"राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
We The People & Bharat(inclusive of all living beings) belong to Shri Rama & His property law in Art 26 (d) when property defined 👆takes color of Dharma & duty of SC with यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem to protect
Bharatha's definition of property in Ramayana with slight modification became legally valid through deed of dedication of Marthandavarma and applying SC Ayodhya judgement along with Ruler Deity status u Art 363 securing Part III rights and definition of law as Dharma by Rajaji👆
Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution has established
Travancore Constitutional Rama Rajya as defined above thus continues to be in force
Thus spirit which is present in pictures of original constitution & emblems has been made part of Civilizational basic structure and protected in Art 26 read with Art 363 & Art 372 Shri Rama Raja Rights successfully through Art 363 #Kantara dispute resoln swarajyamag.com/blogs/why-rama…
After achieving divine objective of establishing Bharat:India 2.0 Constitutional Rama Rajya through minor reinterpretation of words Shri Rama Raja of Constitution completed His Digvijay Yatra
What people thought needed major constitutional amendment etc. has been achieved by Shri Rama Raja of Constitution in the above simple manner.
The larger divine goal of Shri Rama Raja in achieving above divine objective secuting and building on top of SC Ayodhya judgement can now be best understood by reading historic letter of HH Saantananda Maharshi Swamiji in support of Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution
The people who have been in awe of the creation of a new Constitutional Morality doctrine interpretation which weakened Art 26 can appreciate the elegant response of Deities
and appreciate the smile of Shri Rama Raja of Constitution
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
We The People & Bharat(inclusive of all living beings) belong to Shri Rama & His property law in Art 26 (d) when property defined 👆takes color of Dharma & duty of SC with यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem to protect
A Picture is worth a thousands words true 👆
But it does not govern the interpretation of our constitution by SC
So there is a need to translate it into words
Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community has done this great devotional service to our Nation Bharat
What the Rama Rajya picture conveys is present in Ramayana in the words of Bharata
Shri Marthandavarma made this definition of spiritual property of Shri Rama with minor change into a legal definition that can be asserted in Court through deed of dedication of Travancore Kingdom
"..right of the deity to follow His Dharma flows from Article 25(1) and Article 26 of the Constitution." When argument rejected by SC
Shri Rama Raja have linked यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in SC emblem with right u Art 26 read w Art 363 & Art 372 through Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution
Thread describes how victory of dharma achieved in Art 363 #Kantara dispute through devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community
Shri Rama Raja of Constitution has used the argument of the State agreed to by Judiciary that agreement between British Queen and Prince of Arcot continues to be in force u Art 372 to good effect to enforce Thrippadidanam obligation inherited by SC which is also in its emblem 👆
In this thread on Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community contributions covered the role of Dr Ambedkar who belonged to the community in inserting Art 26 and explaining meaning of God in Constitutional Oath basis for Bharat:India2.0 Constitutional Rama Rajya
While Dr Ambedkar felt Art 32 was Atma of our Constitution resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute has shown that Art 26 is the Antaratma of our Constitution which was inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya with a key role played by Dr Ambedkar which is recorded
While Travancore Maharajas went to Shri Padmanabha Swamy temple daily to secure guidance of Ruler Deity to fulfill Thripadidanam obligation the same is achieved through Constitutional Oath which has been explained by Dr Ambedkar in the Constituent Assembly
The correct interpretation of our Constitution👇thru resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute secured by devotional efforts of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community highlighting constitutional dharmik duty of SC in our Bharat : India 2.0 Constitutional Rama Rajya
SC has inherited Constitutional Thrippadidanam obligation is how we understand Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution and explained in 👇 thread and how the Oath binds Hon'ble SC Judges as explained by Dr Ambedkar in Constituent assembly in context of Art 60
Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution converts the moral obligation of Oath of Hon'ble SC Judges as explained by Dr Ambedkar when violated then Shri Rama Raja God of our Constitution can raise Art 363 dispute to ensure dharmik guidance which Hon'ble SC Judges Oath binds is followed
"राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
We The People & Bharat(inclusive of all living beings) belong to Shri Rama & His property law in Art 26 (d) when property defined 👆takes color of Dharma & duty of SC with यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem to protect
Chilkur Balaji Temple has been ground zero for both resistance against draconian 30/87 Endowments Act and also Sabarimala judgement conclusion that Deities have ZERO rights resulting in Art 363 #Kantara dispute.
Hon'ble late Justice Rama Jois' foreword and above resoln of dispute
How यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in SC emblem is part of Deity Rights and Constitutional Rama Rajya is now explained through Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution hope SC will do its constitutional duty and ensure principles of Dharma are followed in pending cases
The resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute which established that principles of Travancore Constitutional Rama Rajya continues to be in force in view of merger promise also establishes above constitutional mandate of the Deity also in force in Art 26
In addition to the points made in the important programe it is now time to implement the constitutional mandate of Deity esp after resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute which continues to be in force and is not in favor of Govt control of Hindu Temples