this is wonderful going into #303CreativeVElenis oral arguments this morning where SCOTUS is going to listen to some whiner complain that her evangelical Christianity means she doesn’t have to make a wedding website for a same sex couple. 😒
https://twitter.com/gregggonsalves/status/1599466560519016448
~plot twist~ nobody, gay or straight, ever even asked this broad to make them a custom wedding website because her company doesn’t even make wedding websites.
She just wants to maybe get into the wedding website business in the future and when she does she wants to discriminate.
She just wants to maybe get into the wedding website business in the future and when she does she wants to discriminate.
Standing. Ripeness. Justiciable controversy.
Used to be a requirement.
#303Creative is a preenforcement action which is sometimes allowed but not when there’s no credible threat of enforcement which here there absolutely is not.
The SCOTUS is illegitimate.
Used to be a requirement.
#303Creative is a preenforcement action which is sometimes allowed but not when there’s no credible threat of enforcement which here there absolutely is not.
The SCOTUS is illegitimate.
This is Masterpiece Cakeshop 2. Remember the baker who refused to make a gay couple a wedding cake?
Except here, there’s no evidence anyone asked for a specific wedding website. She just wants to announce that she’s not making wedding websites for gay couples. Lol
It’s stupid
Except here, there’s no evidence anyone asked for a specific wedding website. She just wants to announce that she’s not making wedding websites for gay couples. Lol
It’s stupid
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
