. In this case it means my meager 2x Exocets have little chance of making through Brits defense as SAMs and CIWS easily chew them down almost every time until I reloaded/replayed the 8th time..
HIT! One Exocet made it through and struck a ship in the center! Which one could it be?
Historically Argentine pilots only learned the result of their attack later from newspaper. Since they had no safe way to conduct close battle damage assessment (BDA). With CMO however..
..I could simply switch to UK side with editor to see what happened. The lone Exocet struck the smaller RN carrier HMS Invincible! While the damage seems moderate, the hit evidentially took out many Sea Harriers and Sea King helos parked on the deck!
Obviously a hit on HMS Invincible would be even more rewarding vs sinking Sheffield for the Argentines as it could cripple UK fleet's air power and jeopardize the whole war, not to mention morale damage on the British public. Imagine the headlines on these British tabloids..
In fact Argentines later tried repeatedly to attack the British main fleet and two carriers but all failed as they ran out of the most potent Exocet missiles and had to resort to close up attacks with A-4s using unguided bomb! (came with heavy losses)
Nevertheless CMO gives us an interesting way to experiment with alternate history.
Finally here's an interesting article about the several Argentine A-4 attack runs on British fleet, telling from Argentine pilots perspective. It's worth a read! theaviationgeekclub.com/former-argenti…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lai @ChingteLai sworn in as ROC (Taiwan) President on 5/20. What can we learn from his inauguration speech?
For one, Lai explicitly paraded with "Indo-Pac. Security Act" by US Congress, seems he truly believes it means actual US mil. aids to Taiwan, which is an utter fantasy.
Let's make it clear: There will be *zero* "US military aids" (as in "free" freebie) to Taiwan.
Whatever will be delivered would only be those already purchased and paid in full by Taiwan but [promised] deliveries delayed for yrs. This "$1.9b "efense articles" are merely those.
In reality Taiwan purchased and paid for a long list of US weapons (their usefulness being another debate) but the faltering US defense industry (among other reasons) failed to deliver after yrs. For more on this check out @EricGomezAsia's excellent data: cato.org/blog/breaking-…
As a matter of fact, "legislative brawl" is nothing new in Taiwan. Has been going on since day 1 of Taiwan's democracy. All* partisan sides initiated/abused it, usually when in LY minority (this year's case DPP)
I will explain why this came to be a Taiwanese tradition👇
In early years (late 1980s/early 90s) oppositions (e.g. DPP) were minority in the LY. To "counter" KMT majority, some DPP MPs resorted to "physical" oppositions. One of worst early offenders was Ju Gau-jeng, a DPP MP infamous for numerous fighting in the LY.
Why fight club tradition spread? As it turned out, Ju's fighting made him very* popular among wingnut supporters and he got rich from all the attention and donations. This became the default playbook for many TW pols after Ju to gain quick attention and press coverage.
ROC (#Taiwan) President Tsai @iingwen will finish her two-terms on May 20, when @ChingteLai will take over. How do Taiwanese public see Tsai's legacy last 8 years?
This NEW poll by TPOF did a wide ranging survey, check out the report here:
(Thread) tpof.org/wp-content/upl…
Most importantly, at the end of Tsai presidency Taiwan public have divided views on her govt's handling of cross-strait relations, which has seen China's ever escalating military incursions & posture against Taiwan.
A slight majority Taiwanese are also not happy with Tsai's handling of Taiwan's economy, although on this Tsai's 2nd term has improved considerably compared to her 1st term when sentiments were extremely negative.
Is Taiwan ruling govt. showing off to the world (or China) how piss-poor its military is?
Last week @MoNDefense organized a so-called "first female reserve training" inviting 60(!) journalists to see 14 female reservists.
For starter: Clear violation of BASIC gun safety rules.
You see this army sergeant (supposedly an active service soldier) not even correcting such horrendous safety violation, something even American boy scouts are trained not to do.
Why? Because Taiwan military rarely taught its troops even basic firearm safety rules. That's why.
Of course you cannot expect the clueless foreign press or those who subscribed to the cult of Taiwan ruling govt to be serious about anything. But what is the policy goal/purpose of this "reserve training" PR clown show if they can't even get the "show" part look half legit?
What do Taiwanese public think about "One China" and so-called "1992 Consensus"?
Latest poll by TPOF finds a strong majority of 67% disagree with the *BASIC* version of OC/92C i.e.
“Taiwan and the mainland belong to one China”.
However there's more to it..
What about Taiwan's opposition party @kuomintang's official position on OC/92C? Namely:
“..One China is the Republic of China (ROC)”
In which case, substantially more Taiwanese agree to it though still opposed by just half of the people.
Finally, there's PRC/CCP's version:
"..One China is the People’s Republic of China (PRC)"
This is overwhelmingly rejected by Taiwanese public and only has single-digit support.
For the full April poll see: tpof.org/wp-content/upl…
It is unfortunate Japan's Nikkei @4946nikkei published some awful *anonymous* "reports" on Taiwan's military & politics making wild but unsubstantiated, illogical allegations.
It claims (anon. source) 90% (!) TW military's retired officers went to China to be recruited as spies.
Even as a noted critic of Taiwan's military, I do not make accusations of Chinese spies within or Q of allegiance lightly as I have not seen evidence they are as widespread as some repeatedly claimed.
TW military is incompetent, but not *infiltrated*. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27….
There have been a number of spies caught over the years for sure. Taiwan and China IC both made some* efforts to recruit from other side no doubt. But considering all things, data point do not support the idea there are PRC spires everywhere in TW military.